Trending Dozens With GLAT Double Dozens Progression

[GLC]

This is an adaptation of Atlantis' system on lines for those of you who would like to try it on double dozens.

Track until you have only 2 dozens/columns in the last 4 spins.
Now bet those 2 dozens/columns using the following GLAT groups:

W  end set at +1.  Bet next set at same unit size.
LWW end set at even.  Bet next set at same unit size.
LWLWWW end set at even.  Bet next set at same unit size.
LWLL  end set at -5.  Bet next set at +1 units to current bet size.
LWLWWL end set at -3.  Bet next set at +1 unit to current bet size.
LL end set at -4.  Bet next set at +1 unit to current bet size.

Remember, we're betting 2 dozens so we will be betting the above units on both dozens.  To play the GLAT progression, I suggest that you only bet 1 time for each trigger.  We can't track for another trigger until the missing dozen hits.  Then we start tracking from it to get our 2 out of 4 dozens. 

Any time we get all 3 dozens in the last 4 spins, we continue tracking.

For those of you who are more aggressive, you can bet for one of the 2 dozens to hit within the next say 4 spins and use the standard double dozen martingale progression of 1-1; 3-3; 9-9; 27-27.  To lose, you need to have 4 of the other dozen to hit in a row.  Also, any zero can replace one of the dozens to make up the 4 losses.

You'll see when playing that you rarely go past the 3rd bet without a win.


Examples:
1213  No bet.  All 3 dozens in the last 4 spins.
1221  This is a trigger for a bet.  We can't look for 2 in 4 until the number 3 dozens finally hits.  So 122112221 still no bet.  We continue: 1221122213  Okay, now we have a break in the 1 and 2 dozen run start tracking from the 3 dozen.
1221122213233  Okay, now we have another trigger to bet for the 1 dozen to hit.

Another example: 133133122332112223132232  The red numbers are triggers and the blue numbers are wins.

[GLC]

This is an adaptation of Atlantis' system on lines for those of you who would like to try it on double dozens.

Track until you have only 2 dozens/columns in the last 4 spins.
Now bet those 2 dozens/columns using the following GLAT groups:

W  end set at +1.  Bet next set at same unit size.
LWW end set at even.  Bet next set at same unit size.
LWLWWW end set at even.  Bet next set at same unit size.
LWLL  end set at -5.  Bet next set at +1 units to current bet size.
LWLWWL end set at -3.  Bet next set at +1 unit to current bet size.
LL end set at -4.  Bet next set at +1 unit to current bet size.

Remember, we're betting 2 dozens so we will be betting the above units on both dozens.  To play the GLAT progression, I suggest that you only bet 1 time for each trigger.  We can't track for another trigger until the missing dozen hits.  Then we start tracking from it to get our 2 out of 4 dozens. 

Any time we get all 3 dozens in the last 4 spins, we continue tracking.

For those of you who are more aggressive, you can bet for one of the 2 dozens to hit within the next say 4 spins and use the standard double dozen martingale progression of 1-1; 3-3; 9-9; 27-27.  To lose, you need to have 4 of the other dozen to hit in a row.  Also, any zero can replace one of the dozens to make up the 4 losses.

You'll see when playing that you rarely go past the 3rd bet without a win.


Examples:
1213  No bet.  All 3 dozens in the last 4 spins.
1221  This is a trigger for a bet.  We can't look for 2 in 4 until the number 3 dozens finally hits.  So 122112221 still no bet.  We continue: 1221122213  Okay, now we have a break in the 1 and 2 dozen run start tracking from the 3 dozen.
1221122213233  Okay, now we have another trigger to betfor the 1 dozen to hit.

Another example: 133133122332112223132232  The red numbers are triggers and the blue numbers are wins.

The above statement in Green should read "for the 2 & 3 dozens to hit".  Sorry about that.

[Chrisbis]

Can one of the Mods/Admin team make the alteration to GLC's original post, to avoid confusion.
Its a genuine error, and we don't need the same error printing Twice!


Cheers

[GLC]

Here's the system.  I've been playing this on my airball machine for quarters.  I'm up over 200 units.  I play the forced win progression.


1-1; 2-2; 3-3; 4-4; 5-5; 6-6; 7-7; etc...


As long as I'm in the hole, I play +1 win or lose until I'm at a new high bank amount.  I never bet more than necessary to reach +1.


Example:  If I just won a 10-10 bet and I'm at -5, my next bet is 6-6.  If I win, I'm +1 so I reset.  If I lose my next bet is 7-7 and I'm back in the forced win progression.


The GLAT works great, it's just a little too safe to be playing it for quarters.


Here's the bet selection process.


We always check the last 4 decisions to decide what to bet on and/or if we can bet.


If we have only 2 dozens in the 4 spins and they have split 2 and 2 like this 2332 or 2233 or 1212 etc... we bet those two dozens.


If we have only 2 dozens in the 4 spins and they have split 1 and 3 like this 2122 or 1333 or 3323 etc... or if we have on 1 dozen in the 4 spins, we bet against the dozen that has hit 3 times or 4 times.


Example: 2122  we bet the 1 & 3 dozens.   1333 we bet the 1 & 2 dozens.  2222  we bet the 1 and 3 dozens etc...


If we have 3 dozens in the last 4 spins, we have no bet.


This is a very easy system to play and it's very effective.


With a little practice you can keep track of the last 4 spins without pen and paper, and other than that all you have to do is keep track of where you are in the forced win progression, which you can do by stacking the appropriate number of chips in front of you.  You also need to keep track of where you are in relation to your previous high bank so you can determine the appropriate bet to keep from winning more than +1.


