DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

[malcop]

Hi all

Latest update

------------


Dear Philip,
 
Pardon me for my silence for a few days. I was heavily involved in testing and improving the SBS day and night and now I have completed it. I have been wagering with SBS online with real money and I have achieved remarkable success. In fact I like SBS the best because of the investment risk is less (50%) to be exact, inside wagering is possible, zero risk does not bother me and most importantly, it gives the flexibility of discovering indogenous methodologies such as diagonal wagering.
 
I extensively tested diagonal wagering and now finalized it. The players are grumbling about not having demonstration examples and now they are all there. The players also must patiently try to read a sentence at a time and understand the points. All the diagonal observations are working beautifully but they must be manually advocated. Also, I have incoroprated session termination guidelines after having tested the trends. Another distinct advantage with SBS is that you need only a short break after exiting from a session and the idle times are much less as the current wagering strategy changes very frequently.
 
There are two reasons as to why I don ot want to incorporate the diagonal logic to the main software at this juncture. The first being, it is purely observation based and I cannnot still understand the logic behind it. The second reason being, I want the players to experience it and post either favourable or unfavourable comments and then only I can request Dulan to incorporate that also into the program.
 
My recommendation to anyone is to use the SBS, which is the safest out of all strategies.  When I look at the number of visitors to my website, from 9th June upto today, people from 26 countries all over the world have started using it. 
 
Best Regards
 
Don

--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Philip Malcolm <malcop.eb@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Philip Malcolm <malcop.eb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SBS
To: "AJITH COLONNE" <darcolonne@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 11:30 PM

Hi Don,

As you can see from the forum posts no one can follow what to do to play SBS, and I have to admit neither can I, I am still concerned that you have to update two links at the same time with SBS that makes it very complicated to play.

You have to understand that what seems easy to you is not easy to other people, this is causing a lot of confusing and frustation for forum members and myself, you have seen on the forum for the SBS to be fully automated as I have asked you many times before.

Thanks

Philip

---------

Thanks

Malcop

[vundarosa]

In testing so far anyone had more than 7 losses, having to go to 8th step for a win?!

vundarosa

[MyTHOS_R]

Hi there all.

I've studied Don's latest version of SBS and it still is EXTREMELY HARD to read, understand and follow. Even with the examples he uses you need a lot of imagination, creativity and back-and-forth reading just to GUESS what he is trying to state!... Not to mention that there is a mistake at DEMO 11, where he says that NSO is +5, while IT IS -4!

So, until Don makes us finally the favor and simplify his guidelines (instead of keeping the method just to himself-Don, don't forget that here it is a roulette forum AND NOT a HIGH-TECH or NASA SCIENCE forum!), let's keep testing methods that exploit the DNA but with some tweaks!

First of all, Vundarosa, if still you have not come to a higher step than the 7th, this is a good sign, since we have margin up to the 12 the. Myself, I have not got higher than the 8th so far. If anyone overcomes the 10-12th step, please report, so that we abandon the progression method. However, I came up a far safer method, betting at two dozens OR two columns at the same time with the progression 1:1-3:3-9:9-27:27.
The trigger can be either a simple entry point by HYBRID or a 2x indication. We bet according to what software directs us, with the only tweak that we BET ONLY ON THE 2 DOZENS OR ONLY ON THE 2 COLUMNS for 4 times ahead with progression, aiming at the target that HYBRID will not come wrong for both of the dozens (or columns) for 4 consecutive times. It might be a better idea to start wagering ONLY when a 2x sign occurs (start betting with the dozen - or column- suggested and any other of your preference) and continue betting as directed by the system (ONLY on the two dozens OR the two columns). That is because we all agree that the possibility of the system coming right is higher when a 2x sign occurs.

You can come up yourself with any similar idea and share it with us. The point (target) of all the methods that I propose is the same: WE TRUST that the system will come right at least ONCE within a narrow group of spins (where it has indeed proved it highly succeeds), since it is supposed to give us an edge against the wheel.

Cheers.

[MyTHOS_R]

During my latest 2 dozen tweak testing, I've come to a remarkable observation that is really promising...

Within a DNA UNSUCCESSFUL HYBRID session, that normally (if we bet naturally, by the way the system suggests wagering dozens AND columns at the same time) would lose the whole bankroll of 10 units, the tweak system that was targeting EVERY TIME ON ONLY ONE OF THE SUGGESTED DOZENS WITH PROGRESSION, earned gradually 5 units (winning a unit every 1-2 spins).

