DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update
------------------------------

Dear Philip,

First and foremost, let me thank you for facilitating and taking my work forward for the benifit of everybody. There were a few very encouraging offline email communications, in regard to this latest edition.

The Micro Strategy has a few simple calculations to be made and the Marco Strategy involves only making a fundamental observation. So, those who are weak in their numerical apptitude can simply resort to playing the Macro Strategy, being strictly guided by the system subject to the exit and restart rule.

Also, those who want to play it in the safest way can commence wagering only if both Macro and Micro wagering commencement criteria are met.

Please upload this comment. 

Best Regards

Don

----------------------------

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest Update

-----------------------------

Dear Philip,

Using the fundamentals in both Micro and Macro, the player can form his own convincing variations. This morning, I played the Colombo BBM casino and made a gain of +28 chips. I now use two further risk mitigation rules for Macro that I commence wagering only if the corresponding GD value is also positive and restart the system when all NSO values simultaneously become negative. It further reduces the risk but I want to test it thourouly before I incoroprate them into the manual.

Best Regards

Don

---------------------

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update from Don

----------------------------------------

Dear Philip,

Based on your idea to combine Micro and Macro entry conditions, Dulan and I discovered a very good strategy which produces the best ever results since the inception of our research. We created a separate software link to use this HYBRID system which is simply system driven. We worked till 1.30 in the night yesterday and uploaded the new software without the EXIT condition. During the weekend, we will incorporate the exit condition as well, so that it will be a fully fledged user friendly software package. For the time being, ask the users to strictly go by the exit condition stated below. Please upload the file and the contents of this e-mail on my behalf.


COMPULSORY EXIT RULE:



·         Exit upon reaching either (a) a gain of 10 or more or (b) a loss of 7 or more or (c) at the spin following the Critical Spin and RESTART with the last six spin outcomes.



DEMO-19: 25-29-20-9-30-33 gives the value 2 under STGY on the 5th and the 6th lines. The value on the 6th line under GDI2 is 7 (DEMO-18). Then the three following spin outcomes 17-18-13 give net gain of +9. If the next spin directed (ACLM) to wager for comes right on both the Dozens and the Columns, the gain would exceed the value +10. Therefore, the next spin shall be treated as a Compulsory Exit Point, and the system must be restarted.



Best Regards



Don

[1] The value to be used for the purpose of observing the Critical Spin.

----------------------------------------------------

This is just a re-cap on what the potential win would be for each combination of winning chips:

1 Win = 03 Chips Returned â€" 4 Chips = -1
2 Win = 06 Chips Returned â€" 4 Chips = +2
3 Win = 09 Chips Returned â€" 4 Chips = +5
4 Win = 12 Chips Returned â€" 4 Chips = +8

Critical Spin

If you are at +6 and the bets placed would yield +5 if all bets won you would exit win or lose because if all bets placed won you would have had a session win of +11.

So when working out if you are at Critical Spin look at if the next bet placed would take you over +10 or more if all potential bets won, if yes you are at Critical Spin.

Thanks

malcop

[MyTHOS_R]

During the past 2-3 months, even though I was not participating too much, I was keeping an eye into the evolution of DNA of roulette.

I have a simple question after almost 1.000.000 changes and modifications... The final hybrid version of MICRO and MACRO gives a sign for betting EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of the initial system created by Mr Colonne. How on earth is this possible and on which basis can anyone evere trust something that has changed exactly 100% (OR WE COULD SAY IN OPPOSITE 180 degrees direction!)?

To be more specific, if the initial system of DNA (based on Trylobit's excell worksheet) would suggest at some point a wagering of, let's say AB & 2L, the final version NOW suggests to wager 2C & KL! It is obvious that one of the two is completely wrong...

My experience with the initial system was splendid, it worked almost perfectly, while the final hybrid system fails almost every time...

How come Don insists that the final version is better? And if he is sure about that, does he now admit that the first system was a mistake? I mean, I had some faith in this system believing that it is based upon mathematical equations and on the law of third... I'd kindly request to Mr Colonne to explain to us which was the mistake in the first place...

We are talking about maths here.. 1+1=2... or maybe not?

Thanks in advance

[chrisbis]

I think it more likely to be this equation.

(+1) + (-1)= and the answer is there for all to see.

It does seem a remarkable turn-around of events.

Perhaps a few members here could set up a testing group, and let run a full test in a chosen group of casino interfaces (Some real Live, some Air-ball and maybe one RNG) and see where we area all at with this DNA program.

I'd be up for running a dedicated test sequence if we could all agree a test strategy/size/formate, and how the results were to be published.

[malcop]

Hi All,

Yes I believe that some form of structured testing is needed, only then can we say once and for all if this method works or not.

I have attached a spreadsheet of 11 sessions I played over the weekend on William Hill slingshot, 10 winning sessions out of the 11 sessions played, I ended at +41, averaging 4 units per session.

This was a very quick test and I am in no way saying that the winning trend I had would continue.

If I can find more time this week to do more testing I will post, but have studying to do.

Thanks

malcop

[albalaha]

Philip (Malcop) is a very mature player. If there is a winning of 10 amongst 11 sessions by a single technique, it is definitely worth looking very seriously.

[malcop]

Philip (Malcop) is a very mature player. If there is a winning of 10 amongst 11 sessions by a single technique, it is definitely worth looking very seriously.

