New Methods and Systems....

[Chrisbis]

Isn't it funny, that when U try a new method/system out for the first time, it nearly always wins!
Yet, if U try if for the medium/long term, its bound to lose and lose in a big way!

Strange that!

[vladir]

I don't think it's strange, it's to be expected... In the long run, when up and down imbalances cancel each other, we are left with the house edge...

[Turner]

Isn't it funny, that when U try a new method/system out for the first time, it nearly always wins!
Yet, if U try if for the medium/long term, its bound to lose and lose in a big way!

Strange that!

Ive made this comment may times. First runnings are the strongest.

[Ralph]

All wheels has  not house advantages, they pay 100%.

Some methods, neg prog have a larger probability to win small, and a minor probability to lose big.

If we win 999 times of 1000, we have to be very unlucky to start with the losing session. But it will come.
The methods stands different outcomes, a bad for the method will come. It is good to switch, none will win forever.

A heavy neg prog, a big bankroll, let us stay longer, but at the end lose more, if we see the end.

If we not have more than 50% chance to double the bankroll, we shall not use the method, as we as well can put it on an EC NOZ.

Some start with very low bets, and see it works, then increase the bet. I advice to not do it, as the bankroll becomes fewer in units, and the probability to lose increase  when we play the same way long.

[agesta]

Hi!
I think exactly like you guys.
Therfore i am going to test the systems that now is in proofreader Project Q with just one session each going from first to last and do that 5 times and see what happens.
Maybe thats the way to have 7 -10 systems and just play them one time each and then call it the night.
agesta

[Chrisbis]

@ agesta

My thinking entirely............play many many systems, one after another,
to see if those early/first winners, can be sustained a little longer.

[probasah]

Hi!
I think exactly like you guys.
Therfore i am going to test the systems that now is in proofreader Project Q with just one session each going from first to last and do that 5 times and see what happens.
Maybe that's the way to have 7 -10 systems and just play them one time each and then call it the night.
agesta

This is a very interesting idea, indeed.

[TwoCatSam]

I think it is a great idea to pause a system after a while.  Not while it's winning but when it starts to fail.  Put on on the shelf to rest.  Like us, systems get tired and need a little R&R.

I have been doing this a while with some success.

Samster

[Chris555p]

Hi

I have noted that some of the best system on the forum stands easily the test of time day after day after day. My favourite system is the number four of the system called " Four system I have actually used to make money " shared kindly by Twocatsam". I'm referring here to real live or BM casino; None of these things called rng, or auto roulette......lol lol   


Cheers

Chris

[teo]

Isn't it funny, that when U try a new method/system out for the first time, it nearly always wins!
Yet, if U try if for the medium/long term, its bound to lose and lose in a big way!

Strange that!

MY DEAR CHRISBY,
That is what i'm doing for year now.example..the other night I lost on the same system that was
winning 8 nights in the row.......last night I started a new ones,several of them,and noticed pit boss
and the dealers looking me kind of strangely.....as if I have put them in pat possition......after all
playing each night same continously they know your next move...it's like a chess game.

[ignatus]

so, you admit now all systems fail? xD.......

[agesta]

Hi!
I think exactly like you guys.
Therfore i am going to test the systems that now is in proofreader Project Q with just one session each going from first to last and do that 5 times and see what happens.
Maybe that's the way to have 7 -10 systems and just play them one time each and then call it the night.
agesta

Hi!
Now i have tested each system one time
The system are
1.Deltas second Dozen number repeater system
2.Morrrison`s Zero system
3.Rabbles eight numbers
4.Rafael`s climbing number system
5.Agesta`s dozen
6.Serrano`s Between -sectors
7.Magnas Soft Six-Numbers
8.Fernandos`s Across-to-Zero
I played them with 1 units bets for one singel session
System
1.+21 units in 20spins
2.+15 units in 7 spins
3.+28units in 1 spins
4.+34units in 1 spin
5.+/-0 in 3 spins
6.+28 units in 1spin
7.-36 units in 6 spins
8. -35 units in 5 spins
That would be + 55 units in 44 spins
I will do this 4 more times

agesta

[Turner]

MY DEAR CHRISBY,
That is what i'm doing for year now.example..the other night I lost on the same system that was
winning 8 nights in the row.......last night I started a new ones,several of them,and noticed pit boss
and the dealers looking me kind of strangely.....as if I have put them in pat possition......after all
playing each night same continously they know your next move...it's like a chess game.

Chess is a good analogy.
static play with the same opening is soon defeated. You will get good results for a while then you become predictable.

[Chris555p]

Hi

Some systems may not be in Project Q, but they give very good results as well. For example, The consistent Profit Roulette System.  Those interested can have a go at it, you will be surprised of the results, hit rate.


Chris

[agesta]

Hi

Some systems may not be in Project Q, but they give very good results as well. For example, The consistent Profit Roulette System.  Those interested can have a go at it, you will be surprised of the results, hit rate.


Chris

Hi!
I Think so too i just use the system in Project Q, because they are all well explained by proof and everybody who will can see which systems i use for this Little test.
agesta