• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Algorithm win or break even hybrid, even money bets.

Started by ego, Apr 12, 01:13 PM 2013

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1 2 3 ... 5
User actions

ego

Apr 12, 01:13 PM 2013
Algorithm win or break even hybrid, even money bets.

This is one experiment using the lines.
I reckon that we would follow what is current and have a show.

This is how it works.
You follow the first three lines that show.
If you lose you play that line and the three other lines that you follow to break even.

So you play even money position to capitalize and when you lose you play dozen position to break even.
Each time you end a sequence at break even you restart the algorithm.

50% to strike domination/trending and around 80 to 85% to break even if first attempt fail.

Image

TRNG 2013 04 12

1
3
1
6
3 W
5 L
2 L

4
3
4
4
5
3 W
4 W
1 L
4 W
5 W
2 L
2 W
1 L
3 W
4 W
3 W
3 W
5 W
4 W
5 W
1 L
1 W
5 W
5 W
3 W
3 W
4 W
3 W
6 L
6 W
3 W
3 W
3 W
3 W
4 W
1 L
4 W
3 W
2 L
2 W
1 L
5 W
5 W
6 L
5 W
1 L
3 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
5 W
3 W
1 L
1 W
4 W
4 W
3 W
3 W
4 W
2 L
2 W
1 L
1 W
4 W
5 W
3 W
2 L
6 L

2
4
5
5 W
5 W
1 L
5 W
5 W
4 W
3 L
1 L

1
2
2
4
4 W
1 W
4 W
4 W
2 W
1 W
1 W
2 W
5 L
2 W
3 L
3 W
3 L
4 W
4 W
5 L
6 L

1
3
5
4 L
1 W
2 L
1 W
2 L
2 W
5 W
4 L
4 W
3 W
6 L
5 W
4 L
4 W
4 L
2 L

6
4
3
6 W
4 W
5 L
6 W
6 W
5 L
5 W
2 L
4 W
2 L
1 L

4
5
5
4
5
6
3 L
6 W
2 L
3 L

4
3
3
5
4 W
4 W
5 W
5 W
5 W
5 W
3 W
2 L
1 L

2
2
2
3
1
1 W
4 L
6 L

2
5
6
5 W
4 L
6 W
2 W
2 W
2 W
6 W
1 L
6 W
3 L
5 W
1 L
6 W
4 L
3 L

4
1
5
5 W
6 L
5 W
5 W
5 W
6 L
1 W
2 L
4 W
1 W
5 W
5 W
3 L
5 W
6 L
6 W
1 W
4 W
5 W
5 W
3 L
1 W
2 L
6 L

2
1
1
3
3 W
4 L
3 W
1 W
5 L
6 L

4
1
1
4
5
6 L
6 W
2 L
4 W
1 W
4 W
1 W
5 W
3 L
1 W
1 W
2 L
4 W
1 W
1 W
3 L
1 W
6 L
4 W
5 W
4 W
2 L
5 W
2 L
4 W
1 W
4 W
5 W
1 W
4 W
3 L
4 W
1 W
6 L
2 L

3
5
6
1 L
5 W
6 W
1 L
4 L

5
3
6
5 W
4 L
6 W
5 W
3 W
6 W
2 L
1 L

4
6
2
4 W
5 L
4 W
6 W
3 L
2 W
5 L
5 W
6 W
2 W
4 W
3 L
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#1
Apr 12, 01:14 PM 2013
TRNG 2013 04 11

6
5
4
6 W
5 W
3 L
3 W
4 W
1 L
5 W
4 W
1 L
5 W
6 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
3 L
4 W
1 L
6 W
1 L
2 L

4
2
2
4
3
2 W
6 L
6 W
6 W
4 W
6 L
1 L

2
6
1
1 W
5 L
1 W
6 W
2 W
3 L
1 W
3 L
2 W
1 W
6 W
1 W
3 L
3 W
6 W
6 W
3 L
4 L

2
4
4
6
4 W
4 W
3 L
6 W
5 L
1 L

1
1
4
5
2 L
1 W
1 W
3 L
6 L

6
1
5
3 L
5 W
4 L
1 W
2 L
3 L

2
6
3
6 W
4 L
5 L

4
6
2
5 L
5 W
2 W
3 L
2 W
2 W
4 W
2 W
3 L
3 W
2 W
6 W
3 L
6 W
5 L
5 W
5 L
6 W
4 W
5 L
2 W
2 W
6 W
6 W
4 W
6 W
1 L
6 W
3 L
1 L

1
3
4
3 W
4 W
3 W
2 L
1 W
3 W
6 L
4 W
6 L
4 W
5 L
5 W
1 W
1 W
1 W
5 L
4 W
4 W
1 W
5 L
3 W
5 L
5 W
3 W
2 L
5 L

2
5
3
2 W
1 L
1 W
1 L
6 L

3
3
4
2
3 W
6 L
3 W
1 L
1 W
3 W
4 W
5 L
5 W
4 W
5 L
4 W
2 W
4 W
3 W
3 W
2 W
2 W
2 W
4 W
5 L
2 W
6 L
1 L

1
1
6
3
2 L
1 W
3 W
3 W
3 W
4 L
5 L

5
1
6
5 W
1 W
5 W
1 W
3 L
2 L

3
6
4
3 W
6 W
6 W
3 W
1 L
5 L

3
6
6
6
3
6
2
5 L
5 W
5 L
2 W
1 L
4 L

5
1
5
4
4 W
6 L
2 L

5
1
6
5 W
1 W
2 L
1 W
5 W
5 W
3 L
3 W
4 L
5 W
1 W
4 L
1 W
6 W
6 W
1 W
5 W
3 L
2 L

6
2
1
3 L
6 W
4 L
3 L

2
5
1
2 W
6 L
1 W
5 W
2 W
4 L
2 W
4 L
3 L

3
4
1
5 L
3 W
4 W
2 L
5 L

4
2
3
1 L
6 L

1
5
3
4 L
5 W
3 W
4 L
5 W
4 L
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#2
Apr 12, 01:15 PM 2013
2013 04 10 TRNG

