Anyone in here tried Roulette Bandit sequencing technique??

[esoito]

Has someone recently put this Roulette Bandit Sequence into a Bot somewhere?

Have they? 


Yes. Roulette Assault.

[chrisbis]

Does it come with its own batteries Esoito....................................?



Making it............Roulette.......Assault & Battery            

[iggiv]

I tried Roulette Bandit tecnique and lost with it too. it was on playtech real mode RNG

[marivo]

Does it come with its own batteries Esoito....................................?



Making it............Roulette.......Assault & Battery            

Are you making a bot?

[superman]

Now theres a thought, battery .............. bot

are you making a bot

Don't they get made in botteries ??

[Ron]

I agree 100%, I myself am an RNG player using programs that I wrote, and have won
on an overall basis. This would not be possible on a forced outcome device. 

I myself too. cheers

[albalaha]

Roulette bandit is a complete failure. Indeed any type of EC playing with Martingale is bound to fail.

[chrisbis]

Have U studied Roulette Bandits unique EC sequencing technique then Sumi?

Just wondered?

[albalaha]

Yes offcourse.

[chrisbis]

And so, what would U say was the main thrust of the whole
System*, then Given Its unique formate?                                  (*Roulette Bandit)

Is it Tracking?

Is it Triggers?

or

Is it Martingale Progression?

And...... How would U sum up is a nutshell, for Newbie's like myself,
and for the vast array of Guests dropping in this fine early Sunday morning,
why Roulette Bandit, is NOT the EC system for U?

(Newbie in this context, is someone who bows their
head to Ur considerable experience in playing the game of Roulette)

[Bayes]

I wrote a simulation to test the system about a year ago (it was a loser). It's based on the so called "law of series" which says that in an even chance, there will half as many series of 2 as singles, half as many series of 3 as series of 2, half as many series of 4 as series of 3, etc.

It's basically a sleeper type system; you track the individual series (singles, series of 2, series of 3...) until a particular series is "behind" relative to its expectation, then start betting that it will show. It's fairly complex and the tracking is a nightmare - it's just not worth the effort.

The recommended progression is a 5 step martingale.

[superman]

It's basically a sleeper type system; you track the individual series (singles, series of 2, series of 3...) until a particular series is "behind" relative to its expectation, then start betting that it will show. It's fairly complex and the tracking is a nightmare - it's just not worth the effort

Yes I put this into a bot atleast a year ago, still have the bot, it counts series works out whats behind then makes a decision, it fails eventually, reason I think is because you can never accuratly predict over what period of spins the series belong to, probably not a clear description but you should get the point. If I remember correctly, it can be as wild as single number sleepers, you could be tracking for a long long time before you think series of 4 are behind only to get hit by a chop sequence.

I did the same test on ALL ec's and not one of them was any better than the other, it still ended in high progression and eventual failure.

[albalaha]

Dear Chris,
          I think Bayes and Superman have answered it very well. I do not consider you to be a newbie and myself an expert. It is a game of negative expectation and Martingale goes just opposite it hence lose sooner or later. Neither Martingale nor flat betting can overcome the odds of this game. Triggers, proper bet selection and sensible progression alongwith stop loss point and loss recovery can overcome this evil. All of us are trying in our own ways to fight the odds of this toughest form of gambling. I am not perfect but seeking perfection.

[Bayes]

The seller says he will give a refund provided you show a sequence where the system fails. I wasn't worried about that since I didn't pay for it, and I don't know whether he honours the guarantee, but I imagine most hopeful punters will either make mistakes in the tracking (if they even understand how to play it in the first place) or not bother at all - so I don't imagine he gets many refund requests. 

Several people have asked about this system. Perhaps we could have a section so people can contribute their experiences with commercial systems, something like "Known Scams".

Let's keep the scammers hungry!

[marivo]

Have you tried version, which is embedded in the roulette assault?