• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Dominant EC bet selection - has this been tested before

Started by ulsteroptom, Mar 22, 01:24 PM 2013

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

ulsteroptom

Track four spins

Like this
RRBR
HLHL
OEOO

trigger is two dominant EC, so in this example we have Red and Odd

My bet will be on numbers Red Odd (Hi and Low) 10 numbers
do this will have min of 8 numbers and max 10 number bets

seems to be a descent bet selection at moment - expecting a 25% hit rate
therefore only betting for 4 spins, hit or miss, re track at this point
using 111222333444555 progression, miss move up one, hit move down two

tweaks needed
re track with dealer change
I have been keeping a running track of the past four spins and adjusting my bet selection accordingly
there are times i find the bet does not change from each set of four spins, and sometimes the hit rate can be really good, and if it misses you are only chasing for four spins and then changing your bet selection to the new hot selection

more testing needed of course
has this been tried before, i would imagine it must have

ulsteroptom

I am only using 4 spins before bet selection , because I have found if I wait for any more spins, say for instance six, allot of times you have ties for more than one EC bet, and also you seem to miss out on more hits, trying to catch the streaks while they are still hot, 4 seems to be good for now

Ralph

Everything like this have been tested many times before!  If it is good or not depends of the particular outcome, which will never be the same each trials.  Most methods are very old since about 1870-1915.

You can use it, it will not harm, and you can win, even a lot, due to you chose the method in the right moment.

Some will win and some will lose, and in some cases terrible!  A game of chance!!
The best way to fail, is not to try!

ulsteroptom

I am new to the game of roulette, and find the study intriguing to say the least, (more a blackjack and poker man myself), but I find methods that try to target whats happening at the moment rather than playing for what is expected to happen seem to work best. This bet selection seem to target the streaks quite well as it seems to catch the repeaters as well. Are there previous forum posts along the same lines that anyone can recommend so that I may further tweak this

As there is no such thing as a known holy grail, what system will not lose, is it not about having an arsenal of good systems that could make a buck or two.   

ulsteroptom

HERE WAS A QUICK REAL MONEY TEST

ulsteroptom

CORRECTION, MADE A MISTAKE COPYING OVER MY RESULTS IN THE LAST RUN OF THE TEST , FORGOT NUMBERS 36 AND 16, APOLOGIES

ulsteroptom

FEW CHANGES ON HOW I AM PLAYING THIS
TRACK 4 NEW DEALER,
LOOK FOR TRIGGER OF TWO DOMINANT EC BETS BEFORE BETTING
IF FOUR LOSSES- THIS IS MY STOP LOSS - WAIT FOR VIRTUAL WIN FOR THAT DEALER, AFTER VW CONTINUE BETTING IF BET TRIGGER

WORKING ON ANOTHER TRIGGER FOR THIS - NOTICED WHILE PLAYING TODAY= WILL SEE HOW THIS WOULD HAVE PLAYED OUT WITH YESTERDAYS AND TODAYS SESSION

PLAYING FOR REAL AT MOMENT WHILE IT WORKS WHY NOT- JUST TRYING DIFFERENT IDEAS TO TRY AND PROTECT MY WINNINGS - TRYING TO AVOID THAT RFH

ulsteroptom

SLOW NIGHT TONIGHT - BUT STILL FINISHED WITH 90 UNITS
NEW TWEAK FOR THIS - WAITING FOR VW BEFORE BEGIN BETTING AT EACH DEALER CHANGE- MAY HELP TO CATCH THE WAVES FOR THIS BET  - IF I HAD NOT DECIDED TO CHANGE TO THIS - WOULD HAVE LOST ALL MY WINNINGS

AS IT STANDS 99 + 130 +90 = UP ABOUT 320 POUNDS IN JUST UNDER 400 SPINS

ANY SUGGESTIONS - LOOKING FOR A STRONGER TRIGGER - THAT MAY HAVE MADE TONIGHT MORE INTERESTING -

ulsteroptom

HAD TO GIVE IT ANOTHER GO TONIGHT
HOPE THIS CONTINUES

-