Hi Albalah,

Yes I think it needs looking into further, but I could have just been very lucky, I think this system you will find it is 3 steps forward and 2 steps back!

Use between 5-10 sessions buy-ins of 15 units so 150 units would give you 10 sessions more than enough to prove if it works or not.

Oh I forgot to say the RCLV Hybrid has now been updated with the start/exit points.  So all you will have to do is enter the numbers and the software will do the rest.  Please keep a careful eye on when the software tells you to reset and wager.

Read pages 12-15 of the manual, and if you start or reset it means you enter the last 5 numbers spun.

Thanks

malcop

[vundarosa]

7 sections with past actuals from two days ago:

*section 1:  -8u
*section 2:  +4u
*section 3:  -7u
*section 4:  -7u
*section 5:  -9u
*section 6:  +12u
*section 7:  -5u

doesn't look too convincing.
This was with the Hybrid software

vundarosa

[vundarosa]

"Read pages 12-15 of the manual, and if you start or reset it means you enter the last 5 numbers spun."

------------------

Aha!, will test again with the same spins and post back results

vundarosa

[malcop]

"Read pages 12-15 of the manual, and if you start or reset it means you enter the last 5 numbers spun."

------------------

Aha!, will test again with the same spins and post back results

vundarosa

Yes when the software indicates a reset, you must click the reset button it will clear all the numbers you have entered effectively starting you from scratch.  Then you enter the last 5 numbers and wait for the next number to spin once you have 6 numbers the software will indicate if you have a wager or a reset, if wager you continue following the betting advice, if reset then you must click the reset button again and re-enter the last 5 numbers and wait for the next number to be spun giving you six numbers that's it simple.

Thanks

malcop

[vundarosa]

"Read pages 12-15 of the manual, and if you start or reset it means you enter the last 5 numbers spun."

------------------

Aha!, will test again with the same spins and post back results

vundarosa

-----------------------------------------

Ok, taking the same spins, entering the last 5 numbers when reseting or starting gives 11 sections.

*section 1:  +1u
*section 2:  -7u
*section 3:  -7u
*section 4:  -2u
*section 5:  -7u
*section 6:  +4u
*section 7:  -8u
*section 8:  +15u
*section 9:  -3u
*section 10:  +4u
*section 11:  -5u

total loss -15u

vundarosa

[malcop]

Hi All

----------------------

Dear Philip,

Dulan incorporated two reset buttons onto the program and the RCLV-HYBRID System is fully automated now. Also, after making rigorous realitly testing  based on your observations, I incorporated one simple control to the program that if the NSO corresponding to the STGY is -4, not to commence wagering as an additional precautionary measure.

With these two improvements, all such projects come to an end and I will leave it for other researchers to take my work forward and create an opinion in regard to the Law of the Third and the three regulatory patterns identified by me. I am sure that an expert in Artificial Intelligence could do wonders with the observations made in this tedious Fundamental Research.

There was a full page article about me, the Law of the Third and the Systems DNAR & RCLV yesterday (9th June 2011) in a London based Sri Lankan Newspaper circulated free of charge. The electronic version is available in WWW.NEWSLANKA.NET

My work would not have gone that far, had not it been for you and I wish to express my sincere gratitude to all those who defended me at difficult time and extended enormous cooperation and understanding by testing data, making suggestions etc. Also, Dulan is the live-wire behind this exercise and I wish to express my special thanks to him for all those sleepless nights he spent with me, despite his busy work and study schedules.  With this e-mail, the war I fought since March 2008 comes to and I wish to silence the guns. Best of Luck to all of you!

Best Regards

Don

PLEASE POST THIS TO THE FORUM

Don

-------------------------

Thanks

malcop

[vundarosa]

Hi All

----------------------

Dear Philip,

Dulan incorporated two reset buttons onto the program and the RCLV-HYBRID System is fully automated now. Also, after making rigorous realitly testing  based on your observations, I incorporated one simple control to the program that if the NSO corresponding to the STGY is -4, not to commence wagering as an additional precautionary measure.

With these two improvements, all such projects come to an end and I will leave it for other researchers to take my work forward and create an opinion in regard to the Law of the Third and the three regulatory patterns identified by me. I am sure that an expert in Artificial Intelligence could do wonders with the observations made in this tedious Fundamental Research.

There was a full page article about me, the Law of the Third and the Systems DNAR & RCLV yesterday (9th June 2011) in a London based Sri Lankan Newspaper circulated free of charge. The electronic version is available in WWW.NEWSLANKA.NET

My work would not have gone that far, had not it been for you and I wish to express my sincere gratitude to all those who defended me at difficult time and extended enormous cooperation and understanding by testing data, making suggestions etc. Also, Dulan is the live-wire behind this exercise and I wish to express my special thanks to him for all those sleepless nights he spent with me, despite his busy work and study schedules.  With this e-mail, the war I fought since March 2008 comes to and I wish to silence the guns. Best of Luck to all of you!

Best Regards

Don

PLEASE POST THIS TO THE FORUM

Don

-------------------------

Thanks

malcop

--------------

barf!, still losing the same that's for sure.

25 sections
Loss: -31 units

vundarosa

[trebor]

Reading between the lines I think he's saying "I can't make it work so I'm giving up".

Robert