It's worth testing.

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update from Don
---------------------------

Dear Philip,   

After having read through the comments posted by the form members and rigorous testing of data, I decided to remove the HYBRID Link.

However, I simplified the e-book.

Demo 11 does not have a problem but it was not written well. The new simplified manual will be uploaded by Dulan within the next one or two days.   

I devoted a day and tested something today.

One of the major shortcomings of the existing RCLV system was continuing with the dominant strategy. I tried numerous alterntives but I was not successful.

However, I discovered the strategy today. It is highly mathematical. I being a graduate in Mathematics can do the observations in my mind within seconds but I am sure an average person cannot do that within the short interval available within two spins.

I tried it with Smart Live Casino on free play mode and I predicted all first four spins quite accurately and gained +14, before they cut me off the internet (I am sure their computers detect my portal id).

In the present RCLV methodologies, the strategy for the next spin is derived from the NCG but in the new method it is decided from the three GDI columns.

I am going to test this live from tomorrow (today the casinos are closed in Colombo for the Full Moon Day, which is a religious holiday).

If the strategy works, I have to sit with Dulan and redesign the SBS Link, as the new method is based on a spin-by-spin calculation. I think this is the missing part of the Holy Grail, as it worked extremely well on the largest data set I had.   

Until such time, I will keep my fingers crossed. I would not tax Dulan's time without testing it adequately.

I am sure that the forum members are now convinced of two facts

(a) the prevalence of the Law of the Third and

(b) the existance of the three Regulatory Patterns.

The only issue is how to explore the winning strategy in context. I think I am there.

Also, they must realize the fact that no genius in the world can come out with a perfect product at the outset, as continuous improvement is the key to success.

I developed the DNAR strategies based on XL spread sheet observations. The RCLV strategies would not have been possible, had not Dulan developed the software product.

Now, I am making highly advanced observations in perfecting the strategy using the software.   

I wish to give an assurance to the forum members that I will not give up until I find the long term winning strategy!   

Best Regards   

Don

------------------

Thanks

malcop

[esoito]

ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE

That last letter from Don makes it pretty clear this IS VERY MUCH A WORK IN PROGRESS. [And that's something I have mentioned before.]

In which case, please ensure any criticism is polite, constructive and -- above all -- helpful.

Until the strategy is finalised, my delete finger will take action on any more posts that simply say it's a dud...it won't work...or similar, vexatious comments!

[Hotspot]

What is DNA of roulette mean
Thanks
Hotspot

[trebor]

I implied it was a dud and would never work but only after Don said he had gone as far as he could with it.

At that point I couldn't make it work. It's great that he is keen to carry on and I hope he wins through.

Trebor

[esoito]

What is DNA of roulette mean
Thanks
Hotspot

It's the name of a Dozens/Law of the Third method from Don Colonne.

The method is still under development and testing.

[Reading the posts from the beginning of the thread will give you more details, of course.

But if English is not your 'strong' language then you will not find it easy.]

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest Update

-------------------------

Dear Philip, 

After two days of rigorous testing, I am of the view that the SBS STRATEGY TWO (I am announcing for the first time) is more effective than the MACRO and SBS STRATEGY ONE.

Attached herewith is the latest e-book Dulan has already uploaded. The wagering commencement logic is there but it is a bit of a tedious mathematical calculation.

Only a person with a mathematical aptitidue can advocate it manually.   

I am also going out of Colombo for two days and I will be back only on Tuesday night.

Dulan also is fully occupied until the same day. Therefore, he committed a few hours to complete the project by writing two subroutine programs to incorporate the SBS STRATEGY TWO.   

However, we will try our best to incorporate the full logic into the system and provide a visual guide to wager, just as the other two programs, during the course of this week.   

It will be greatly appreciated if a forum member with a mathematical aptitude could do some testing and post a few comments, until we complete the software program.

I have included a demo example there to understand the concept.

The limits of the interval were determined after an extensive analysis by taking numerous previous patterns into consideration.     