WL
WWL
WL
WWWWWWL
LW
LW
LL
WWL
LW
WWL
WL
WL
LL
LL
WWWWL
LW
LL
WWL
LW
LW
LW
WWL

+11 Entering points
-12 Exit points
+7 Break even points

+31 wins
-26 loses
= +5
placed bets 57

2013 04 11 trng

WWL
WL
WL
WWL
LW
LW
WL
LW
WWWL
WL
WL
LW
WWWWL
WWWWL
LW
WL
WWL
LW
WL
LW
LW
LL
LW

+13 Entering points
-3 Exit points
+9 Break even points

+33 wins
-24 loses
= +9
placed bets 58

2013 04 12 TRNG

WL
WWL
WWL
WWWWWWWWL
LW
WWL
LW
WWWWWWWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
LW
LW
WL
WL

+12 Entering points
-0 Exit points
+4 Break even points

+32 wins
-16 loses
= +16
placed bets 48
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#3
Apr 12, 01:16 PM 2013
-
Use skips or play as is.
Regression or flat betting or progression.
Add strict MM rules.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

starkygold

#4
Apr 12, 01:32 PM 2013
explain please. I understand that you play lines but when you start ti play a dozen bet?
wiesbaden-11-04-2011-4
30
24
25
27
9
31
3
13
33
12
21
35
29
30
20
1
31
24
34
24
31
25
13
14
31
19
18
36
35
17
36
16
18
17
14
16
0
15
10
9
4
1
16
25
30
29
29
28
3
3
10
31
13
20
23
22
28
4
0
2
32
16
20
20
28
25
1
35
3
32
35
34
27
12
24
14
10
30
15
2
17
32
28
21
9
33
20
14
31
32
20
7
17
34
35
33
35
35
5
30

RFMAXX

#5
Apr 12, 01:37 PM 2013
the example told us numbers 1 to 6.
is he betting double lines?

Ralph

#6
Apr 12, 02:58 PM 2013
Long post of  some lucky trials, or is it real play?

The best way to fail, is not to try!

Chrisbis

#7
Apr 12, 03:15 PM 2013
Could one of the mods please edit these posts, and put the long string sets of results into a reveal function please?

They make for extremely long scrolling of the page, and reveal was designed just for such an event

cheers.  :thumbsup:

(the bbc code is [reveal] information here [/reveal])
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

Chrisbis

#8
Apr 12, 03:20 PM 2013
Quote from: RFMAXX on Apr 12, 01:37 PM 2013
the example told us numbers 1 to 6.
is he betting double lines?

U mean "A Line = 2 streets"? (or a double street)
I think he IS betting a classic Line.
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

Turner

#9
Apr 12, 03:57 PM 2013
Quote from: Chrisbis on Apr 12, 03:20 PM 2013
U mean "A Line = 2 streets"? (or a double street)
I think he IS betting a classic Line.

Why are we all talking like he cant answer him self?.....dam.n........I'm doing it now!!!

ego

#10
Apr 12, 04:14 PM 2013

6 lines or a dice with six sides ...

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#11
Apr 13, 03:38 AM 2013

OK here is the explanation for does who not understand.
A dice can alternate and show each side once during one cycle.
That is a probability around 98,5 % to happen.

This bet selection bet against that five sides will have one show each during one cycle.
I assume that the probability is around 85% for that to happen or even higher.

To illustrate this you can take a sequence when three lines alternate.
Then you first follow the three lines as an even money bet.
If you win you continue and if you lose you add that new line and bet dozen position.
Now if you win and break even with second attempt, then you restart with the three even money lines.

I have never during my years at forum boards see any public even money bet being so effective.

4
5
2

6 L
2 W
2 W
4 W
1 L
5 W
5 W
4 W
3 L
2 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
1 L
1 W
2 W
5 W
4 W
6 L
6 W
5 W
2 W
3 L
6 L
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ignatus

#12
Apr 13, 03:47 AM 2013
Playing with ECs is a very hopeless effort, but I really like to test this one (and see it fail) your explanation is no good.

There is only R/B. Why so hard to explain in a simple way?
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ego

#13
Apr 13, 03:51 AM 2013

ignatus i don't expect beginners like you to understand ...
I am your EC guru, so what is it that you don't understand ...

Should also mention that the strike ration/variance is around 55% 60% 65%
Trending for domination that compensate for the negative expectation.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ignatus

#14
Apr 13, 03:56 AM 2013
Quote from: ego on Apr 13, 03:51 AM 2013
ignatus i don't expect beginners like you to understand ...
I am your EC guru, so what is it that you don't understand ...

Should also mention that the strike ration/variance is around 55% 60% 65%
Trending for domination that compensate for the negative expectation.

R
B
B
R
B
R
R
R
B
B
B
R
B
B

Now tell me how you would play this. I would be suprised.  ;D
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve
-
Print
Go Up Pages1 2 3 ... 5
User actions