Blacks

[warrior]

Close to 95oo spins test live thse are the results   
spins
480 -5 losses
300 -1
200- 5
200 --0
300 -5
400 -2
481 --12 the worst one out of 9500
480 -1
422- 6
407 -5
368- 7

456 -6
485 -9
422 -7
417 -6
465 -6
337-- 2
503- 5
448 -8 this was 3 in a row the only one I will explaine later on this.
461 -5
535 -5
510- 2
512- 7
223- 2 thes are vthe results
    now where the bet lost 3 in a row means when the trigger came I lost my bet a total of 9 in a row  not bad for 9500 spins.

now the bet very simple trigger= BB now bet for 3 spins on black it will usally shows up within 3 spins  if any time you hit stop ,and wait for another, double BB
the losses in the results ex. 512 the losses were 7 means not in a row in total  when the trigger came I would lose to 3 reds  I hope that's clear  .

ex b
      r
      r
      b
      b =trigger bet black
      r
      b wins
      b = t.
      b wins
      b do not bet until it breaks the seq.
      r
      b
      b now betok that's it,  progression 1-2-3 or 124 stop then try to recover. I will stop at +10 and never go below +3 if I hit a bad run then when I'm +3 I stop.    all the best WARRIOR   

[Twisteruk]

Thanx for Sharing WARRIOR 

I see your losses.

What were your Wins ? And Profit on Turnover ?


Cheers Bud

[warrior]

Thanks for Sharing WARRIOR 

I see your losses.

What were your Wins ? And Profit on Turnover ?


Cheers Bud '

EX . 442 SPINS 41 TRIGGER' I WOULD LOSE 15 points wins  26 units profit the only 2 bad ones were the 12 losses and the 9 in a row session but the wins outweigh the losses but i will try this for real money and put it to a live test and i will let you know what my real wins and losses are ok warrior.

[Twisteruk]

How many wins did you have in 9500 Spins ?

Do you prefer 1-2-4 ?


Ok, look forward to your next post ! 

[ataru]

Warrior,

here's the rx script you asked for. 

I made it based on the rules you gave me:
It's very simple, the first trigger we never play,
I go in in on the second trigger,
the trigger  is RBB
then I play for a black for 3 spins but I want the first to lose
RBB RRR that's A LOSS
on the 2nd trigger of RBB THEN I PLAY FOR 3
if I lose I wait for the next
it only went once to the third level
I use a marty for the total of six spins

graph is from esoisto's 6000 dublin bet spins

[warrior]

I went back to playing this the other night did very well still holds up,im surprized no one has tried this.

[soggett]

Did you try it betting on red too?
Ar any other EC?

[warrior]

yes it works the same.

[crownroyal]

I like this idea. I've been flat betting against the last color to hit until RR or BB hits. Then bet that color with a 1,2,3, progression. Works good so far.

[warrior]

I like this idea. I've been flat betting against the last color to hit until RR or BB hits. Then bet that color with a 1,2,3, progression. Works good so far.

thats intersting i guess you can pass the time with flat betting.

[Maan]

This will almost never exceed 4 spins to hit the Target. So you may use a 1 1 2 4 progression.

You can even catch a R/B Run by consider ie, RR-R as another -RRsequence .

/M

[warrior]

This will almost never exceed 4 spins to hit the Target. So you may use a 1 1 2 4 progression.

You can even catch a R/B Run by consider ie, RR-R as another -RRsequence .

/M

YES IN 16000 SPINS only once it lost to the third level.

[GLC]

YES IN 16000 SPINS only once it lost to the third level.

Warrior,  I don't understand what you mean "lost to the third level."


Are you referring to the session where it lost 1-2-3, then next trigger and it lost again 1-2-3, then next trigger and it lost again 1-2-3, then next trigger and it won within 3 bets?  I notice that you have -8, but to lose three 3's in a row would be 9.  Was that a typo or am I missing something.


If that's the case, can't we use a more aggressive bet progression like 1-3-7 and just continue to bet this way win or lose?


Have you tested it with more than 3 steps, like 4 or 5 or 6 step marty?


GLC

[warrior]

Warrior,  I don't understand what you mean "lost to the third level."


Are you referring to the session where it lost 1-2-3, then next trigger and it lost again 1-2-3, then next trigger and it lost again 1-2-3, then next trigger and it won within 3 bets?  I notice that you have -8, but to lose three 3's in a row would be 9.  Was that a typo or am I missing something.i think that was a typo ,but like i said on 512 spin 7 does not mean in a row, when the trigger came i lost to 3 reds 7 times with in those spins ,that's why i like to wait for the bet selection to lose the first one the go go in on the second and third level total of 6 ,so i do not meet the table limits.


If that's the case, can't we use a more aggressive bet progression like 1-3-7 and just continue to bet this way win or lose?


Have you tested it with more than 3 steps, like 4 or 5 or 6 step marty?


GLC

GLC yes the first trigger we never play EX. RB RRR this is a loss we wait for this to happen ,the second trigger RBB RRB wins third spin ,it only went past the third once, ex.RRB RRR 1ST TRIGGER RBB RRR LOST 3 RBB RRR LOST 6 TOTAL OF 9 IF you were to play all the triggers ,i have played this table to table in a casino we have 5 where i go, i just look for this,on the ex i gave in my first post 512 spins 7 losses  does not mean in a row means the trigger came and i lost to 3 reds  it hapen 7 times, that's why i like to wait for the first loss then bet the next 2 levels ,6 spins after the triggers so i don't reach the table limits ,hope this helps WARRIOR

[GLC]

Warrior,  Can you explain your progression?  I assume you use one since you mentioned staying below the table limits.