Dublinbet Experience......

[Skakus]

The new 1 to 10 spread is not a big change. All they did was eliminate the first .50 bet.

You can still bet 1.5, 2, 2.5, etc all the way to 10.

You know it only takes a few moments to close the current wheel browser and log back on to the same wheel at the next level of progression? You can do this across the three different table spreads for the same wheel. So the overall spread for DB is now .10 to 25, and you can play half units from 1 to 25.

That's a good spread if you need it. Not good for bots though.

[Azim]

How come I can't find a .10c table on Dublinbet?

[Blood Angel]

Hi Azim,
No idea why you can't. Its in the usual place for picking a table. See attachment.

EDIT* Dunno how I managed to do it twice 

[Azim]

Thanks.. I will try again.

[TwoCatSam]

I had no trouble finding it.

[DuffMiver]

That's great. But hey, try my new tracker/strategy. (only for testing) Losing streaks are far less. I'm doing spins now to see if a long losing streak will happen (That haven't happened YET)  Come with results soon.

IF this is true, (no long losing streaks) this is a much better wheel strategy.


I cannot recommend playing that 123 move-strategy, I lost a lot (real money). Long losing streaks happen. Better quit while you're ahead.

Cheers

hahahaha!

A bit of advice...
Just because you have no control doesn't make this a bad strategy. The wheel movement for YOU will do the same. Learn to play with control and you can make pretty much ANY strategy work.
At least one good thing is that you are looking to beat the wheel using short term logic. We all know that long term nothing can beat the wheel so you have to play short term with a strategy that suits that current situation.

Just for the record your 123 move results for me...
5685 Spins (96hrs)
$362 Profit ($3.77ph)

Biggest losing streak was 18 in a row and had many other big number losses in a row but still come out ahead using only flat betting.

I'll come join the band wagon on the movement strategy and see if there is a way to make a profit from that too.

TwoCatSam seems to be the closest to this with his super duper tracker.

[Skakus]

Just for the record your 123 move results for me...
5685 Spins (96hrs)
$362 Profit ($3.77ph)

What's the base unit?

[ignatus]

hahahaha!

A bit of advice...
Just because you have no control doesn't make this a bad strategy. The wheel movement for YOU will do the same. Learn to play with control and you can make pretty much ANY strategy work.
At least one good thing is that you are looking to beat the wheel using short term logic. We all know that long term nothing can beat the wheel so you have to play short term with a strategy that suits that current situation.

Just for the record your 123 move results for me...
5685 Spins (96hrs)
$362 Profit ($3.77ph)

Biggest losing streak was 18 in a row and had many other big number losses in a row but still come out ahead using only flat betting.,

I'll come join the band wagon on the movement strategy and see if there is a way to make a profit from that too.

TwoCatSam seems to be the closest to this with his super duper tracker.

That's great. 

Well, I study the wheel movements, But i think that tracker is not complete why? First clockwise and anticlockwise doesn't matter. Second, The distance is calculated wrong,(0-36) and it runs each spin clockwise then anticlockwise then back to clockwise it makes no sense.

Distance should be calculated from 0-18. That is always the shortest distance between two spins.

[ddarko]

First clockwise and anticlockwise doesn't matter.

Not sure that people in the know will agree with you on the above statement. 

[ginger]

It is wrong to observe and make system by spins from some specific wheel becasue they all produce RANDOM. Roulette wheel is just tool for making RANDOM. That was its real purpose, studying random, before the game.

It is also unnecessary to test anything that way you do and also painfully slow. You have a lot of past spins from many casinos to check on your system. You have also random.org where you have TRNG (true RNG-independant, physical randomness from athmosphere noise) so you can get true random numbers from there too (as much as you want basicaly)

All systems must pass enough number of placed bets to confirm in the longterm your strategy works. We are talking here over hundreds of thousands and even more.

That fail of all your systems since they changed the wheels is pure "coincidence" (to you). They would fail anyhow.

There is no "system" that wins this game with the way it is setted in the casinos. That is mathematical fact. All systems would won actualy with enough resources, but all of players are stopped to use them at some point (even if they could have them) with table limits.

Everything in roulette equals in the longterm, but it doesn't have to in the short term.

The reason why you lose is that at some point you can't progressivly follow anymore losses by betting against them. You are stopped by table limits.

All those darn losses are coming from one characteristic of randomness (no matter what you play you will encounter them more then table limits will allow you to overcome it with progression [if playing continuosly and without entering only at statisticaly slight better points] ) called VARIANCE. Maximum you will encounter in roulette is slight over 5 STD-s for outside chances and 3.0 std  covers 99.7% of sessions. For dozens is lower around 4.5 STD and so on.. Outside bets have biggest variance of all bets in roulette.