So far I've never had to bet more than 12-12 and even then I wasn't that much in the hole.  And betting 12-12 is a pretty low bet for double dozens.


I know that the tracking that represents about 50% of the spins makes it appear like you're winning at a stronger pace than you really are because the bets are spread out, but still I think this is worth a short test run by some of you double dozen fanatics.


Enjoy,


GLC

[Tomla021]

Whatever GLC says is the TRUTH!!!

[Chrisbis]

Has anyone botted this Dozens back 4 method?


Superman, have U archived this one??
Just wondered. 

[atlantis]

Hi George,
As a big fan of GLAT this looks to be a good DD selection. And could be strong...

To play the GLAT progression, I suggest that you only bet 1 time for each trigger.  We can't track for another trigger until the missing dozen hits.  Then we start tracking from it to get our 2 out of 4 dozens.

Yes - this seems good way to play it too.

Good Luck,
A.

[GLC]

Whatever GLC says is the TRUTH!!!

Tommy,  Good to see you're still keeping watch on things.


Thumbs up mate.


Georgie

[GLC]

" ... If we have 3 dozens in the last 4 spins, we have no bet..."

This should read "If we have 3 different dozens in the last 4 spins"  In other words, if all three dozens hit at least once in the last for spins, we have no bet.  Keep tracking.

For those of you who like more action, you could make a single dozen bet on the only dozen that hit twice in the last 4 spins.  Example: 1223  here we would normally have no but you could make a single dozen bet on the 2 dozen.  3123  Here we would bet the 3 dozen.  You'd have to keep a separate progression for the single dozen bets.  This option increases the drawdowns a little, but it can also decrease them.  And when it's hitting, it can add substantially to the winnings.


Enjoy,


GLC

What's my preoccupation with double dozens lately?  Must be a phase I'm going through or maybe it's because I'm getting so many PM's about double dozens.  It causes me to think about them a lot.

[GLC]

Adaptation number two thousand three hundred and fifteen.


Our 1st bet is the farthest spun dozen and the penultimate dozen. 
Example:
1  This is the farthest back dozen.
2
2  This is the penultimate dozen.  So we bet on the 1 & 2 dozens.
3 


Our 2nd bet is the penultimate dozen and the last spun dozen.


Example continued:
1
2
2 
3  This is the penultimate dozen.
1  This is the last spun dozen.  So we bet the 1 & 3 dozens 1 time.


Our 3rd bet is the last spun dozen and the farthest back dozen.


Example continued:
1
2
2
3  This is the farthest back dozen.
1
2  This is the last spun dozen.  So we bet the 2 & 3 dozens 1 time.


We continue to rotate our bet selection.  Farthest and penultimate then penultimate and last then last and farthest then farthest and penultimate then penultimate and lastt then last and farthest etc...




If we have the following:
1
2
2
3
3
The 3 dozen is the last.
The 2 dozen is the penultimate.
And the 1 dozen is the farthest.


We're going to use a GLAT type bet progression.


W  This ends an attack.  Result +1 unit.  We bet the same amount on the next attack.
LWW  This ends an attack.  Result even.  We bet the same amount on the next attack.
LWL  This ends an attack.  Result -3 units.  We bet the next attack at +1 unit.
LL  This ends an attack.  Result -4 units.  We bet the next attack at +1 unit.


The above is very simple and effective.


I suggest playing to +10 units with a 50 unit buy-in.




GLC

[GLC]

Oops.  Ignore this post.

[sheki]

what post?

[GLC]

what post?

The one that says Oops!  Ignore this post.


I meant to correct something in the adaptation post and accidentally re-quoted it and since we can no longer delete replys in our topics, I modified it by deleting everything.  But it wouldn't let me post a reply with nothing in the body so I made the body say.  Oops!  Ignore this post.


You could actually ignore this post too.


What happened to the "delete post" option?


GLC

[GLC]

I'd like to post some personal observations regarding systems.


Systems are based on a general idea that can be modified a variety of ways.  One modification is no better than any other. No matter how you tweak a system, there will be favorable streaks and unfavorable streaks.  No matter how you tweak a bet progression, there will be favorable streaks and unfavorable streaks.


Here's some options you might like to consider for this system. 


Instead of betting each combination 1 time and then moving to the next, you could decide to bet each combo 2 times or 3 times before moving.  Or, you could decide to play each combo until you have a loss and then move to the next.  You can catch some pretty good winning streaks doing that.  You could wait until you have 2 losses before moving to the next combo. 


You could play each attack with the same combo and stay with that combo until you lose an attack.  Or, you stay with it until you lose 2 attacks in a row.


You could change the W/L groups for an attack. 


W;  LWW;  LWL;  LL  is pretty basic. 


You could go to WW; LWLWWW; LWLL; LLL; LWLWWL; etc...  This makes for longer attacks at the same bet size and might suit your liking more.


All I'm trying to say is that we can adapt a playing method to suit our liking and playing style.  There's nothing cast in stone with any system.  Every system has more numbers that will cause it to lose verses causing it to win when the payout ratio is factored in.  This is why people are always tweaking systems.  They hit the losing streak and they're trying to avoid it.  It can't be done. 


So, don't get too hung up on some of the minor details in a system.  In the long run they don't make that much difference.


GLC

[Tomla021]

Mr GLC
I always take a look see at your and other systems---I pay some extra look sees at yours......because they are for the most part good (you might have a semi grail or two in your posts), then I bring it down to playability in an hour or so real time..But I will never turn my head from one of your ideas---your issue is your so prolific-lol ,,, so it becomes he's more a progression guy or etc etc.......But if your beating that air ball machine in Zona weekly or monthly ----Bless you!!!!!!!!!