Best Regards   Don

------------

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update

---------------

Dear Philip,    I have been indulged in rigorous testing of data and disocvered that by using the GD values and deciding on the wagering strategy is much more effective than using the present SBS methodology.    Meanwhile, we discovered a new and a highly effective way of doing inside wagering with 16 smaller value chips per spin. It is clearly illustrated under the Diagonal Strategy in the attached e-book. Dulan is in the process of incorporating the new logic into the system and we should be able to upload the new software within the next two weeks.    Meanwhile, I want the Diagonal Strategy to be tested by the forum members with the new inside wagering strategy. Diagonal Strategy is purely observation based and it does not involve any mathematics. It will be greatly appreciated if the players could test it and post the results. Based on such feedback we can decide upon even using same inside wagering methodolgy for the new SBS strategy as well.    Best Regards   Don

------------------


Thanks

malcop

[MyTHOS_R]

.. Meanwhile, I want the Diagonal Strategy to be tested by the forum members with the new inside wagering strategy. Diagonal Strategy is purely observation based and it does not involve any mathematics. It will be greatly appreciated if the players could test it and post the results. Based on such feedback we can decide upon even using same inside wagering methodolgy for the new SBS strategy as well...   
------------------

Unfortunately, the above desire of Don's cannot be fulfilled, simply because that NOBODY can practically apply the SBS diagonal method. Mr Colonne has done his best to describe the procedure, but it is still TOO FAR COMPLICATED. Even a mathematician would be in trouble trying to fully understand and implement the whole thing to the letter. If anyone has tried and really made this, please describe us the simple way and post your results (although I strongly believe there is no such person so far).

We've been through this a lot of times...Philip, it seems that ONLY YOU (being in a closer and frequent contact wth Don) can make him understand that the SBS method is impossible to follow, apply and test, EXCEPT OF COURSE it would be incorporated into a software link. Please, DO SO, because otherwise this does no lead anywhere! Testing will NEVER take place under such conditions.

[malcop]

Unfortunately, the above desire of Don's cannot be fulfilled, simply because that NOBODY can practically apply the SBS diagonal method. Mr Colonne has done his best to describe the procedure, but it is still TOO FAR COMPLICATED. Even a mathematician would be in trouble trying to fully understand and implement the whole thing to the letter. If anyone has tried and really made this, please describe us the simple way and post your results (although I strongly believe there is no such person so far).

We've been through this a lot of times...Philip, it seems that ONLY YOU (being in a closer and frequent contact wth Don) can make him understand that the SBS method is impossible to follow, apply and test, EXCEPT OF COURSE it would be incorporated into a software link. Please, DO SO, because otherwise this does no lead anywhere! Testing will NEVER take place under such conditions.

Hi MyThos_R,

I have tried many times to make Don understand that as far as I am aware no one can follow his method manualy, but I will try my best to make Don understand the point that you have made again.

Thanks

Malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update from Don.

-------------------------

Dear Philip,    Despite the fact that we have been silent for some time at our end, we tested thousands of records with the newest wagering commencement strategy using the GD values and finalized it yesterday. It is a dramatic improvement, over the current SBS Strategy. After making rigorous observations on the diagonal strategy, we abandoned it after making hundreds of observations as such behaviour is logically inexplicable and quite npredicatable.    Dulan is going to start modifying the computer porgram from tomorrow and we are planning to upload the newest system on Friday the 12th August. I just want the forum members to be kept informed of this most reliable strategy, among everything what we developed and offered so far. With the uploading of this new software link, we decided to remove the DNA Links which are not that much effective. Only the DNA e-book will be left for anyone to see the evolution process of the newest strategy.    By copy to Dulan, I am requesting to convert and upload the latest 10th edition I just sent, prior to the launch of the new software product.    Best Regards   Don

-------------------------------------

Thanks

Philip

[RouletteExplorer]

When a person is making a new system based on maths or anything , he starts testing it.
After testing the original system that he-she created he finds out soon or later that it fails on the long run.
Then he is starting making modification the one next to the other .
After testing all those new modifications , he finally finds out that all those modifications are leading him-she to bet ALL THE NUMBERS.
And as we all know by betting all the numbers the only thing that we must have is a loss.

this is exactly what is happening to Don right now....soon or later he will also find out that he must bet all the numbers.
So his last email will be
"I am sorry for giving you hopes. Roulette is truly unbeatable "

I pray this email will never come to our screen , but absolut Maths can never lie.