Check it out

[Carsch]

Interesting that you combined both A & B 

[Jordan]

Indeed. It seems Goofy but intresting.

We don t have to bet on both colours ,we just have to bet the deference,because 0 will kill us

[Carsch]

Indeed. It seems Goofy but intresting.

We don't have to bet on both colours ,we just have to bet the deference,because 0 will kill us

You have a point there. 

[Jordan]

It is losing

[F_LAT_INO]

Indeed. It seems Goofy but intresting.

We don't have to bet on both colours ,we just have to bet the deference,because 0 will kill us

Not where I play.Thats why am call FLAT_

[Hermes]

It is not losing you are losing Jordan. That's big difference. I was thinking about differential betting like Jordan proposal but it performs OK the original way. On Euro roulette is zero no big deal. One loss who cares.
We don't bet colors we bet the behavior of them = streaks / chops. Color is not important but streak or chop is important factor. They balance faster than colors.
Hermes

[keel44]

Differential betting is the way to go.  It is exactly the same.  If a zero does come out, you are saved.  Anyway, I have tried this, and it is just as good as anything I have ever known.  Heremes tweak of course.

Look, you will never beat the house edge with even chances.  If you can better predict when wins and losses are coming, then a money management program can turn to good fortunes.

The way here, with Hermes teak, pits streaking trends versus changing trends.  As long as wins and losses are more predictable, we have a winner.  Time will tell.