Anyone in here tried Roulette Bandit sequencing technique??

[albalaha]

All RNG's are not bad and manipulated. Play with a reputed casino and proper technique you would win regularly even on RNGs. But RNG gives little more unpredictable results since it just picks a number and throws while in live wheel, a ball has to pass certain pockets before landing somewhere, this is the only difference between a genuine RNG and live wheel.

[ThomasGrant]

I think Thomas has won a substantial amount with RNG using one of his roulette bots . Correct me if I'm wrong Thomas.

Correct.
I have won money with MMM.
Roulette Bot Pro.
and
Super Roulette.

[Twisteruk]

Thomas, what one is MMM ?


Cheers bud 

[Bayes]

Welcome, Chrisbis.

Mate, STAY AWAY FROM RNG.

It's software. Specially written software to ensure you lose. Not just me saying that, by the way.

I disagree. I've won consistently on RNG. This is a very old debate and will probably never go away, but all those who dismiss RNG as being designed to ensure you always lose never give any specific evidence that this is the case. The assumption is that because it's easier for them to cheat you (because you can't actually see the ball and wheel in front of you) then they MUST be doing it, even though there are compelling reasons (not to mention logistic issues) which indicate that it's rather unlikely they would do it, especially if they are a well known company (such as any of the 'big name' UK bookies).

Most of the so called "evidence" is anecdotal and is usually something like "I lost all my money playing RNG, so they must be cheating!" Well big surprise, many people often lose playing roulette!

I'm not saying that crooked OCs don't exist - they do. But I'd love to see some specific evidence that they cheat in the way most people are suggesting. Whenever I play at an online I keep a record of the spins and do a statistical analysis (a test for randomness). I have NEVER seen anything which makes me suspect that outcomes are being "fixed" to make me lose.

[superman]

I have NEVER seen anything which makes me suspect that outcomes are being "fixed" to make me lose

Me neither, before playing any new method I always run it through RXtreme, if it fails there it will fail on an RNG casino too, now, put your hand up if you think RXtreme cheats too, lol

[ThomasGrant]

Thomas, what one is MMM ?

Cheers bud 

Ohh, that was the first Casino tool I purchased.
Well, not 100% sure about that. I may have got Roulette Sniper before or after.
Anyway. It was called MMM or Money Maker Machine.
It was a very basic martingale progression.
Playing on Red or Black.
On RNG. Zero would kill ya.
Or at least knock your bank balance down a bit.
I think it is called RBS now. Or Red Black System.
It played on many playtech casinos.
It was the only tool at the time that did.
You needed a bank of $256 to play.
And with $1 that did not give you a lot of room to move.
1,
2,
4,
8,
16,
32,
64,
128,
256...

MMM improve a little over time.
But not a great deal.
I kept pestering the Admin for improvements.
There are now new tools from MMM.
RSS Pro. The software that I am using to build my bot.
Very easy to use.
Apparently Admin is looking for sponsors to help him fund his projects.
And one of those is RSS Pro for Live Casinos.
I mentioned that I might be able to assist.
But due to circumstances.
Like getting hospitalised.
It may take me some time to raise $100 or $150

So that is MMM.
Here is a link for it.
link:://:.money-maker-machine.com/forum/index.php?referredby=73
And here is a list of products he has.
link:://:.money-maker-machine.com/products.htm
I think I have a few of them.
But never use them.
Just don't like them any more.
Don't like the look.
Or how they work.
The only one that I have any interest in. Is RSS Pro.

[Fast Bucks]

I disagree. I've won consistently on RNG. This is a very old debate and will probably never go away, but all those who dismiss RNG as being designed to ensure you always lose never give any specific evidence that this is the case. The assumption is that because it's easier for them to cheat you (because you can't actually see the ball and wheel in front of you) then they MUST be doing it, even though there are compelling reasons (not to mention logistic issues) which indicate that it's rather unlikely they would do it, especially if they are a well known company (such as any of the 'big name' UK bookies).

Most of the so called "evidence" is anecdotal and is usually something like "I lost all my money playing RNG, so they must be cheating!" Well big surprise, many people often lose playing roulette!

