How scared would you be if you found… the holy grail?

[Buffster]

@spin4fun

How about you show us the chart of the first 100 numbers and also show us the actual numbers. At least this way we can have a fighting chance of breaking your CODE ( of silence ).

Also, I'm not much of a math guy, but did you CARRY the 1 when you added all this up ?

Thanks

Buffster

[Turner]

Well I thought It was this one

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7482.0

It had 14595 views

Its just the graph and comment in this post is in that post..a simple deduction my dear watson

[D1]

Its just the graph and comment in this post is in that post..a simple deduction my dear watson

Hey Turner
you have to remember I can get lost even using a sat nav lol

[warrior]

Graph means nothing ,look at my illuminati system had a guy do 100000 spins played first time at casino well that's all I will say.

[Turner]

Graph means nothing ,look at my illuminati system had a guy do 100000 spins played first time at casino well that's all I will say.

warrior....I mean the graph Spin4fun shows in this thread is the graph in the post he was hinting about....hence...thats the post he tweaked.

[Chrisbis]

Anyone done any work on a suggested bet selection and a tweak?

[jarabo002]

Well I thought It was this one

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7482.0

It had 14595 views

Do not add units when you win. (+1)

[Chrisbis]

U mean stay at the same unit level on a Win?

Hmmmm...ok.....I will take that one!



Come on folks, what are our options.
How many lines bet.
Why we bet.
What are the triggers.
How do we 'move' the bet and when
How does the MM manifest itself
?

[Turner]

Anyone done any work on a suggested bet selection and a tweak?

I cant link ignatus average distance tracker to lines. what can you do with lines to stop them doing what they do in every single system.

If its a hoax or similar....it has made me think of an idea...so good has come of it.

[Chrisbis]

Surely Shirley they maybe a correlation between distance of a Line result to the next Line result, whether that be an average distance, and actual distance of a relative  distance.

Maybe we have to give the Resultant Line landing a values, and measure that value against the next landing?

[Colbster]

I struggle making the connection to lines as well.  But every time we have a directional move, it is actually 2 separate distances, CW and CCW.  We can't logically average those two, as it will always be 18, so we would have to make a choice between the two.  Then he suggests that we apply that distance to both directions though.  I was thinking that we could reduce the 36 down to 12 by taking the distance within a dozen (or column) and calculating distances each time we got a hit in that particular dozen.  The payouts would be solid if the method applied equally well to the dozens (which I don't see why it wouldn't).  Since we have a hit every time in one of the 3 dozens, if we have 2 numbers in each of the dozens, there should be a solid chance of hitting fairly big fairly often.  Just a thought.

[Chrisbis]

I like your thoughts Colbster.

[Turner]

If spin4funs done nothing else...hes got us talking as a collective...which is rare.

Im enjoying it a lot

[rouletteKEY]

...he's got us talking as a collective...

Oh no!  I will not be assimilated!   

Sorry Turner you said "collective" and I just thought of the Borg...although I don't know why as I haven't watched a Star Trek episode or movie for years...

[Colbster]

Reading through Spins thoughts on the original post (to see how his thinking evolved), he comments on the progression being what makes it.  Have I missed it in this thread, or has he declared if he is flatbetting or using a progression?