Mary Jane

[ignatus]

Terrible loss at Dublin.

Well? You got the results; It has good hitrate, but loss can happen. You've got the advice to use stoploss. That's the best I can do for now.

Since this strategy is betting for cw & cww patterns (repeats) it will not always happen. Compare this to RBRBRB RRRRR BBBBB cw & cww patterns (repeats) will form like RRRRR or BBBBB, but not always. Sometime a RBRBRB pattern comes. Same thing. But then cw & cww repeats are more common than R/B-repeats

In the long run it will last hopefully (longer sessions)

[Skakus]

This is a big bag of kief, mostly leaf, stalks, and seeds.

I'll wait for the buds, thanks.

[ignatus]

This is a big bag of kief, mostly leaf, stalks, and seeds.

I'll wait for the buds, thanks.

This is good shit! Best quality stuff! 

[ignatus]

Second session (Live at DB)

WLWWLLLWLLLLLLLLWLWLLWLWLWWLLWLWWLLWLLLLLLLWLLLLLWWWLLWWWLLLW

61 games played 61*14= 854
22 games won 22*36= 792

Total= -62 (no stoploss)

42 games played= 588
18 games won= 648

Total= +60 (with stoploss at 3 losses in a row & wait for virtual win)

[ignatus]

*correction*

41 games played=41*14= 574
17 games won=17*36= 612

Total= +38 (with stoploss)

[DuffMiver]

Mary Jane needs a sister or a man who can talk some sense into her!

She should look for the first 2 to 4 spins from the dealer CCW & CW and then work out her average spin distance before going into action. make this Dynamic so that every spin is calculated and spin distance averages are constantly updated.

Right now Playing Mary Jane is like a hoar puling her knickers up and down!

I have better results using any 14 number sector bet generated from an RNG. Maybe Mary might do better on Airball where the spin distances seem to be more stable. I'll give it a go today and let you know.

[ignatus]

Mary Jane needs a sister or a man who can talk some sense into her!

She should look for the first 2 to 4 spins from the dealer CCW & CW and then work out her average spin distance before going into action. make this Dynamic so that every spin is calculated and spin distance averages are constantly updated.

Right now Playing Mary Jane is like a hoar puling her knickers up and down!

I have better results using any 14 number sector bet generated from an RNG. Maybe Mary might do better on Airball where the spin distances seem to be more stable. I'll give it a go today and let you know.

Alright 

[Turner]

You are welcome to the zoo, but please don’t feed the animals.

Can i poke them with a stick?

[DuffMiver]

Alright 

New challenge for you Ignatus. If you can programme the tracker then Mary Jane will ROCK HER TITS OFF! 

[ignatus]

New challenge for you Ignatus. If you can programme the tracker then Mary Jane will ROCK HER TITS OFF! 

Well, yes? A dynamic tracker is too complicated for me. I'll leave that to better coders. I'm not sure that would increase hitrate? Perhaps,... but I don't think the difference will be great? Focus on a certan range lesser numbers, lesser hitrate.

How was your result

[Drazen]

You are welcome to the zoo, but please don’t feed the animals.

Drazen: Did I ever tell you about the time I came face to face with a very fierce gorilla?
Skakus: No, what happened?
Drazen: Well, I stood there, without a gun . . . The gorilla looked at me and snarled and roared and beat his chest. Then it came closer and closer . . .
Skakus: What did you do?
Drazen: Oh, Id had enough, so I moved on to the next cage.
     

[ignatus]

<3

[Skakus]

Can i poke them with a stick?

You do have a mean streak, don't you Turner! 

Drazen: Did I ever tell you about the time I came face to face with a very fierce gorilla?
Skakus: No, what happened?
Drazen: Well, I stood there, without a gun . . . The gorilla looked at me and snarled and roared and beat his chest. Then it came closer and closer . . .
Skakus: What did you do?
Drazen: Oh, Id had enough, so I moved on to the next cage.

  classic! 

[DuffMiver]

Well, yes? A dynamic tracker is too complicated for me. I'll leave that to better coders. I'm not sure that would increase hitrate? Perhaps,... but I don't think the difference will be great? Focus on a certain range lesser numbers, lesser hitrate.

How was your result

LIVE DEALER
1. WLWLLLWWLLLLLLWLLWLWLLLWWWWWWW = +8.4u
2. LLWLWLWWWLWWWWWLLLLLW = +10.2u

AIR BALL
1. WLWWWLLLWLWWLLWLWLLLWLWWWLLLWLLLLW = +6.4u
2. WWWLWLWLLWWLLLLWLLLWLLWWLWW = +9u

2hrs = +34u

So far so good. Seems to be a nice follow on from the 123 move which I had good success with mainly due to managing my BR. 

I hate progression so as a nice change I use the following....

Based on the 14 number bet and my BR I can afford 50c flat bet per number. Instead of sticking all the 50c on, I put 10c on each. After a loss I can go to 20c then 30c etc up to my flat bet of 50c. As you can see this is not a normal progression but one that starts off in a negative way based on what your 'normal' minimum flat bet unit is for each number.

Maybe you are right and a more dynamic selection might not make much difference but it would be nice to try. So let's throw out the challenge to anyone and see if a tracker could be made to do this. Unfortunately my experience in programing or excel are limited otherwise I would of given it a go.

Good job on the tracker 

Hope that this time you don't spunk away your bankroll 

[ignatus]

LIVE DEALER
1. WLWLLLWWLLLLLLWLLWLWLLLWWWWWWW = +8.4u
2. LLWLWLWWWLWWWWWLLLLLW = +10.2u

AIR BALL
1. WLWWWLLLWLWWLLWLWLLLWLWWWLLLWLLLLW = +6.4u
2. WWWLWLWLLWWLLLLWLLLWLLWWLWW = +9u

2hrs = +34u

So far so good. Seems to be a nice follow on from the 123 move which I had good success with mainly due to managing my BR. 

I hate progression so as a nice change I use the following....

Based on the 14 number bet and my BR I can afford 50c flat bet per number. Instead of sticking all the 50c on, I put 10c on each. After a loss I can go to 20c then 30c etc up to my flat bet of 50c. As you can see this is not a normal progression but one that starts off in a negative way based on what your 'normal' minimum flat bet unit is for each number.

Maybe you are right and a more dynamic selection might not make much difference but it would be nice to try. So let's throw out the challenge to anyone and see if a tracker could be made to do this. Unfortunately my experience in programing or excel are limited otherwise I would of given it a go.

Good job on the tracker 

Hope that this time you don't spunk away your bankroll 

Thanks, it was this kind of result I was waiting for. I *knew* it would work before I made it. What's great about it, it's only focused on the WHEEL movements. That means: if it works, only a change in law of physics can change the results. (And that won't happen anytime soon!) 

Cheers