How scared would you be if you found… the holy grail?

[iggiv]

if this looks like leg pulling probably we will close this thread or even remove it. Maybe i will ask Steve what he thinks about this thread because i am not so sure how to treat it.
But if Spin4Fun gives some serious info on his winnings (or should i say "winnings"?) and this thread becomes real useful we will continue discussing here.

Once there used to be an unwritten rule "put up or shut up". Too many loud claims which ended up as nada.
Some even as a pure scam.

But whatever it is -- serious or joke or whatever else-- folks, it's not a reason to get abusive. Let's keep it cool and friendly.

thanks for understanding

[GLC]

I don't know how many times I've posted the following: 

As long as there are numbers that will cause you to lose if they spin, and there are always numbers that can hurt us no matter where we put our units on the table, eventually, with random results, these losing numbers will hit often enough, close enough together to not allow a graph like the one posted at the beginning of this topic.  At least not for 50,000 spins.

I don't think tracking, triggers, etc... can work well enough to counter the above reality. 

Maybe the right progression for the bet method can be devised that will survive the downturns for this system to allow us to stay within the table limits and our bankroll until a recovery.  (I have to include the last sentence to justify my life for the last few years) :LoL:

My suspicion is that there's an error in the code.  If not and the winning factor is the bet method, (it would have to be) we should be able to adapt the bet method to other systems to good advantage.  This is why I'm hoping Spin4fun will join back in the fray and give us a little more help.

What do you say Spin?

GLC

P.S.  The other possibility is "remote viewing".

[rouletteKEY]

Where is Ed Dames when you need him...would fit right into the negative expectation side of this whole equation (roulette in general not talking about "grails" with Major Dames)

[warrior]

if this looks like leg pulling probably we will close this thread or even remove it. Maybe i will ask Steve what he thinks about this thread because i am not so sure how to treat it.
But if Spin4Fun gives some serious info on his winnings (or should i say "winnings"?) and this thread becomes real useful we will continue discussing here.

Once there used to be an unwritten rule "put up or shut up". Too many loud claims which ended up as nada.
Some even as a pure scam.

But whatever it is -- serious or joke or whatever else-- folks, it's not a reason to get abusive. Let's keep it cool and friendly.

thanks for understanding

why don't you shut this down nothing to do with roulette.

[Andrey86Pak]

Why Spin always watching us, but does not participate in the discussion.

[TwoCatSam]

I agree with George. 

Random will begin to beat you no matter what you do.  Then you say, "Well, Mr. Random-Shandom, I'll just discontinue betting and come back later when you have your head on straight."

The words of Ronjo keep coming back to me: "Why stand there and take a beating?" 

Many times, when random is beating the Excelbot, I just shut 'er down for a few hours and re-start it.  It's almost like a whole new world.

enuf.....

TwoCat

P.S.  Don't kill the thread.  If nothing else, it's interesting!

[winner3]

It's probably just a coincidence, but 7 days ago i have sent my best roulette system "created by me" to Spin4Fun
to test if it was a winner in the long term thanks to its software, after an initial response where I was confirmed that in the first phase of testing was a winner, I no longer received a response from spin4fun, maybe it's just a coincidence or maybe not ..

but my system is designed to work on quad (4 numbers) but it is easily adaptable to lines, if you want I can expose the system on the forum to see if it is a winner in the long run.

Thanks 

[rouletteKEY]

the plot thickens...

[Chrisbis]

Please 'expose' Winner3..........we are all adults in here, and can take a little exposure now and again!

George & Sam, have you two taken those tablets we talked about!??!... 
Good.......then let the expose' begin
We await.......................................... 

[D1]

Please 'expose' Winner3..........we are all adults in here, and can take a little exposure now and again!

George & Sam, have you two taken those tablets we talked about!??!...  :LoL:
Good.......then let the expose' begin
We await.......................................... 

Hey Chris

speak for yourself

I might be 47 but Im not an adult lol

[winner3]

First of all I must warn you of my bad english.

This is the original system : it is not easy to explain if you have any questions do them.

010203
040506
---------
070809
101112
---------
131415
161718
---------
192021
222324
---------
252627
282930
---------
313233
343536

you have to wait that comes out the last line (6 numbers) and attack the
corresponding quad, in this example :

4
12
5
23
1
17
25
31 (the last line in this sequence) numbers : 31-32-33-34-35-36 you bet the
quad 32-33-35-36 for 9 spins
if you win retrack if you lose after 9 spins retrack with the same system but
bet 2 units on the new quad. if you lose a 9 spins cycle +1 if you win -1 if
you are positive resets everything and start again from 1.

33
21
5
10 (the last line in sequence) numbers : 07-08-09-10-11-12 you bet the quad 08-
09-11-12

let me know what you think, if you do not understand something please contact
me.

[ugly bob]

Easy enough to understand 

So you are leaving out the split which has awakened when the bet is triggered.

Let's say you get...

11

06

18

23

30

32

So would you play the 31/34 and 33/36 for the next 9 spins?

cheers

[winner3]

Hi, yes ugly bob you have understood perfectly, yes in this case you can bet on the split 31/34 and 33/36 or you can bet
on the correspondig Street for 12 spins (Street 34-35-36).
The system can be modified to focus on the line in your case you can bet the line 31/36 for 6 spins applying the same progression explained above.

Thanks

[RFMAXX]

but spin4 fun is referring to an old system with 10000 views...or he is trying to fool us...

thanks for sharing winner anyway 

[ugly bob]

Yes, thank you winner3.

It's generous of you to share your idea with us.