A simple system that works

[beretta28]

Everyone knows that deviation(ecart) is the rule and the balance(equilibrium) is the exception.
In 100 spins the most likely ecart between 2 chances is 10!
Everyone knows also that playing ALL the spins for hours is a suicide.
So I suggest:when an even chance has 5 outcomes more than the opposite,I play in order to reach an ecart of 10 outcomes
Example:15 Black,20 Red......I play Red.
If I lose,I stop playing and I wait for another difference of 5, if I win,I can continue to reach  10 or I stop playing,if my win goal is +1.
Play flat bet(boring) or smooth progression


Personally I play with a bankroll of 10000 â,¬ and a 50 â,¬ unit and a win goal of 2 units per day.Bread winner progression or 10 times 1 unit,10 times 2 units etc
Never bust after 94 sessions.

Golden rules:
--To play this system on classic even chances is not suitable,the killer session could happen.
Much better to create YOUR even chances(3 double streets vs other 3s,agglomeration vs isolated spin,half roulette on the right vs half on the left,etc)
In this way the permanence is more stable.

--Try to obtain your goal(ecart between 6 and 10) in 100 spins minimum,not less.

[teo]

You doing this on Enprison table at MC casino,I pressume.
Every day??

[ozon]

Why    dont   wait   for  inbalance   of   10   ,and    play   for   balance    with   soft   progression.

[beretta28]

I enter a Casino 80/100 days per year.
To tryry to reach a balance after an inbalance is too risky.
The balance is an exception and an inbalance higher than 10 is very frequent in 100 spins.

[biagle]

I'm talking about my attachement, column marked blue.

so you got 236 lines 5 more hits vs 145 lines (marked red). Now you bet one time for 236 again? If you win stop, wait next 5+, if lose stop too and wait another 5 difference?

thanks, biagle

[beretta28]

Almost OK..
If you win(6+) you can go ahead, trying to reach 10+ or you can stop if your win goal is +1!
Personally I have a win goal of 2 units and after the first win(+ 1 unit) I change chance and I try to obtain the second unit with agglomeration vs isolated, that in my opinion is more stable than 3 double streets vs 3 doubles streets
The first unit agglomeration vs isolated Rvs B for instance,the second unit agglomeration vs isolated High vs Low or even/odds etc
But I know people that prefer like you 3 double streets vs 3 double streets.

[biagle]

can you explain please for unintelginet what means agglomeration vs isolated

[beretta28]

RBBBBR:here you have an agglomeration at Black
BBBBRBBR:here you have 2 agglomerations at Black and an isolated at Red.After the last Red ,if a Red hits it's a second agglomeration at Red,if a Black hits.it's a second isolated at Red

[biagle]

can you give some exampled how you played/would play

[GLC]

28,

I find this very interesting.  It reminds me of a system used in baccarat, except in reverse.  See below:

For either Mode use 60% as the start point as this is close enough to both optimum figures.
This equates to 6 out of every 10 or expressed in shorthand is 6/10.

Below is a table to use.

6/10, 9/15, 12/20, 15/25, 18/30, 21/35, 24/40, 27/45, 30/50, 33/55, 36/60, 39/65, 42/70, 45/75, 48/80.

For Mode 1 tracking, add up the total Bankers and Players to give the bottom figure in the equation, and if either Banker or Player first exceeds the top figure then you Start the Bet Phase. 

Example if Banker and Player total 25 and Banker is 16 then the bet phase has started and you would bet on Player.

As you can see, the author suggests that we play for the deviation to correct itself.  In other words, we're betting the cold even chance will get hot and the hot even chance will get cold. 

Whereas you are playing for the hot factor in the equation to get even hotter. 

This may be the ultimate trend system!

Granted, in baccarat there aren't all the options for different even chances to bet on.  This must be very boring in baccarat, but could have plenty of bets in roulette to stay interesting.

GLC

[andrebac]

Everyone knows that deviation(ecart) is the rule and the balance(equilibrium) is the exception.
In 100 spins the most likely ecart between 2 chances is 10!
Everyone knows also that playing ALL the spins for hours is a suicide.
So I suggest:when an even chance has 5 outcomes more than the opposite,I play in order to reach an ecart of 10 outcomes
Example:15 Black,20 Red......I play Red.
If I lose,I stop playing and I wait for another difference of 5, if I win,I can continue to reach  10 or I stop playing,if my win goal is +1.
Play flat bet(boring) or smooth progression


Personally I play with a bankroll of 10000 â,¬ and a 50 â,¬ unit and a win goal of 2 units per day.Bread winner progression or 10 times 1 unit,10 times 2 units etc
Never bust after 94 sessions.

