A new bet method?

[GLC]

Vladir,  I like your idea.  It still results in a possible steep draw down, but it should take a really bad run to do it!!  We should be able to stay in the game waiting for the hot streak to bring our wins.

[vladir]

Vladir,  I like your idea.  It still results in a possible steep draw down, but it should take a really bad run to do it!!  We should be able to stay in the game waiting for the hot streak to bring our wins.

And what progressions would you suggest? Clearly you have much more experience in progressions then me, I would like to know what you would suggest

[GLC]

And what progressions would you suggest? Clearly you have much more experience in progressions then me, I would like to know what you would suggest

Vladir,  I don't think the progression will make any difference.  You could use a basic +1 on a loss and -1 on a win for each progression.  You could use a simple 3 or 4 5 step capped martingale.  You could use Oscar's Grind of +1 after each win and stay the same after each loss.  A limited Fibonacci of maybe 1-1-2-3-5-8 would suit your temperament.  Colbster's doublet D'Alembert progression he's been working on lately would be as good as any and better than most.

The thing I don't like about my whole idea on this topic is that you end up playing most of the time in the 1st bet line because we always bet from it after a Win.  That means we will be betting from the 1st bet line almost half the time and the 2nd bet line only about 25% of the time.  The 3rd bet line only about 12% of the time, etc...

Test it with Colbster's doublet D'Alembert and see what I mean.

GLC