New Methods and Systems....

[Chris555p]

Hi Agesta

I agree I also primilarily use what is in Project Q as the explanation given by Proof for the method is great; However, I also look beyond what is in Project Q as from experience I have also found some pearls burried in the forum notwithstading the fact thay they may be in Project Q as such.

Cheers

Chris

[teo]

The advantage I have in my local casino/can't do in Slovenia or Italy,or anywhere else that I know/
that they allow me use of tablet,where I stored about 30 prepared excels of each method on deskopt,
so when I decide/usually when up,but sometimes even down---more rarely/just switch to another method.

[Chrisbis]

Hello all..........and especially my winter friend 'teo'

This is just the conference debate I was looking forward to.
It could almost be a parallel discussion thread for Project Q as excellently presented to us by Proofreader.
The intricate finite analysis of ALL the systems and methods is what we need now, rather like a review.
Proof has started the ball rolling with his speedy 'gain or breakeven'  testing and then depositing into Fort-Knox-Project Q safe.

So its now our job to methodically test these systems in the short & medium term and hone them down until we get around 8-12 methods that can be put into an ultimately bot.

I would like now, to discuss how we make a working study group to achieve this objective.

[Ralph]

We use to get some from "system" we win often and at the end can lose. A bold play a short burst and you lose as usual. but at the time it goes our way it is rewarding. LUCK COUNTS!

I have used an other  account , and I decide to risk a winning I got from Roulette Express ( about 1700 Euro).

Played bold, expect number 5 to hit.  The max permitted payout is 10000.
System play is fun, and not so scary(at lest not from start).

[Ralph]

Streaks are bad or good, there are streaks!  If we use them instead of betting flat on good and higher on bad (neg progression)
we have a delayed risk, we can hit it sooner or lose. A parlay or bold bet, is there really a difference? 

[teo]

Hello all..........and especially my winter friend 'teo'

This is just the conference debate I was looking forward to.
It could almost be a parallel discussion thread for Project Q as excellently presented to us by Proofreader.
The intricate finite analysis of ALL the systems and methods is what we need now, rather like a review.
Proof has started the ball rolling with his speedy 'gain or breakeven'  testing and then depositing into Fort-Knox-Project Q safe.

So its now our job to methodically test these systems in the short & medium term and hone them down until we get around 8-12 methods that can be put into an ultimately bot.

I would like now, to discuss how we make a working study group to achieve this objective.

Don't count on me as far as bots and on line betting is concerned.....am old fashioned winter chap that strongly
don't believe in these modern things.Obama and Putin are knowing what any of them had for brekfast this morning,
and my old fashioned head only imagining what are this roulette mafia is serving to you every day.
Especilly constantly reading here how some got ban for winning some minor dough regulary.....what's the use the
question should arise here.

[teo]

just some way how amm playing even though short last night.

Spin 28 should be number 8 street 5-----/esult would be still same/but since I had to rewrite all this from other excels,
typo errors happens in such sutuations,especially in my years.

[agesta]

Hi!
Now i have tested each system one time
The system are
1.Deltas second Dozen number repeater system
2.Morrrison`s Zero system
3.Rabbles eight numbers
4.Rafael`s climbing number system
5.Agesta`s dozen
6.Serrano`s Between -sectors
7.Magnas Soft Six-Numbers
8.Fernandos`s Across-to-Zero
I played them with 1 units bets for one single session
System
1.+21 units in 20spins
2.+15 units in 7 spins
3.+28units in 1 spins
4.+34units in 1 spin
5.+/-0 in 3 spins
6.+28 units in 1spin
7.-36 units in 6 spins
8. -35 units in 5 spins
That would be + 55 units in 44 spins
I will do this 4 more times

agesta

Hi all!
I have now completed my Little test, not a funny story at all.
You have the names on the system i tested above .
I have tested them 5 times each only 1 session at a time from first to last.
System
1. 3 wins 2 losses -28 units
2. 1 win , 4 losses -129 units
3. 1 win, 4 losses -100 units
4. 1 win, 4 losses -110 units
5. 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss - 1unit
6. 4 wins, 1 loss + 30 units
7. 4 wins , 1 loss +34 units
8. 3 wins , 2 losses -7 units
Total 40 sessions 20 wins , 19 losses and 1 draw
- 311 units
It do not work even if we just play 1 session of each system and then play next system.
Only 2 system in +
I must say that proofreader do a great work here , i have just tested these systems and i am tired,he test different systems all the time,
Hats off for him!!!
Agesta

[Turner]

Hi all!
I have now completed my Little test, not a funny story at all.
You have the names on the system i tested above .
I have tested them 5 times each only 1 session at a time from first to last.
System
1. 3 wins 2 losses -28 units
2. 1 win , 4 losses -129 units
3. 1 win, 4 losses -100 units
4. 1 win, 4 losses -110 units
5. 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss - 1unit
6. 4 wins, 1 loss + 30 units
7. 4 wins , 1 loss +34 units
8. 3 wins , 2 losses -7 units
Total 40 sessions 20 wins , 19 losses and 1 draw
- 311 units
It do not work even if we just play 1 session of each system and then play next system.
Only 2 system in +
I must say that proofreader do a great work here , i have just tested these systems and i am tired,he test different systems all the time,
Hats off for him!!!
Agesta

Agesta.
The key word is tested....not lost. No damage done

[agesta]

Agesta.
The key word is tested....not lost. No damage done

You are right!

[Chris555p]

Hi Agesta and all

If u wish to test more than...... the key board, I'm testing, playing some of the older methods in the forum which are still giving great results despite they are old methods......

If u wish u may try have a go at them, namely.......The Crossplay 5 by Atlantis; The zone by Fender 100.  Thanks to these gentlemen for having shared these great methods.



Cheers

Chris 

[agesta]

Hi Agesta and all

If u wish to test more than...... the key board, I'm testing, playing some of the older methods in the forum which are still giving great results despite they are old methods......

If u wish u may try have a go at them, namely.......The Crossplay 5 by Atlantis; The zone by Fender 100.  Thanks to these gentlemen for having shared these great methods.
Hi Chris555!




Cheers

Chris

Hi Chriss555!
Thanks a lot for the system ,i will test them today if i have the time!
Agesta

[Chris555p]

Hi Agesta

You welcome;  At the time they were placed on the forum, I was not a member of the forum yet......; Therefore, I am learning some of the older methods which seem very good to. These two methods seem very good to me based upon testing results.  Have a go at them when u have time and let me know if you reach the same conclusion as I do. Whilst we are on the subject u may also wish to try the consistent profit system, it gives me good results as well.


Cheers

Chris

[teo]

My last night play with diff. methods.

From spin 199 it should write CCW instead of CW

[rolf-harris]

I don't wish to start a riot, but, isn't playing loads of systems for a short period just the same as playing one system  using Hit and Run?