DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

[albalaha]

It is a failure, atleast for me it didn't work.

[esoito]

Is that the consensus?

Gone very quiet, all of a sudden!

[malcop]

Hi All,

Sorry my fault been busy with work and fort to post a couple of emails from don.

-----------------------------

Dear Philip,

Attached herewith is a simplified winning process after rigorous data testing for a few days using the existing program. I developed the relevant pages in the form of a Tutorial that the people can learn it with a demonstration. Wagering commencement has to be done manually using the detection system. Please upload the attachment onto the discussion forum on behalf of me. I request the players to test it out with their data sets and post the results. If it works for them I will request Dulan to maka the changes in the process after the 14th May. Otherwise I do not want to waste his efforts to develop a new software. Thus, it is absolutely essential to have the feedback from the users.

I applied this on the toughest data set I have encountered and the system yielded a +47.

Best Regards

Don

--------------------------


Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Update email

-----------------------

Dear Philip,

After a thorough analysis we realized the low returns were attributable to the point of wagering commencement. Thus, we experimented a new wagering commencement and a restart criteria, which is remarkably better than the old strategy. The criteria is clearly elaborated in the book.

Please inform the players to try the enhanced version. Also, the wagering decision has to be taken manually and the columns are rearranged to be very user friendly to the naked eye.

Please upload this on behalf of me.

Best Regards

Don

----------------

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All

Latest update

--------------------------

Dear Gentlemen,

With confidence I am forwarding this latest version of the System RCLV. Please take me seriously as some of you did not believe it.

Best Regards

Don

---------------------

Dear Philip,

After a rigorous data testing now I have discovered the most appropriate wagering commencement conditions for the Macro and Micro RCLV strategies. Attached herewith is the latest instruction manual to be uploaded. The players do not have to read everything to use the system but they must read only page 12 for the Macro Strategy and pages 13 - 15 for the Micro Strategy. It is most advisable to do practice demonstration exercises to be familiar with the System RCLV, prior to using it. Once wagering is commenced, they can simply be driven by the System. Now, the level of confidence is such that I can give an assurance signed in blood that it will work and the players would be satisfactorily up on the deal in the long run!

Also, it is noteworthy to mention that System RCLV is much more reliable than the System DNAR and also the Micro Strategy of System RCLV is safer than the Macro Strategy.

Please upload the attached latest E-book for the benefit of the regular users numbering to about 50 a day. Now, the players may confidently circulate this among their colleagues. It will be greatly appreciated if they could provide me with feedbacks either through the discussion forum or by sending an email to darcolonne@yahoo.com.

Good luck to the Roulette Players around the world. Let us turn around the Roulette Tables around the world.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks

malcop

[albalaha]

It is again, a very big claim. Need to be tested.

[malcop]

It is again, a very big claim. Need to be tested.

Of course it needs to be tested, but how many people have got the balls to put their neck on the block like Don!

I do not know if this system works or not as Don says I have not tested the update yet, but I applaud him for the courage of his convictions!

And wanting to share with all and nothing in return for himself.

[albalaha]

I agree that he has not charged for it but if it doesn't win as promised, it is not good for free even. Lets test results come.

[esoito]

Of course it needs to be tested, but how many people have got the balls to put their neck on the block like Don!

I do not know if this system works or not as Don says I have not tested the update yet, but I applaud him for the courage of his convictions!

And wanting to share with all and nothing in return for himself.

YES!!!  I strongly second that. 

Kindly and charitably stated, Malcop.

Continual carping criticism is misplaced at the moment and I would like to see it stop for the time being.

Of course the system needs to be tested -- comprehensively.

Until that has been done, blanket criticisms are unwarranted, unfair and without foundation.

Meanwhile, potential testers will be encouraged by this extract:

"The players do not have to read everything to use the system but they must read only page 12 for the Macro Strategy and pages 13 - 15 for the Micro Strategy. "

[Red Nickels]

the author is seriously deranged.  I have followed his work from the first edition of the roulette system and even helped him with it.  all he does is keep adding more and more rules that will not make his system work, though he thinks they will.  no one can even follow it anymore.

[esoito]

The author is seriously deranged.  I have followed his work from the first edition of the roulette system and even helped him with it.  all he does is keep adding more and more rules that will not make his system work, though he thinks they will.  no one can even follow it anymore.

MODERATOR'S WARNING

Red...You may be right; you may be wrong.

Given that this is a new, as yet untested version, with a simplified approach then I suggest you keep your powder dry until test results are in.

And unless you have evidence of derangement then you are skating on very thin ice indeed.

Look up the word LIBEL in your dictionary.

Unless you can provide professional evidence (not just your opinion) then kindly post a prompt apology, or you'll be on the receiving end of consequencies.

[malcop]

The author is seriously deranged.  I have followed his work from the first edition of the roulette system and even helped him with it.  all he does is keep adding more and more rules that will not make his system work, though he thinks they will.  no one can even follow it anymore.

I have to say I tried the Macro method and it was OK but it was only a short test but I cannot follow the Micro method, I am sure it is easy to Don but it is not as easy as Don thinks for the rest of us, but I will see if I can get my head around it, only in the interest of being fair.

[Red Nickels]

Don't have a cow man.  ok just delete my post.  sorry I didn't say in my opinion the man is deranged (slight exaggeration.)  but I have seen him reverse engineer his system a hundred times to fit his results, and I have read his-- in my opinion-- ridiculous claims and statements.  and I have spent a lot of time with his-- in my opinion-- worthless system.  and if he thinks anyone can follow all his rules anymore, then-- in my opinion-- he is a bit crazy.  but hey-- roulette makes us all a bit crazy, doesn't it?  one might say it's a bit crazy to think we can beat it.  and insanity has often been defined as doing the same thing over and over and thinking you will get different results.  which has been going on quite a bit and for quite a long time, at these roulette forums.

[esoito]

OK. I'll take that as an apology.

Hopefully Mr Colonne will accept it as such.

We must all be very careful not to make libellous comments in the heat of the moment.

To be safe:  always play the ball and NOT the man.

In other words, aim any critical comments at a system or method only, and definitely not at the person who created the system.

Libel is basically defined as false and malicious written comments

Slander applies to the verbal equivalent.

Both are actionable in many jurisdictions.

[Red Nickels]

perhaps you could delete replies 309 (starting with my mean one) through to this one before any more are added to this thread, and then we can all be happy again.