The Craziest Parlay Ever!

[GLC]

Pick a number between 1 and 12.


Go to the casino.

Buy-in for 143 units.


Bet 1 unit on the street represented by your number.


When you win, bet the 12 units the dealer just handed you on that same street going for 2-in-a-row.  This is a single parlay. 


A double win will net you 143 units.


If you don't hit within 143 spins, you will have lost your 143 unit buy-in.


Save up another 143 units and try again in the future.


Any time you win, take the units above your 143 unit buy-in and put them in profits.


With a little luck, you can win some chips.


Another option for bet selection is to bet for a repeat of the last spin.  Any time you win, let-it-ride.  A triple hit on the same street will net you 143 units minus any lost attempts prior to the win.


Pros:  A win early will net you a good win.


Cons:  A triple hit on a street doesn't always happen so quickly.


How lucky do you feel?


George

[Turner]

George....
Correct...if I may say so.

Luck luck luck. But not just random betting. betting with a hint of thought about it. Bet selection and MM.

Its funny is this. Some of the newer members will think you have lost the plot.

its just a naive betting idea. Wheres the varience...wheres the law of the third...wheres the 32 step progression?

But some of the more experienced members will recognise that at the end of the learning process it boils down to careful and managed luck ideas. I have tried every (and I mean every) coded system for rx from Victor's site and from members here.
I have tried over 200 ideas. They all do exactly the same. very good...then very bad.

its time to relax now and realise that great ideas like this are the true esscence of roulette. No need to thrash around for hours on end with complecated ideas that all end up in the bin.

Turner

[GLC]

George....
Correct...if I may say so.

Luck luck luck. But not just random betting. betting with a hint of thought about it. Bet selection and MM.

Its funny is this. Some of the newer members will think you have lost the plot.

its just a naive betting idea. Wheres the varience...wheres the law of the third...wheres the 32 step progression?

But some of the more experienced members will recognise that at the end of the learning process it boils down to careful and managed luck ideas. I have tried every (and I mean every) coded system for rx from Victor's site and from members here.
I have tried over 200 ideas. They all do exactly the same. very good...then very bad.

its time to relax now and realise that great ideas like this are the true esscence of roulette. No need to thrash around for hours on end with complecated ideas that all end up in the bin.

Turner

Well said my friend, well said.


We all get to the same place after going through the highs and lows  a gillion times.


It still beats the slots!

[probasah]

Dear GLC,

Thanks for the idea. Tested your bet. It doesn`t seem to pass 40k live spins.

See attached tracker (insert numbers on green column and the number 1-12 on the 1st spot

Regards,
Alex

[probasah]

See attached images with the Ballances. Same numbers/ different street selection

Alex

[GLC]

Alex,  Thanks for the graphs.  A couple are scary as all get out.  A couple are phenomenal.  And most are so-so.  Pretty much what we can expect.


If it wouldn't be too much trouble, can you run the same spins playing for a repeat of the last street instead of picking each street to play exclusively?  Looking for 2 wins in a row.


GLC

[probasah]

Dear GLC,

Here You are, betting on the last street.


Regards,
Alex

[vladir]

maybe wait for X virtual losses before starting to bet? I know people say it makes no diference My experiences haveproven otherwise many times... only problem is finding the perfect X for each system.

[GLC]

Dear GLC,

Here You are, betting on the last street.


Regards,
Alex

Goes to show, ya gotta be one of the lucky ones!

[Ralph]

This is to try 143 times, win or lose.  A streaky table can gain a lot, or we lose 143 units.  A zero wheel eats in time any bankroll, a 00 wheel faster. We can run all we see for a long time using a simulator,  and the answer will almost be it won't work.

We win against the odds, and that is possible sometimes. 

Even if we had NOZ or a method which gave us 2% edge, we can lose heavy, The edge start show after long runs, if it is negative, zero or plus. A short run will win or lose most of the time more than the edge due to the imbalance.

My opinion is zillions test has very low value, the answer we have before the zillion run.

[vladir]

How about a progression? After we have bet 1 unit for 143 spins, start betting 2 units for another 72 spins. If still no luck, 3 units for more 48 spins, and then 36 spins with 4 units. Total bankrool required for this is 532 units and we will be ok if we get 2 consecutive hits in 300 spins.  Sure, eventually we will loose, but how much can we win before that happens?

... we can stretch the progression more... until it's reallyyyyyyyyyyy hard to loose (never imposible of course). What you think?

[GLC]

I guess the problem is that  we're getting pretty darn close to flat betting.  How large does our unit have to be before the time invested is worth the money we win.  That's kind of where I was testing the Project 202.  It seems to always win, but the time investment can be very heavy.  Maybe when you're retired and have plenty of time on your hands.

This is what I've noticed playing my flatbet parlay progression.  I have tested it playing up to 6 parlays.  That wins 128 units if you win 7 times in a row starting with 1 unit.  I've never lost 128 units.  It's always recovered.  But, the time it often takes to win a few units can be hours and hours.  Your unit size has to be pretty large to keep your interest.

GLC