First it Giveth....

[ignatus]

1) Bet each straight up number that comes until one hit then STOP.

2) That single number hit is removed and +1 on all other numbers.(positive progression) continue doing this: Remove each number hit, and +1 on all other numbers until reaching a new high, then stop(restart)

* IF hit before 8 numbers bet reset/restart.

* Greed is your only enemy, you should really stop(restart) when reaching a new high.

[TwoCatSam]

ignatus

From time to time people send me systems.  They either want me to buy a sheet for the ExcelBot and test it OR they want me to spend hours on end testing it by hand.  Then they want me to report back to them if they have a winning system.

They are too lazy to do the work themselves so they hype the thing up by saying "Promise you won't tell a living soul about this.".  So they want Ol' TwoCat to work his arse off and report if they can make money.

I'm beginning to think you fall into this genre.  Methinks you post these things hoping someone will play them and report back that it's a winner.

A long time ago, you posted a pretty darn good system.  Had you stuck with it, you might be where you want to be.  But you keep running dirty underwear up the flagpole hoping someone will salute it.

Play the dang system Atlantis posted on one of your threads.  My way or the highway, I think.  It is truly a winning idea.

Or not.  Keep on keeping on.  You'll notice that you rarely even get comments anymore.  You're much like the little boy who cried "wolf". 

Sorry for the bluntness, but it's time to give it a rest.

Anyone agree?

Sam

[Ralph]

This one is not bad, but should you remove the hitting number? Saving possible sleepers?
With the proper tweak it can be something.

It is then possible to run it to win 9999 of 10000 times. Bankroll needed!
Handle  table limit is a must, as the bet can grow, quite a bit before catching up.

[ignatus]

ignatus

From time to time people send me systems.  They either want me to buy a sheet for the ExcelBot and test it OR they want me to spend hours on end testing it by hand.  Then they want me to report back to them if they have a winning system.

They are too lazy to do the work themselves so they hype the thing up by saying "Promise you won't tell a living soul about this.".  So they want Ol' TwoCat to work his arse off and report if they can make money.

I'm beginning to think you fall into this genre.  Methinks you post these things hoping someone will play them and report back that it's a winner.

A long time ago, you posted a pretty darn good system.  Had you stuck with it, you might be where you want to be.  But you keep running dirty underwear up the flagpole hoping someone will salute it.

Play the dang system Atlantis posted on one of your threads.  My way or the highway, I think.  It is truly a winning idea.

Or not.  Keep on keeping on.  You'll notice that you rarely even get comments anymore.  You're much like the little boy who cried "wolf". 

Sorry for the bluntness, but it's time to give it a rest.

Anyone agree?

Sam

Some strategies are not tested enough, true. This one i played on RNG 7-8 times i think and I never lost one session, so I think it's pretty solid. (if it works on RNG, it will work anywhere, because RNG is most difficult)...But true as Ralph say bankroll is needed.

[ignatus]

link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=g5GrSPUAj4E

[ignatus]

Here is one tweak: Play the same method, but with the streets.

* IF hit before 5 streets are placed reset/restart

[ignatus]

...Perhaps the best way is playing this is with SPLITS?? I will try this. Come back with results soon...

[ignatus]

Splits bet are 1/4, 2/5, 3/6, 7/10... and so on. (same strategy) Bet each new split that comes until one hit.... then STOP. That single split hit is removed and +1 on all others, continue remove each new split hit , and +1 bet on all others until bankroll reach a new high


I'm suprised myself of the results, better than expected.

No big losses, (as played with straight ups) Hitrate is good,..


(Live spins)

[TwoCatSam]

I tried this with pennies at BV.  I lost 1,000 in a matter of minutes.

This confirms something I've always believed:  Rx will give you a winning graph nearly--I say nearly--every time.  I often wonder if this was not a collaborative effort by on-line casinos to convince people their ideas worked.

ignatus, I see why you don't play your stuff.

Sam

[ignatus]

I tried this with pennies at BV.  I lost 1,000 in a matter of minutes.

This confirms something I've always believed:  Rx will give you a winning graph nearly--I say nearly--every time.  I often wonder if this was not a collaborative effort by on-line casinos to convince people their ideas worked.

ignatus, I see why you don't play your stuff.

Sam

Sorry to hear that. You played with straight ups?

I am seriously thinking of playing this for real next week, but with splits. Playing with splits is the final tweak of this method.

Playing with straight ups is a higher risk, yes...

---

I am searching for a strategy that I can play for real, that's why my many inventions and experiments with different systems...

I'll try listen to your complaints Sam, and test the systems more before I post them. This is a common mistake, yes. I don't know how many times that has happened,.... I have a good run, think i found something, then luck turns... well.. We'll see how long this will last.

I think i have a couple of systems now that works pretty good,.... but more testing is needed. And I'm happy for everyone helping testing and giving ideas of improvements/tweaks.

I've learned alot during my time on this forum, and I'm just happy to share my own discoveries (from my level of understanding, and from my own experience)


Cheers

[Blood Angel]

Play the dang system Atlantis posted on one of your threads.  My way or the highway, I think.  It is truly a winning idea.

Sam

hi Sam,
Do you recall which thread that was in? I cant find it.

[Chris555p]

Hi Ingnatus

In relation to your post above where u mentioned  ".......I am searching for a strategy that I can play for real,
that's why my many inventions and experiments with different systems......."; Why not study and play the most
simple strategy that a lot of experienced players use to make $.....Lol Lol??

Why not read the book of Brett Morton read various article posted by our friend GLC and our other friends on
the forum regarding playing EC.  This would certainly In My Humble Opinion save u a lot of time, energy and making some real $
at roulette while having fun......Why make simple things so complicated.......LoL ?? Just my two cents.

Cheers

Chris

[GLC]

hi Sam,
Do you recall which thread that was in? I can't find it.

Yes Sam.  No throwing hand grenades with the pin still in them.

(That one should cause some head scratching.  I'm not sure I know what it means.)  Although I'm assuming you mean the e.c. plus a line method.

By the way, to answer a previous question.  My truck showed 112 degrees a few days ago.  You'll have to decide if that's hot or not.

GLC

[ignatus]

I am sorry, this strategy failed pretty bad now playing it live. (the split version)

[TwoCatSam]

The thread is 1 EC + 1 line, but this the post by Atlantis:

Hi eddy,

I do similar idea but just started playing daily sessions of 5 games where I bet EC and doublestreet (Line) combo.  Total 24 numbers bet.

A result of +3 or more ends a game. And bear in mind this can occur in just 1 single spin.

On each loss I increase the EC bet by +1.  Only after a set of 2 consecutive losses is the LINE bet also increased by +1.

Bet Selection is easy peasy and one of my trusted favourites derived from my "Line Combo Bet" and "Atlantis Dozens":

If last number is RO or BE then bet HIGH and LINE 3 (13-18)
If last number is BO or RE then bet LOW and LINE 4 (19-24)

Live dealer or live autowheel only. Single 0.

Reveal (click to show/hide)

Best wishes,
Atlantis.

_________________________________________________________________________

ignatus

I bear no ill will.  I've lost on many of my ideas also.  That's why I bet pennies.

GLC

Bro, that's hot!!

All............

Here is probably the last screen shot I'll do of this.  If people aren't interested by now, they never will be.

Sam