Missing Sector

[ignatus]

OK, moving on..... this should perhaps be in the "testing zone", but i publish this for everyone to try. Reason why i found this out, I have a statistical program STATA, I loaded some livespins, then divided the wheel into three parts and did three new variables according to those numbers it represented. Now, I could study the *patterns* if there was any? And, yes, I found a clear pattern... that this strategy is based on;


Missing Sector:

These numbers are the wheel divided into three equal parts. (see picture)



A: 2,4,6,13,15,17,19,21,25,27,32,34


B: 1,5,8,10,11,16,20,23,24,30,33,36


c: 0,3,7,9,12,14,18,22,26,28,29,31,35


What i found: -When two parts of the wheel hit, most of the time, or atleast very frequently the third, *missing sector* will hit. This event is very common according to my statistics. So...


How to play this? Wait for two different sectors to hit, and then bet for the third.


I was thinking flatbetting: Bet two times then STOP. Some losses must be accepted.


But in the long run, if this pattern is real, profits should add up.


I need help testing this one.


Thank you.

[speed]

Statistics say that the ball will land on the C sector more times than on the other two sectors (A,B) )))

[ignatus]

Statistics say that the ball will land on the C sector more times than on the other two sectors (A,B) )))

Very funny? No. I'm playing this now .. LWWLWLWWLLLW +69u flatbetting. Is this just a coincidence or just "luck"? I don't think so?

[ignatus]

LWWLWLWWLLLWWW 106u Flatbetting, so far...

[agesta]

LWWWWWWLLLLLLLLWLLLL
+8 units
I will try with virtuel win after 2 losses
Agesta

[agesta]

Hi!
No i have tried this with after 2 losses wait for a virtuel win.
WLWWWLL(vl,vl,vl,vl,vl,vl,vw),LL,(vl,vl,vl,vw)LL(vl,vw)LL(vl,vw),LWWWLWLWWW
+114 units
agesta

[Turner]

Hi!
No i have tried this with after 2 losses wait for a virtuel win.
WLWWWLL(vl,vl,vl,vl,vl,vl,vw),LL,(vl,vl,vl,vw)LL(vl,vw)LL(vl,vw),LWWWLWLWWW
+114 units
agesta

Without wishing to insult anyones intellegence, of couse, these follow dozens patterns and all their horrors. It will sleep for 24 spins no different.

[agesta]

LWLL(vl,vl,vl,vw)WWWLL(vl,vl,vw),WLL(vl,vw)W +60 units
instead of+36
Turner its just fun testing different ways and Watch
what can happen when you Changes things.
nothing else.
agesta

[Skakus]

Without wishing to insult anyones intellegence, of couse, these follow dozens patterns and all their horrors. It will sleep for 24 spins no different.

At least someone around here has their brain switched to the ON position.

[ignatus]

At least someone around here has their brain switched to the ON position.

I didn't say no losses would happen. I said it was a pattern i found, studying some live spins in my statistical software. Now, Skakus and Turner. Sure it's good to be critical, but I only wished to *find out* if this pattern was real?.... and I said I needed help to find it out.


You can see for yourself (this pattern), from my statistics. it's saved in an .rtf file (viewed in wordpad)...anyway


Sectors are called here x y z.

[Ralph]

Statistics says all numbers will land about equal times in billions of spins, we use to get the same answers, answers published more than 100 years ago.


The point is if we hit in our spins, knowing the odds we get, making it almost impossible.
Write 99.999999% pay back is the same as write "We take your money soon or later".


I had a very bad numbers of runs, wich put me back 100000 fun. The only chance to recover, if I want to, is risking more.
Max bet on number five flat bet it for 376 spins  went at last plus. If we have the variance on our side, let it be big.
1/3 bet should never recover 100000 units.

[ignatus]

Ok, thanks Ralph... "Statistics says all numbers will land about equal times in billions of spins" This statement says nothing against my findings, now two sectors hit. The third sector *will* in most cases hit within the next 3 spins... so? I didn't say it always will, but frequently enough, obviosly that we can take an advantage of this pattern, and make some profits ? I'd like if someone could run this in RouletteXtreme , and try larger number of live-spins to see if this can last...


I've been thinking now again how to play this. Now, I think 3 spins with a 1,2,3 progression then STOP. If a new sector hit during this bet, that new *missing sector* is bet. (Flatbetting seems to be hard?) I don't know. ideas how to play this the best way are welcome. But I will try this now.... 1,2,3 progression... and STOP. Losses must be accepted, yes, but again, if the pattern is real, we will see? Ok

[ignatus]

Hi!
No i have tried this with after 2 losses wait for a virtuel win.
WLWWWLL(vl,vl,vl,vl,vl,vl,vw),LL,(vl,vl,vl,vw)LL(vl,vw)LL(vl,vw),LWWWLWLWWW
+114 units
agesta

Great, thanks.

[Ralph]

Red and black fall equal times on NOZ, but that does not mean it will be every second spin. You can miss a sector 70 times in a row, it is like dozen bet.  Progressions and dozen is not at all the safest way you can play, and on  fair wheel the sectors it is about as bet on doz.
I think it has been attempts using three sectors million times before you start trying it.



I think smaller sectors will make it better, like three to five numbers. It is like bet on the track.


The variance is not to keep low on a wheel which not give the player odds over fair (You probably never find such a wheel).


The chance of hitting 12 straight up on NOZ is 1/3. What do you think is the odds of hitting one number i 12 spins?
Yes it is slight less, but you have the chance to win on more than one chip. The first lose allways minimum 11 chips.

[ignatus]

Ok Ralph...


I played this live now at "Lucky Live Casino";



LLWLWWWLLLLWLLWLLLWWLLWWW +300u from this session, using progression for 12 numbers 1-1-2-3-4-6-9