DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

[malcop]

Hi All,

Update from Don.

-------------------------------------


Dear Philip,

Based on regorous testing on our data samples, Dulan and I made certain improvements in the presently uploaded RCLV software. Could you please inform Mr. Sekuritati to test the same 50 data samples again and post the final bottom line figure and the number of games in which the system failed. The current failure rate on his 50 data samples is quite unacceptable despite the fact that he makes profit and that is why we need to test it with his data. Please oblige.

Best Regards

Don

---------------------

Thanks

malcop

[malcop]

Hi All,

Update from Don.

--------------------------------


Dear Philip,

The cause of low returns and higher rate of failure appears to be the exit after two consecutive -4, -4 spin losses. I cannot test this without Dulan amending the program. He is not available today and tomorrow evening we can test the system for the validity of this condition and do the necessary amendments. Meanwhile, please keep the forum informed of this unnecessary condition. Also, ask Mr. Sekuritati to hold on testing his 50 data samples again until Sunday.

I think we can now come close to a session optimization. Also, we will experiment something else as well we have in mind to see whether it makes a difference.

Best Regards

Don

---------------------------

Thanks

malcop

[albalaha]

Dear Mr. Don,
        You can inform us directly also of improvements. Anyways, it is good that you are working so hard upon it. Philip, can you please ask Mr. Colonne to join himself in the forum?

[malcop]

Dear Mr. Don,
        You can inform us directly also of improvements. Anyways, it is good that you are working so hard upon it. Philip, can you please ask Mr. Colonne to join himself in the forum?

Albalaha,

Don has been asked many times to join the forum and for his own reasons has chosen not to, if this is the way he wants to do things then so be it.

If you look at his website you can see he is a very busy man doing lectures all over his country.

Thanks

malcop

[albalaha]

Dear Philip,
I can understand that he is a busy fellow but if he can spare time to write u daily, he can write here as well. Anyways, his choice.

[malcop]

Hi All,

Latest update from Don.

-----------------------------

Dear Philip,

Dulan and I worked until 4.00 am on Sunday and ultimately found a strategy with high returns and low failure rate, which defenitely appears to be a long term winner. We have uploaded it now and the feedback from the users would be of immense use to us. Also, I want Mr. Sekuritati to now test the 50 data sets and provide me with a feedback.

Please request the players to exit only if a loss of capital of 10 or more (NCG value falling below  -10) is incurred and disregard all other exit points shown in the last column. Also, the user has to make a discretionary exit upon getting 10 or more chips. Some sessions reached gains over 50 as well with our test data.

This appears to be the best out of everything. Please ask users to post respective comments and their losses / gains if possible.

Don

-----------------------

Thanks

Malcop

[sekuritati]

Just to be sure, we are talking about RCLV, not DNAR, yes?

I am going to test the 50 sets with RCLV and provide results later.

Rules
- exit if NCG is falling beyond -10 units, a.k.a stop loss is 10 units from highest session balance point
- exit when profit exceeds 10 units

[malcop]

Just to be sure, we are talking about RCLV, not DNAR, yes?

I am going to test the 50 sets with RCLV and provide results later.

Rules

Hi sekuritati,

I just re-read Don's email and I agree with your interpretation for what Don has requested.

Thanks

malcop

[albalaha]

Well,
      It is a good news that this tool has been finally launched now. Does the system(e-book) has also been edited?

[malcop]

Well,
      It is a good news that this tool has been finally launched now. Does the system(e-book) has also been edited?

I'm not sure if the ebook has been edited yet, but do understand Don has asked for further testing against the 50 sessions that was posted, this is still a work in progress!

[albalaha]

I can understand that, waiting for Joro (sekuritati) to provide latest report.

[sekuritati]

Session   1   -10   
Session   2   10   
Session   3   10   
Session   4   -8   
Session   5   -4   
Session   6   9   
Session   7   -11   
Session   8   -6   
Session   9   -9   
Session   10   -9   
Session   11   0   
Session   12   10   
Session   13   -10   
Session   14   -12   
Session   15   11   
Session   16   -9   
Session   17   10   
Session   18   3   
Session   19   8   
Session   20   -10   
Session   21   -9   
Session   22   -10   
Session   23   -11   
Session   24   -9   
Session   25   -9   
Session   26   -12   
Session   27   15   
Session   28   -9   
Session   29   13   
Session   30   12   
Session   31   10   
Session   32   31   kept betting until first loss
Session   33   5   
Session   34   -11   
Session   35   3   
Session   36   -12   
Session   37   2   
Session   38   9   
Session   39   -3   
Session   40   8   
Session   41   0   
Session   42   -12   
Session   43   11   
Session   44   3   
Session   45   -9   
Session   46   0   
Session   47   -2   
Session   48   -11   
Session   49   -2   
Session   50   -10   
----------------------------
End profit: -46

[albalaha]

Minus 46 after playing 50 sessions. Too bad.

[malcop]

Hi All,

Update emails from Don.

-----------------------------

Dear Philip,

The system can be further improved with two other entry points that we have already identified and we can make dramatic improvements. This topological approach appears to be the right direction as we see very good results with it. The only problem is that Dulan is not well and we may not be able to do the modifications until the weekend. Please be patient and we will have the newest version uploaded in the weekend.

Best Regards

Don

--------------------------------------

Dear Philip,

I have a problem with test results that the new RCLV system is designed in a manner that a loss is always between -10 & -13 and a gain is always between +10 and +13. Mr. Sekuritati's observations have losses and gains outside this limit. The system is not fully developed yet and Dulan and I will be finalizing it on this forthcoming Saturday. Thus, I now realize that I have been unfair by Mr. Sekuritati by having a half baked program uploaded to make observations for data testing and posting it to be tested (even without the manual). The reason being, my oldest 30 data sets now yield over +150 with the new system with a failure rate of 8/30.

For the time being until the weekend, I expect the users to make observations of the formation of the three waves and monitor the NCG and exit immediately upon getting a surplus of over +10.

Please upload this comment.

Best Regards

Don

--------------------------------

Thanks

malcop

[sekuritati]

The reason for having results outside the specified limits is that I applied common sense in the testing.

For example a session starts and performs mostly in the negative then it gets with great amount of trouble to +7 for example, I exited immediatelly. Also some sessions were at +7 then a complete +8 win on the 4 bets came and it resulted in a +15. The session which is at +31 showed only wins in the whole session thats why I pushed it until first loss.

Also, 99% of negative sessions were exited after reaching around -10 from the session highest point - if i got to +5 then I lost to -4, exit. Thats why all the sessions are not at -10 or -13 because I applied this rule for the session highest point. Surely you would agree that it is better to win +4 then lose 10 units and exit at -6 - not a complete loss of session bankroll.

I will wait for a confirmation for the updated program and test the 50 data sets again. I will also attach in the post of my next testing an Excel spreadsheet with my 50 spin data sets with 50 sub-sheets. That way you can confirm on the results for yourself.