DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

[Blood Angel]

You can get it and the data files from here: link:://:.neworiginalthinking.com/dna-of-roulette.html

Thanks i have done that now 

[malcop]

Hi All,

I finally got around to learning the "DNA of Roulette" system, so far my test have been similar to the data sheets Don has provided.

I have emailed Don for clarification on two matters the Critical Spin (CS) rule and the Zero exit rule.

Apart from those two questions everything else is pretty straight forward, I stopped recording the Entry Conditions, near the end of the session because it is only really needed if you intend to play another session straight after your current session as long as it ends positive.

Like anything else n life this is one of those things that seemed really difficult but as you progress and use it more it becomes pretty straight forward, and I agree with the author your speed would get faster the more you play.

As a finale note this system looks more difficult in the manual than it really is.

I will play some low stake sessions today and post them here.

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Hear is a session played for real money, I ended the session at +6, I exited the session and did not place the next set of bets because I interpreted the CS rule that I should not make the bet.

Hope you are all finding this useful.

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Another session for you ended +10

[flukey luke]

Hello Malcop.
It is good of you to post your results up. Early days, but they look encouraging.
I agree with what you were saying about the complexity of a system. Anything slightly different sometimes takes a while to get your head around it, but once you fully understand something and after a bit of testing, it can become almost second nature.
Good luck with any further testing. 

[esoito]

@Malcop
Superb work you're doing. Good man

Look, I hate to ask this of you, but I know it's desperately needed if folk are going to be able to use DNA properly:

When you have a moment could you kindly post a simplified, step-by-step explanation of how to use it? A simplified version that all can follow? 

That would be a wonderful gesture and ensure Don's work won't go to waste in its current, hard-to-follow-for-most-people form.

Much depends on your time and energy, of course, so we'll understand if you're not able to do this.

Hope you don't mind me asking, though.

[malcop]

Hi esoito,

I will try and put something together this weekend but it would probably be quicker if people just asked questions in this thread.

I'm still waiting for the author to get back to me with a couple of questions I.

Thanks

malcop

[A3on]

Hi esoito,

I will try and put something together this weekend but it would probably be quicker if people just asked questions in this thread.

I'm still waiting for the author to get back to me with a couple of questions I.

Thanks

malcop

A step by step would be really helpful
Thanks Malcop

[malcop]

A step by step would be really helpful
Thanks Malcop

I will try but remember I'm still learning the system 

[A3on]

Still, wonderful work on your test sessions ^^

[esoito]

Hi esoito,

I will try and put something together this weekend but it would probably be quicker if people just asked questions in this thread.

That's great!  VERY kind of you. Both I, and others I'm sure, will be very grateful indeed for your explanatory steps.

Thank you so much for considering the request.



I'm still waiting for the author to get back to me with a couple of questions I.

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

The Author got back to me about the CS rule, and after a few emails back and forth it tourned out that the rule could be simply explained like this.

"If you are one bet away from the target of +9 and you lose that bet exit the session"

It's funny I have been using this rule for a long time with any target based system because I found a lot of the time what would have ended in a positive session turned negative trying to chase those few more points hitting your target!

But the way the author worded it made it seem more complicated than it really was, this is what I have been saying about the whole system.

Also the author suggests that if the zero turns up while you are tracking/playing the system abandon the table, because based on the law of the third the zero will turn up within the next 37 spins.

Thanks

malcop

[Bayes]

But the way the author worded it made it seem more complicated than it really was, this is what I have been saying about the whole system.

Agreed. I get the feeling that Don is trying to make a name for himself in the academic community - so it helps to make things as complicated and incomprehensible as possible, that way the boffins are bound to be impressed. 

[malcop]

Hi All,

Here you will find two more sessions:

Session 001 is just straight forward and ended +3, Session 002 is made up of 10 back to back sessions a total of 108 spins, I still used the same exit points, and entry points if needed.

Out of the 10 back to back sessions I had two losses, the total win for session 002 was +40 units.

I played back to back because I wanted to get a really good feel on how the session holds up, I think so far my results are very similar to what Don has provided for us in his data sheets.

When you look at session 001/002 notice the shaded the spin no. in red this is to identify a Critical Spin, and if you look across from the shaded no. you will see the Dozen/Column bet shaded in either green or red depending on if the critical spin (last bet) for each session won or lost.

When you are deciding if the bet you are about to make is a critical bet bear this in mind

Each winning set of bets if both win will always produce the following results: +2, +5 or +8 (if both bets win)

So if you only needed to get 2 more units to hit your +9 target any of the above bets would take you to or over your +9 target, but no matter what you would exit the session.

But if you were at +4 only bets that would produce +5 or +8 would take you to or over your +9 target, but if the bets you was abut to make could only produce +2 units then you would only be at +7 so this could not be classed as a critical spin.

Anyway have a look through the sessions if you have any questions please ask.

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Attached to this post you will find my last three DNA sessions, so far today I have played 7 real money sessions they ended: +7, +6, +6, +10, +1, +5, +6 = +41 units.

Don the author has been extremely helpful in answering all my questions so now I'm fairly confident that I'm playing the system as the author intended.

The only area I had any doubt over was using the Entry Value (EV) correctly, and many mails back and forth with the author I have that under my belt, the author has also updated the manual and updated it to his website with the clarification on how to use the Entry Value (EV) condition to commence real money betting in the session.

So far I have helped one member to get to the same level of understanding as myself through Skype, if anyone else would like the same help then just contact me on malcop1960.

One final thing I have modified the scorecard and it will work out your EV calculation for you, just to save you having to keep counting back 5 spins to find the EV figure.

The spreadsheet is protected and the password is password

Any questions please ask.

Thanks

malcop