37 spins, 1 Dozen Will Always Have 2 Repeating Numbers In It

[amk]

After millions of spin tests it has been shown that there will always be a minimum of 4 repeaters in a 37 spin cycle.

This then implies that 1 dozen, which one we don't know, will always have 2 or more repeaters in it during a 37 spin cycle.

Infact, 1 dozen and 1 column, will always have 2 or more repeaters in it during the same 37 spin cycle.

I wanted to present this observation to see if any good methods can be developed around it?

Any ideas out there : )

[ati]

I've been chasing the repeaters in the last couple days on BV. My strategy is simple, I always bet on the last five numbers, starting with one unit on each, and after losing two times, I add one more unit to each number until I win.
I first tried in fun mode a couple times, and I always made 2-300 unit profit in about 50 spins. It's seems to be a bit harder to win in real money mode, and of course much more scarier. Two times I was down 6-700 units in real mode, before the repeat finally happened. And this progression has a limit, after betting 7 units on each number, the amount can be win, will not cover the previous losses.
Overall I made some profit, but I'm scared to continue playing this.

[Colbster]

Rather than chasing all the repeats, you could track until repeats start showing up and then only bet the units hit in the dozens that have the repeats in them.  This should slow down the entry into the betting cycle and minimize the number of spaces covered.  Play with whatever number of units need to be bet to cover the losses so far in the 37-spin cycle, thus ensuring a profit with any hit.  Play until a hit and start fresh immediately after.

[amk]

Thanks for the ideas so far!

One idea I have is to randomly select a dozen.

Play all hit numbers in this dozen until 4 repeaters have shown.

If you do not have a win stop, then either start the process again with the same dozen or select another random dozen.

Continue with your progression and play all hit numbers (starting with one) in this dozen until 4 repeaters have shown.

etc....?

[Colbster]

Selecting a random dozen puts you in the position of maybe not being in the right place at the right time for a hit.  If you wait until 4 repeats have happened, you might have won 1 time or you could have lost to both of the other dozens getting repeats twice or one dozen getting 3.  If you only play dozens that have a single repeat so far, you cannot miss the first dozen to get the second repeat.  Assuming your initial premise is correct (and I have no reason to doubt it), my method is fool-proof.  You cannot bet more than 33 spaces per session, meaning that any hit would yield some sort of profit if you have the same bet on each space.  Simply increase the units per unit to cover the bets you have already made and it is a done deal.

I wish I would have come up with this sooner!

[Turner]

Ok....on status...a rough idea.....very much a Turner like idea.

There will be 2 repeats in each doz.

if we see 1 repeat in a doz....we know there will be another in 37.....

We don't know there will be 1 more until we see 1. So wait for 1

So we see a repeat in D1....and see 1,2,2,4,5 have hit, 2 being the repeat. now bet 1,2,4,5 because these are the best candidates to hit double because the others havnt even hit yet.

You can do this by tracking 37....but its hard.

You can also do this by tracking a lower number until you see a repeat. You now add that dozens contents and any future numbers.

I tried this.

In RX.....chose statistics - numbers, then we set Options - configure to track the last 15.

Why 15?

most marques are 15 or so....in other words, look at the marquee

pick the dozen which has 1 repeat and if there are 2, the one with a repeat and the most hits. Add numbers of that doz as they hit.

See attached...play the 3rd dozen,

betting 32,33,34,36

17
6
32  HIT

In summary. Look at the marquee for a repeat. See if its the only one in a doz or col. Play all contents of the D or C...adding hits as you go.

There is better than this, which i will think about.

[Colbster]

No need to overthink this.

If we wait until our first repeat in a cycle of 37 spins, we will have already skipped the first 4-10 (just for consideration, not statistically important here).  That means that in the next 25 spins or so, we will get a repeat out of a dozen that already has a repeat, taking the original idea from AMK as factual.  All we need to do is keep betting the spins that have already shown, but only in the dozen(s) that have already had a repeat.  This keeps us in a smaller group of numbers for longer, minimizing our bankroll needs and maximizing our profits when we get the 2nd hit that we expect from at least one dozen in 37 spins from AMK's original premise.  I have spent the past couple hours on this getting hit after hit after hit.  The only limitation I can see is table limits, as it is going to hit.

[Turner]

Didnt i just day exactly that?

[amk]

Thanks for your insights Turner and Colbster.

Always appreciate it.

[rouletteKEY]

I've been chasing the repeaters in the last couple days on BV. My strategy is simple, I always bet on the last five numbers, starting with one unit on each, and after losing two times, I add one more unit to each number until I win.
I first tried in fun mode a couple times, and I always made 2-300 unit profit in about 50 spins. It's seems to be a bit harder to win in real money mode, and of course much more scarier. Two times I was down 6-700 units in real mode, before the repeat finally happened. And this progression has a limit, after betting 7 units on each number, the amount can be win, will not cover the previous losses.
Overall I made some profit, but I'm scared to continue playing this.

I play that way from time to time with the last 3 or 4 numbers...I have the most success with a strict stop-loss and lean progression.  It usually comes in waves so I wait for a "virtual win" and then play it till I get 2 or 3 wins within 7 or 8 spins per attack or hit the stop-loss and wait for the next opportunity to attack.

[Proofreaders2000]

You can always separate the dozens into lines or
streets and track the hot numbers in those individual areas.

[MrJ]

What I like about this......its something that WILL happen.
As I prefer to call it >>"EVENT BETTING"


Ken

[vundarosa]

The only limitation I can see is table limits, as it is going to hit.

------------

do we really need a progression?!

vundarosa

[kingsroulette]

Can someone please let me know as to how do you think this "exclusive knowledge" be utilized?

After millions of spin tests it has been shown that there will always be a minimum of 4 repeaters in a 37 spin cycle.

This then implies that 1 dozen, which one we don't know, will always have 2 or more repeaters in it during a 37 spin cycle.

Infact, 1 dozen and 1 column, will always have 2 or more repeaters in it during the same 37 spin cycle.

If there are some repeats (everybody knows law of third and repeaters coming thereby) why and how do we look it to be a part of any dozen or column or any EC?
        Everybody know repeats are guaranteed. The question is how to exploit such probability.

[kingsroulette]

Only sure shot way to catch on it to play every number that wins till we get a repeater. This way, we will need a progression that can be even harsher than martingale.