How scared would you be if you found… the holy grail?

[TwoCatSam]

Yanks

You have created a very good sheet.  Many thanks!

Sam

[Proofreaders2000]

Yanks

You have created a very good sheet.  Many thanks!

Sam

...and you snub me and Winner3?  Shame on you.

The followers of this thread have been through
enough with Spin4Fun deserting.  No snide remarks please...

[TwoCatSam]

Proof

Lighten up, Bro!  I merely meant the mechanics of writing the actual Excel sheet.  I could not reference the content of the sheet without testing.  I have and it loses. 

I politely asked Winner to explain the logic behind it.  I feel there is none. 

Sorry to be such a downer.  The numbers I personally saved from SmartLive Auto Roulette.  Maybe that's the problem.  Maybe they need to be RNG or real spins by a human.

[Chrisbis]

He (Spin4Fun) has not deserted........... 

[buffalowizard]

He (Spin4Fun) has not deserted........... 

Course not, he's loving it

[ugly bob]

How about this for an idea!

Start with 1 unit bets.

Go up 1 on a win. Down one on a loss.

Always restart when in profit.

Going up on losses never makes sense to me. Why throw more money at it when things are going against you?

[Proofreaders2000]

Start with 1 unit bets.  Go up 1 on a win. Down
one on a loss.  Always restart when in profit.--Ugly Bob

Sounds good.  Each new session (if the session won before it) go up
one unit.  The thing is there is no guarantee the new session will win.

(Regardless of how many times the system won in the past)

[ugly bob]

There is nothing worse than using a negative progression and just falling short of getting to that new high. A few more losses and you are back in the hole again.

Why not decrease the bets when the variance is going against you and increase them on a winning run.

A few quick wins raising the bets can wipe out a lot of losses at a lower level.

It really seems counterintuitive doing it the other way around.

Disclaimer: It is possible I could be wrong however and doing this would absolutely make no difference. 

[ugly bob]

Here is just a made up example.

Game 1. Betting 1 unit. Lose all 9 bets. Running total -18.
Game 2. Betting 1 unit. Lose all 9 bets. Running total - 36.
Game 3. Betting 1 unit. Win on bet 4. Running total - 26.
Game 4. Betting 2 units. Win on bet 2. Running total +2. Reset here.

It just means a bad run might not wipe you out before you hit a good run.

[Proofreaders2000]

With small stakes perhaps-*progressions and large bets typically do not work.

[Priyanka]

I have modified the excel to add some parameters, which will help you decide what to do on a win, on a loss and on a new high. As usual, a bit lazy to test it out myself. Use it as you feel right!

Cheers
Yanks!

[Tomla021]

..Too me I have modified to even chance bet?  But I'm busy enjoying life this summer,, with or w out grail ,,, life is good

[winner3]

Guys keep in mind that I have never studied English have patience.

Explanation of the theory first part :


This system for roulette originates from my own setting in physics related to the topic of non-current definition of a true theory of the gravitational field and its interaction with the other forces of nature.

The assumption on which it is based (this system) is that a blow out is nothing but a mass that is going to place in a specific area of the space attracted by the force (value) of the background field existing in probabilistically predetermined way.

This definition is the space that its values​​, according to which is to determine which number should go out, stems from the belief that these are already present a priori, and in recursive mode.

[Priyanka]

Guys keep in mind that I have never studied English have patience.

Explanation of the theory first part :


This system for roulette originates from my own setting in physics related to the topic of non-current definition of a true theory of the gravitational field and its interaction with the other forces of nature.

The assumption on which it is based (this system) is that a blow out is nothing but a mass that is going to place in a specific area of the space attracted by the force (value) of the background field existing in probabilistically predetermined way.

I thought April 1 is months away.  . Sorry winner, just kidding
With all due respect winner, can't understand a single word. Did anyone else understand?

[winner3]

if I find a good translator from Italian to English i continue with the explanation if not, it is better that I give greetings to all 

Good luck to all and my speech on the forum ends here 

I thank all those who have followed me all the way until here.