Golden rules:
--To play this system on classic even chances is not suitable,the killer session could happen.
Much better to create YOUR even chances(3 double streets vs other 3s,agglomeration vs isolated spin,half roulette on the right vs half on the left,etc)
In this way the permanence is more stable.

--Try to obtain your goal(ecart between 6 and 10) in 100 spins minimum,not less.

B., tx for sharing.
When your trigger appear, do you play one decision or more till positive?

[GLC]

Since Baretta28 hasn't responded, I will give some thoughts I have on this bet.

Once we have a 5 hit difference, we are expecting that difference to increase to 10 within the 100 spin cycle.  Let's say Red is at 35 and Black is at 30.  We're expecting Red to pull head by another 5 hits which means that we will have at least 5 RR's in order to reach +10.  We could have RR then RRRR  then RR and that would do it as long as we didn't have multiple B's to off-set the R's.

So, this means that we could wait until a Red hits and then bet for a second R since we know that in order for Red to continue to pull ahead of Black we have to have multiple Reds in a row.  As soon as we are +1, we end the attack.

28 suggested a bread winner type progression of 10 losses each level.  That means we bet 1 unit until we are either +1 or -10.  If we reach -10, we go to 2 unit bets until we reach +1 or -30 etc...  This is not exactly how the bread winner system is played, but it should work.

If Black overtakes Red and we have something like 60 Reds and 60 Blacks, we stop betting for Red and wait until we have another 5 hit difference by one of the colors.  At that time, we continue where we left off in our progression but we will be betting on the even chance that is ahead by 5 which could be either one.

From our example above, we're expecting at least 1 more R than B if we're playing for R to reach 10 from 5, so even a flatbet should win in the long run.

I am not saying this is how Baretta plays this, just some of my thoughts on it until he can get back to us.

GLC

[beretta28]

GLC
your explanation is perfect as well as your english.....
Thank you very much
You are right,Bread Winner is different from 1 unit 10 times,2 units ten times and so on.
Also flat bet can work,but like all systems ,you can have difficult sessions with long losses,and flat bet is boring.
Personnaly, I  prefer progressions above.
And I don't play Red vs Black,High vs Low or Odd vs Pair.I play series vs single on threes even chances at the same time.More stable.....
Win goal +2,bankroll 200 units.

[klw]

Hi --- beretta28 hasn't logged on here in a few months so not expecting an answer off him any time soon but can any other experienced roulette player please explain how series versus singles is more stable than a traditional even chance ?

Quote from beretta28

" And I don't play Red vs Black,High vs Low or Odd vs Pair.I play series vs single on threes even chances at the same time.More stable.....
Win goal +2,bankroll 200 units. "

As far as I can see series versus singles displays all the characteristics of a normal even chance,perhaps I've missed something ?

Cheers.

[GLC]

klw,  Welcome aboard mate.  I just love being the first to respond to a new member's 1st post.

Mathematically you're correct.  Betting series vs singles is no different than betting Red vs Black.  In 1000 spins, perfect distribution would be 500 singles and 500 series.  In 1000 spins, perfect distribution would be 500 Reds and 500 Blacks.  Believe me, Baretta28 is fully aware of this.

I have read other authors who state that the series vs singles seems to do better than Red vs Black or Odd vs Even etc... One such system is Predictor Gold where the author states that for some reason his tests indicate that betting series vs singles performs better.
Another system is the BV system.  This is built on tracking singles vs series instead of Red vs Black.  The author states that the system was tested in 4 casinos for a whole year at 50 or less spins per day.  Each casino netted about 2500 units per year.  If you do the math, that's 6.8 units for every 50 spins or .136 units for each spin.  Not a glowing result other than it's a winning result.

That's the best answer I can give.  Other than beware, past results are no guarantee of future results.

GLC

Additionally, the author's system that can be found on this forum, uses Same vs Opposite as a bet selection method.  If you think about it, that's another way of saying Series vs Single.