DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

[MyTHOS_R]

Don must learn to test his systems on at least 1.000.000 samples before making such a huge claims.

Dear friend "Roulette explorer",

you say that, because you have not understood Don's NEW WAY of thinking yet!

It is now clear that Mr Colonne has simply introduced a novel way of testing roulette! Instead of testing 1.000.000 spins on a system, he suggests 1.000.000 methods for testing a few samples!!


Please, guys, don't get me wrong (Don, keep up your good work, you still have a lot till you reach your 1.000.000 versions goal!), It's just that in the midlle of economical crisis, the only thing that the governments have left us doing for free is breathing and making humor, so let's hope we will not lose that too! haha!

cheers!

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update from Don,

-----------------------------

Dear Philip,    I am having remarkable success at my end with live spinning mode and I disagree with the comments posted to the forum except for Philip's comments. What he says is right. Very often, we get over +10 sessions. Therefore, based on Philip's observations, I introduced new exit rules to prevent losses. I am going over to Dulan's house in a while to incorporate these new exit rules and then upload it tonight itself. After that, let us leave it in the hands of only those who want to use it.    New Exit Rules:    ·         If the highest gain recorded is less than +11, exit after a loss of 7 or more. ·         If the highest gain recorded is greater than +10 and less than +16, exit after a loss of 6 or more.
·         If the highest gain recorded is greater than +15 and less than +21, exit after a loss of 5 or more.
·         If the highest gain recorded is greater than +20, exit after a loss of 4 or more.
·         If none of the above exit points are reached, exit after the 41^st spin (42^nd spin for American Roulette).
 
Also, there is one last acid test the players can perform. Enter all the past records available on the electronic panel and see whether the session is a winning trend or a losing trend. Only if it is a winning trend, the player may either continue with the same session until an exit point is reached or commence a new session. I will facilitate a RST6 button to commence a session with the last 6 numbers, in such situations. Any casino will provide at least 10 past spins and some show around 15 to 16 spins.   I thank all forum members for all the adverse comments posted for having kept the forum going. If anyone is of the view that this system is a failure, I humbly request them not to use it or to waste time on it. However, please be informed that I have not tested this for autospin and RNG. 
 
Please post this to the forum on behalf of me. 
 
Best Regards
 
Don


-------------------


Thanks


malcop

[RouletteExplorer]

The tests of mine was only on real spins....
Any system shows its power in testing....and this one has already showed everything...

I really appriciate Dons efforts but I don t like the huge promisses and glory phrazes...

[RouletteExplorer]

Ok I just tested 410 spins with the new tweak of the new exits and resets that Don made.

Result of 410 spins = +6
Biggest down = -46

This new reset is making the system a little better as it seems....but still its not enough.

The balance was going Up and DOWN and in 410 spins a result of only +6 after a BIG -46 chips down is terrible!
I was +52(I was happy..LoL) and then it went to +6 with a very fast and continious down.....no advantage at all....so everything were pure luck as with any system that hits 1st a nice fluxuation and then a bad one.

The other thing that I noticed is that almost all the time the system does this:
After a win on a 2 doz or 2 col bet it bets the winner with 2 chips and if it will lose that bet it is also betting the other 2 and if it wins it then bat again the winner with 2 chips and so on.....

Also if the Dna 1 day (LoL) will be tweaked to be a winner , I don't know if it will be playable in a real casino becase there are times that after a RESET it needs 1-20 new spins to make a desision where to bet....and in a Casino 20 spins can be 1 hour without betting!!!!

I saw enough with this tweak when I had the BIG DOWN of -46 chips.....but if someone likes he can test and post feedback

thanks.

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest up date

---------------------

Dear Philip,    The new version is uploaded. I tested many data samples that I had taken from the MGM and the forum members appear to be right, that it is not too good. However, there was an adverse comment which caught my eye susggesting to bet for the reverse! Dulan and I worked on that idea and we were able to comeout with something very reasonable, when a peak drop of 4 or more occurs (we terminate after a peak drop of 7) to go for inverse wagering, while session termination is determined based on the regular wagering. It appears to be working extremely well that the ultimate loss that could be anything between 7 - 10 chips become either marginal losses of around 2 - 3 or gains of around 1 - 2 in many of the sessions. There is something that I have understood in life. The sinical remarks made by the others lead to good ideas. I am so thankful to the forum members for putting my thinking on track to make things better for them, at no cost to them.    We will be sitting down to incorporate this new idea tomorrow evening. Once that is done, I will keep you informed.    Please post this comment to the forum, because despite all adverse comments, the members have not given up my work. Otherwise they would not be testing what I upload.    Best Regards   Don 

-------

Thanks

malcop

[RouletteExplorer]

""""However, there was an adverse comment which caught my eye susggesting to bet for the reverse! Dulan and I worked on that idea and we were able to comeout with something very reasonable, when a peak drop of 4 or more occurs (we terminate after a peak drop of 7) to go for inverse wagering, while session termination is determined based on the regular wagering. It appears to be working extremely well that the ultimate loss that could be anything between 7 - 10 chips become either marginal losses of around 2 - 3 or gains of around 1 - 2 in many of the sessions."""""

