How scared would you be if you found… the holy grail?

[warrior]

OK, now I understand it and have a question:  How could this possibly work any better than just randomly picking two splits?

im not sure .

[Proofreaders2000]

You have to wait that comes out the last line (six
numbers) and attack the corresponding quad, in this example:

4
12
5
23
1
17
25
31 (the last line in this sequence)
------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm thinking you could bet the column split: (in this case it would be
31/34) for up to 18 spins and the other column split of the two when
it shows (with a drawdown of -36 units per one unit bet).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You could also bet the two column splits that did not hit on the
last line number.  Example: #31--Bet 33/36 and 32/35 for up to nine spins.

[ugly bob]

OK, now I understand it and have a question:  How could this possibly work any better than just randomly picking two splits?

It's a good question!

But like Turner suggests, perhaps this is where this regression to the mean stuff comes into it's own.

My personal preference would be not to give the splits 9 spins to appear. I would rather just give them 3 spins to either come out or not. I noticed loads of early wins and then you get times where you would lose 3 games back to back. This can get costly even on a +1 on a loss.

Roy Ward Dickson had a fairly similar approach. Although he bets for the same split to appear which triggered and gives it 3 spins. Of course this is the nemesis of the way winner3 is suggesting.

[winner3]

Thanks to all for the interest in my system 

The system is based on the theory of space-filling, in our case a two dimensional space, represented by a matrix 3x12
(the roulette table layout).

It would be interesting to see if there is someone here on the forum who can create a software able to test millions of boules using the indications given in the system.

Also the idea expressed by ugly bob is worth further.

Thank you in advance 

[Priyanka]

The system is based on the theory of space-filling,

Interesting theory

It would be interesting to see if there is someone here on the forum who can create a software able to test millions of boules using the indications given in the system.

Are you using any progression at all? If not, I already have an excel tracker created which I can share, which can test more than a million spins limited to excel's abilities.

[winner3]

Thank you Priyanka, for your kindness.

Is necessary to apply a progression, +1 if you lose the 9 spins cycle and -1 if you win at any point on the 9 spins cycle,
if you were to find in surplus of just one chip reset the progression and restart with 1 unit bet.

Interestingly, the greater is the output delay of the last line more likely to end the cycle of 9 spins in win ..

[Andrey86Pak]

Did the test in the manual for 450 spins. After winning missed 6 spins.

[Priyanka]

Here you go. Not tested properly, but you can use it I guess.. 
The password for unlocking is "Goodluck" in case anyone needs to edit formulae.

- Yanks

[TwoCatSam]

Yanks

Maybe it's me, but I can't get this sheet to use all the numbers.  Take a look.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

winner3

Would you explain your concept of "space filling"?

Sam

[Priyanka]

Maybe it's me, but I can't get this sheet to use all the numbers.  Take a look.

Sam its not you, I have done only for ~ 1000 rows so that the excel size is minimum. How many rows will you need? I can get it extended.

[TwoCatSam]

I'd want 5,000

[Andrey86Pak]

Spins for testing. 

[Priyanka]

I'd want 5,000

This should take you to 10,000

[winner3]

Thank you very much Priyanka the latest tracker released work perfectly 

Go ahead and publish your test results, if after 1 millions spins you Always win with a decent capital (1000-2000 chips)

we will find ourselves in front of the holy grail 

In a few days will give you a detailed explanation of the theory on the space-filling.

Thanks again for the good work Priyanka