But thing is that varinace has its limits so we can say randomness in roulette has its limits. True.

Roulette spins are independant if observed one by one, but in larger sequences not at all. They must obey to laws of nature, laws of randomness and probability...

Cheers

Drazen

Hello Drazen,

No problems at this end what concerning the Dealers Sgn.

Cheers mate

John                Rotterdam

[ginger]

It is wrong to observe and make system by spins from some specific wheel becasue they all produce RANDOM. Roulette wheel is just tool for making RANDOM. That was its real purpose, studying random, before the game.

It is also unnecessary to test anything that way you do and also painfully slow. You have a lot of past spins from many casinos to check on your system. You have also random.org where you have TRNG (true RNG-independant, physical randomness from athmosphere noise) so you can get true random numbers from there too (as much as you want basicaly)

All systems must pass enough number of placed bets to confirm in the longterm your strategy works. We are talking here over hundreds of thousands and even more.

That fail of all your systems since they changed the wheels is pure "coincidence" (to you). They would fail anyhow.

There is no "system" that wins this game with the way it is setted in the casinos. That is mathematical fact. All systems would won actualy with enough resources, but all of players are stopped to use them at some point (even if they could have them) with table limits.

Everything in roulette equals in the longterm, but it doesn't have to in the short term.

The reason why you lose is that at some point you can't progressivly follow anymore losses by betting against them. You are stopped by table limits.

All those darn losses are coming from one characteristic of randomness (no matter what you play you will encounter them more then table limits will allow you to overcome it with progression [if playing continuosly and without entering only at statisticaly slight better points] ) called VARIANCE. Maximum you will encounter in roulette is slight over 5 STD-s for outside chances and 3.0 std  covers 99.7% of sessions. For dozens is lower around 4.5 STD and so on.. Outside bets have biggest variance of all bets in roulette.

But thing is that varinace has its limits so we can say randomness in roulette has its limits. True.

Roulette spins are independant if observed one by one, but in larger sequences not at all. They must obey to laws of nature, laws of randomness and probability...

Cheers

Drazen

   Dear Drazen some more to proof that DS is no luck just technique

   Previous pic. was J3 , I show you J1 & J2 as well , it shows hit after hit ....follow the Marque.

   Bye for now.

  John         Rotterdam

[ginger]

It is wrong to observe and make system by spins from some specific wheel becasue they all produce RANDOM. Roulette wheel is just tool for making RANDOM. That was its real purpose, studying random, before the game.

It is also unnecessary to test anything that way you do and also painfully slow. You have a lot of past spins from many casinos to check on your system. You have also random.org where you have TRNG (true RNG-independant, physical randomness from athmosphere noise) so you can get true random numbers from there too (as much as you want basicaly)

All systems must pass enough number of placed bets to confirm in the longterm your strategy works. We are talking here over hundreds of thousands and even more.

That fail of all your systems since they changed the wheels is pure "coincidence" (to you). They would fail anyhow.

There is no "system" that wins this game with the way it is setted in the casinos. That is mathematical fact. All systems would won actualy with enough resources, but all of players are stopped to use them at some point (even if they could have them) with table limits.

Everything in roulette equals in the longterm, but it doesn't have to in the short term.

The reason why you lose is that at some point you can't progressivly follow anymore losses by betting against them. You are stopped by table limits.

All those darn losses are coming from one characteristic of randomness (no matter what you play you will encounter them more then table limits will allow you to overcome it with progression [if playing continuosly and without entering only at statisticaly slight better points] ) called VARIANCE. Maximum you will encounter in roulette is slight over 5 STD-s for outside chances and 3.0 std  covers 99.7% of sessions. For dozens is lower around 4.5 STD and so on.. Outside bets have biggest variance of all bets in roulette.

But thing is that varinace has its limits so we can say randomness in roulette has its limits. True.

Roulette spins are independant if observed one by one, but in larger sequences not at all. They must obey to laws of nature, laws of randomness and probability...

Cheers

Drazen

  And the last one Drazen.

  Read them as J1,J2,J3

  Have a nice weekend


  John         Rotterdam

[Drazen]

Thanks John. I dont doubt at all this still works for you  . But I meant on true DS, this is a bit different then what you do.

Anyway thanks for the advices. I ll try it.

Cheers

Drazen

[starkygold]

I need help 

Do you know after how many minutes dealers change at dublinbet?

Thanks

[DuffMiver]

What's the base unit?

10 cents Mate.
Small update I sometimes split the wheel into 6 or more sectors depending on the dealer. Also I have been testing dynamic sectors. Both off which I'm still testing. Not enough spins to post anything concret as yet.