Don I was the one that posted that if I was betting the reverve I would have won big.
This was true ... but it would work on the sessions that I tested....if i would continue my testing in the next sessions the reverse would not be working....this is what ROULETTE is all about!!! Good fluxuations and bad fluxuations according to our system(any system)

It was supposed that You had an idea...the one of trapping more numbers with the system according to the LAW of THIRD!
Now IF you will reverse this idea....it shows and it leads to WHAT???
IT SHOWS AND IT LEADS TO THE OBVIOUS CONCLUSION THAT YOU don't EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING ALL THIS TIME!!!!!

In the beginning all the people in here had trust on you...they thought you were a person with education and experience in the field of Maths as you were claiming to be.

But From your actions it is obvious that you are not the one that you claim that you are.

Those actions are:

1)You say that playing continious spins or playing with sessions has a DEFERENCE !
   No person with a standard math education could ever say something like that!

2)You have an idea of how to trap the law of the third and when you see that its losing badly then you think to reverse this idea!!!!
  This is showing that you don't have an idea of what to do anymore.


So everything showes that you are not someone special ,You are just a person that descovered that Roulette exists and you did your efforts to beat it...like everyone else.
You had an idea ...you put it to the test and you saw that its losing...then you started the one tweak after the other....then you thought to reverse everything because if you have a consistent loser then by reverse it you may have a consistent winner.
Those thoughts and this path is what EVERY roulette explorer have walk into in his early years of exploring roulette...

I will not bother again with the Dna because from the time that I read your post abour reversing the idea it showed clearly that u do not know what you are doing....

Good Luck.

[superman]

then you thought to reverse everything because if you have a consistent loser then by reverse it you may have a consistent winner.
Those thoughts and this path is what EVERY roulette explorer have walk into in his early years of exploring roulette

Yup been there and done that too, I coded this system when it came out many many months ago, changed it when it was changed about 4 times then gave up, most changes are knee jerk reactions to how it lost, and now I read the above quote which tells me its still losing, time to move on, you cant keep flogging a dead horse, your wasting your own time, look elsewhere.

[RouletteExplorer]

exactly superman

[marivo]

Link to the software doesnt work!

[RouletteExplorer]

maybe Don got embarassed.
ANd he should be!!!!!

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update from Don

--------------------

Dear Philip,    I am making very good progress with live playing at my end with the new improvements. Now the winning streaks are identified as TRENDs. The players must play cautiously under the normal mode and the moment a trend is emerged, they can aggressively wager.    However, the Acid Test and the Risk Mitigation guidelines stipulated in the Page 14 of the E-Book must be strictly followed. Yesterday and today, I made a surpluse of 30 chips while reading the newspapers in front of the computer.   Dulan and I are now in the process of developing another startegy using the GRADIANTs. I will keep you updated from time to time. Meanwhile, I humbly request the Forum members those who still beleive in my work to provide me with a feedback on the new strategy. You are one such person.    Best Regards   Don

--------------------

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update from Don

--------------------------------------------------

Dear Philip,    You contacted me on "the day". Dulan and I were hard at work for the past two evenings and we are uploading the GRADIENT STRATEGY tonight. It was a nerve wrecking exercise to design the logic of that program using LATERAL THINKING, in order to track the absolute origination of the winning trends. In the process, we understood all the shortcomings associated with the currently available Grand Strategy. The Gradient Strategy is a remarkable improvement and a dramatic optimization of returns. You are the only person who understood our initiative but we are thankful to the others who posted CRITICAL REMARKS in the discussion forum, for having tested our ideas. I am sure that they will change their perception of our work from tomorrow, from a negative perception to a positive perception. I am very greatful to them as they made us think in different directions.    Once we upload the GRADIENT STRATEGY  tonight, we request all such critical evaluators of our work to do the same for one more time, once and for all.    Please post this comment to the forum.    Best Regards   Don

------------------

Thanks

malcop

[Chrisbis]

Something to look forward to then on this most interesting Project.

All the best to those concerned. 

[GLC]

Don,  All the hard work you and Dulan have put into this is much appreciated.  For those of us who have spent large blocks of time developing and testing strategies, we understand the commitment it takes.  Then to so freely share your results, accept criticisms graciously and continue to on with the project with a generous spirit is evidence, in my humble opinion, of a laudable human being.

Best to you,

George

P.S.  I hope your latest and greatest is exactly what we're looking for!

[malcop]

Don,  All the hard work you and Dulan have put into this is much appreciated.  For those of us who have spent large blocks of time developing and testing strategies, we understand the commitment it takes.  Then to so freely share your results, accept criticisms graciously and continue to on with the project with a generous spirit is evidence, in my humble opinion, of a laudable human being.

Best to you,

George

P.S.  I hope your latest and greatest is exactly what we're looking for!

Hi GLC,

That is exactly why I continue to post for Don, sure it dose not always work out as hoped, but so what it dose not mean you have to give up.

Don is one of those rare people with a vision and despite critics on this forum he continues non the less.

Keep up the good work Don & Dulan 

Thanks

malcop