I'm not saying that crooked OCs don't exist - they do. But I'd love to see some specific evidence that they cheat in the way most people are suggesting. Whenever I play at an online I keep a record of the spins and do a statistical analysis (a test for randomness). I have NEVER seen anything which makes me suspect that outcomes are being "fixed" to make me lose.

I agree 100%, i myself am an RNG player using programs that i wrote, and have won
on an overall basis. This would not be possible on a forced outcome device. 

[esoito]

Hmmm...interesting observations on RNG.

Why, then, do various commentators across the web note that when they run their system(s) on the 'play money' option they seem to lose less than when they play with real money?

Many here must have noticed that.

As a partial explanation, I recall reading an article/post some while ago (sorry -- can't recall where) written by a programmer. He said 'play money' and 'real money' used different algorithms!!

He expanded on the theme. And, without actually stating it outright, he made it pretty clear the 'real money' program was...well, 'tweaked', to put it kindly.

Hence my well-intended warning to our new member earlier on, and my advice to stick to 'live' play.

I still think that's correct and sensible advice for a newcomer, and I won't resile from taking that responsible position. (Actually, if I was really responsible, I'd tell him not to play roulette at all !!! But that's another story...)

Perhaps those who've posted above that they've found 'good' RNGs could let the forum know which specific ones.

@Bayes
You use special software to check number distributions etc. Very good.
Could let us know where to find it, or even make it available to the forum?

[ricos777]

I heard of it and it sounds interesting. Would love some feedback from actual users

[chrisbis]

Roulette Bandit sequence is available here in download section..
Its quite hard to play with as there's a lot of time waiting for the next sequence to arrive.

...

By the way chaps, i have just bought my second Bot.

...Roulette Bot Pro V.3..................USD$45

On sale now via email sent to me.

PM me if anyone else wants details (im not the seller!!.. nor an affilliate!!)
Hope this does break to code on selling VLS


I will evaluate the Bot, like Tom (Thomas Grant) is doing and feed back to members here the results.
Its going to be a busy time now!! Must win my money back first-off!!

[albalaha]

I don't believe in bots but I will surely believe your testimonials chris. Had it been so easy to defeat roulette with a bot of $45 only, everybody will become winner. I have used roulettesniper, roulettekiller and RBet, all are failures and cheats. Will await you winning story. It would be great if you could have some screenshots of your changing(increasing) bankrolls or even better if you could make a video of your game.All the best Chris

[chrisbis]

Cheers AL.

Might need some suggestions of what good software to use to capture my play.

One thing i would say bout the new Bot (V.3)  (and i didn't have prev versions by-the-way),
is the range of difference systems and options u can choose.

I have been testing it for bout a week now- some real play- real money, and some JUST FOR FUN and like all systems, it wins and losses.

The losses mainly do to that good old fashioned need for greed on my part- setting the stop loss to low, or even switching it off altogether just to watch it play right down to the wire!!

Its main attributes seem to be- SLEEPERS, SUPER SLEEPERS and  REVERSE SLEEPERS.
Its also got a complex maths system, but that will be much later in the day.

The range of selectable options is very inpressive.
More later chaps, i have togo to work now and build!!

Chris

[albalaha]

Camastasia studio is the best suited software for recording the video. If you need a pirated one for free, email me.

[Bayes]

@Bayes
You use special software to check number distributions etc. Very good.
Could let us know where to find it, or even make it available to the forum?

There is some here: link:://:.fourmilab.ch/random/

But unfortunately it won't accept numbers, only "bits" and "bytes". I've got around that by converting the spins to 0 and 1, so that the numbers represent a stream of EC outcomes (since that's what I play most of the time). This isn't very satisfactory, but there doesn't seem to be any software available which will analyse roulette spins as numbers (a set of equally 37 equally likely numbers). I've contacted the proprietor of random.org to ask him. If there isn't any such software available, it would be a nice project to write it myself.

[chrisbis]

Has someone recently put this Roulette Bandit Sequence into a Bot somewhere?

Have they?