How scared would you be if you found… the holy grail?

[Priyanka]

OMG! What did I do!

Hey winner, I was just kidding around. Your English is perfectly fine. It is just the explanation which am not able to get. I for one definitely don't want to end your speech here as I eagerly look for inputs. It is just that I am not able to get what you were explaining.

Probably, it will be better if I ask straightforward questions. You mentioned, "a true theory of the gravitational field and its interaction with the other forces of nature." I got lost here. If I consider a "Wheel" where the ball is going to land as the one that attracts a specific area of force as you put it, then why chose carpet layout for placing the bets and why not neighbours in wheels.  If I consider RNG, then will any theory of gravitation apply there?

To be honest, am confused. My intention is to seek clarification and not to ridicule the language as the language is perfect, it is just the concept that is complex. Look forward to more details from you.

- Yanks

[Proofreaders2000]

Good luck to all and my speech on the forum ends here.-Winner3

Please stay.  Your contribution is significant
and I (and others) would like to hear more.

[ugly bob]

Hello, I did some testing using the progression tweaks I mentioned above.

Here are some results.

Game 1) 1 unit. W 506 reset.
Game 2) 1 unit. L 488.
Game 3) 1 unit. W 504.
Game 4) 2 units. W 508. reset.
Game 5) 1 unit. W 514. reset.
Game 6) 1 unit. W 516. reset.
Game 7) 1 unit. W 522. reset.
Game 8 1 unit. L 504.
Game 9) 1 unit. L 486.
Game 10) 1 unit. L 468.
Game 11) 1 unit. W 480.
Game 12) 2 units. W 512.
Game 13) 3 units. W 524. reset.

Just remember.. if I lost game 13. I would go back down to 2 units.

+1 on a win.

-1 on a loss.

Always reset on a new high.

[Proofreaders2000]

Try this progression suggestion Ugly Bob.

Plus one unit on a winning session, less two units on a losing one.

[Priyanka]

Try this progression suggestion Ugly Bob.

Plus one unit on a winning session, less two units on a losing one.

You can do this easily in the latest excel I published. You just have to modify the progression fields to say what to do on a win and what to do on a loss. You will get the results in no time.

[ugly bob]

Thank you guys for the suggestions.

Game 1) 1 unit. W 506 reset.
Game 2) 1 unit. L 488.
Game 3) 1 unit. W 504.
Game 4) 2 units. W 508. reset.
Game 5) 1 unit. W 514. reset.
Game 6) 1 unit. W 516. reset.
Game 7) 1 unit. W 522. reset.
Game 8 1 unit. L 504.
Game 9) 1 unit. L 486.
Game 10) 1 unit. L 468.
Game 11) 1 unit. W 480.
Game 12) 2 units. W 512.
Game 13) 3 units. W 524. reset.
Game 14) 1 unit. W 538. reset.
Game 15) 1 unit. W 550. reset.
Game 16) 1 unit. L 532.
Game 17) 1 unit. W 544.
Game 18) 2 units. W 552. reset.
Game 19) 1 unit. W 562. reset.

At first glance, this looks a safer way to play. There is no point watching a graph go sky high knowing that eventually you have to give it back. We can go to the funfair if we want a scary rollercoaster ride. 

[ugly bob]

Just a final word of caution.

Game 1) 1 unit. W 506 reset.
Game 2) 1 unit. L 488.
Game 3) 1 unit. W 504.
Game 4) 2 units. W 508. reset.
Game 5) 1 unit. W 514. reset.
Game 6) 1 unit. W 516. reset.
Game 7) 1 unit. W 522. reset.
Game 8 1 unit. L 504.
Game 9) 1 unit. L 486.
Game 10) 1 unit. L 468.
Game 11) 1 unit. W 480.
Game 12) 2 units. W 512.
Game 13) 3 units. W 524. reset.
Game 14) 1 unit. W 538. reset.
Game 15) 1 unit. W 550. reset.
Game 16) 1 unit. L 532.
Game 17) 1 unit. W 544.
Game 18) 2 units. W 552. reset.
Game 19) 1 unit. W 562. reset.
Game 20) 1 unit. L 544.
Game 21) 1 unit. W 554.
Game 22) 2 units. W 566 reset.
Game 23) 1 unit. L 548.
Game 24) 1 unit. L 530.
Game 25) 1 unit. W 538.
Game 26) 2 units. W 554.
Game 27) 3 units. L 500.
Game 28) 2 units. W 512.
Game 29) 3 units. W 560.
Game 30) 4 units??

You are 6 units behind your previous high here. If you lose this game, you are at 488.

You could just reset again at Game 30. It depends how risk averse you are.

I think this would be a good plan just to try and win 50 units or so and then quit. It would not require a huge bankroll. 372 spins and you certainly get your money's worth!!

[TwoCatSam]

OMG! What did I do!

You did nothing.  The post to which you refer was the best example of bloviation I've seen since John Legend left the forum!!

Here is the scenario; I've seen it play out many times.

Some person posts some outlandish system with not even the slightest bent toward reality.  Nick or someone would write a sheet and the RNG function would prove the system won't work.  (No harm there.  We try; we fail; we try again.)  Then the author finds some reason to get their hackles up and leave the forum.  Someone--you in this case--is blamed for that leaving.  "Well, if you're too dumb to understand me I'll just find some smarter people."  I even saw it in horse racing years ago.

People "seem" to think that if they can make their explanation sound esoteric and complicated, the forum will think them brilliant.  This reminds me of an old saying:  If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshoot.

Let's all scrape off our feet and continue the journey.

Sam

[ugly bob]

  This reminds me of an old saying:  If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshoot.

This pic always gives me a laugh!

[TwoCatSam]

I love it.  I once owned a spray can of B.S repellent...

[Proofreaders2000]

People "seem" to think that if they can make their explanation sound esoteric and complicated, the forum will think them brilliant.  This reminds me of an old saying:  If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshoot.--TwoCat

In Winner3's defense the framework was
helpful to cobble together something useful.

[Turner]

@Sam

you missed off "....then come back as somebody else"

[D1]

This pic always gives me a laugh!

Hey Bob
This is the one that always cracks me up !!!

[Proofreaders2000]

John Legend I can understand being wary of (though there
are some that will always think well of him).  But Winner3 bad? Really?

[ugly bob]

Proof,

I don't think anyone is having a go at winner3. Some of us are just having a laugh amongst ourselves.

Now if you really want to read some b.s. 

link:://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/tables/14878-these-shoes-are-made-for-talkin/#post263709

This bloke is on the shortlist for the ''TCS bloviator of the year award''