• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Sectormov

Started by ignatus, Jan 27, 02:16 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

ignatus

Quote from: Turner on Jan 30, 03:17 AM 2014
Calm down Ignatus mate. I just wish you would stick at one thing for a while. If this is so good and I have to test it....why will you be presenting something completly different in 3 days. that's all I'm saying.

im not sticking with a system as long as it fails, but obviously more testing is needed, and i really need to get this to  work with rx-scripting... we'll see

If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Turner

Good luck with that one. I struggled with RX. Ive managed to doctor existing ones but never from scratch. Just a manual tool now....one I hammer daily

ignatus

i've done it. it was not so hard, like this :

if number 0 has hit each time
  begin
  put 1 unit on split(3-0)
  put 1 unit on split(1-4)
  put 1 unit on split(11-12)
  put 1 unit on split(14-15)
  put 1 unit on split(13-16)
  put 1 unit on split(19-20)
  put 1 unit on split(32-33)
  put 1 unit on split(35-36)
  put 1 unit on number 6
  put 1 unit on number 21
  put 1 unit on number 26
  put 1 unit on number 28
  put 1 unit on number 30
  end

  if number 1 has hit each time
  begin
   put 1 unit on number 3
   put 1 unit on number 9
   put 1 unit on number 10
   put 1 unit on number 20
   put 1 unit on number 24
   put 1 unit on split(1-0)
   put 1 unit on split(5-6)
   put 1 unit on split(14-15)
   put 1 unit on split(16-17)
   put 1 unit on split(22-25)
   put 1 unit on split(26-27)
   put 1 unit on split(31-34)
   put 1 unit on split(32-33)
   end


i've only done 5 numbers so far, and it doesn't look good when running some test
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

superman

Quotei've only done 5 numbers so far, and it doesn't look good when running some test

Now there's a suprise, how strange. :o
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

ignatus

you can make fun of me, right, but atleast i was the one doing all the work: inventing the strategy. program all 37 different bets. making the tracker. doing manual testing for 300 spins, that is 21*300 =6300 bets, for manual testing and then program and running it in rx. took me 3 days. what have you done except complain superman? come up with something better yourself
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

it's all a learning experience. and i've learned some good things from this (like how to program rx...)

but this thread/strategy is dead now.

thank you
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

iggiv

Ignatus i tried and tested such things long long time ago, and not just on 300 spins like u but rather on long long periods. What u r trying to do is the day before yesterday for me. But u don't need advices. You know better. Good luck. It was  a last time when i gave u my opinion about what u r doing. You like to listen to yourself only and u don't take advices. So keep doing a great job by stepping on the same rack.
U consider yourself a genius who is the only one to come up with such ideas, but they were tried long long time ago already, and by many people.

There is a guy Katilla, which long time ago checked different angles, different combinations of numbers to work with those angles and he did not claim himself to be a genius like u. And he did much bigger job than u. What u r doing is only a small part  of what he did. 

Ok, that's enough bout it. Keep it up, big guy.

iggiv

by the way i had a good advice to how to make your job with RX easier and more productive, but i won't give it to u. No help from me anymore. Thanx to your nice behaviour.  Good luck.

superman

Quotewhat have you done except complain superman? come up with something better yourself

I've been coding roulette methods for over 7 years now, still am coding them.

The reason I stopped posting them years ago is because they ALL fail, live with it.

Atleast now after your 3 days learning RX you can code it, test it, forget it and move on to the next idea WITHOUT telling us about it.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

TwoCatSam

Geez, we're beating the H out of ignatus today.  He DOES post in the notepad and we don't HAVE to read him.

I agree!  What he posts is "Old Hat", but let's just let him run with the wind. 

Frankly, I like the guy!

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

iggiv

He has to learn how to behave. If u give this guy an inch he will try to take a mile. if u don't react accordingly he will turn this forum into a nest of snakes. Just going personal with everybody on every occasion he finds. NO-NO. I won't let it happen. This is a friendly forum. If u criticize someone's views on roulette it has nothing to do with attacks on personality.

I don't mind his roulette "discoveries" as long as he does not flood the main forum sections. but this guy has other issues as well. Now he will have a day to take a rest and become nice again.

KoolKat

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jan 30, 12:25 PM 2014
Geez, we're beating the H out of ignatus today.  He DOES post in the notepad and we don't HAVE to read him.

I agree!  What he posts is "Old Hat", but let's just let him run with the wind. 

Frankly, I like the guy!

Sam

I totally agree 2catsam, I have looked at the same amount of spins as earlier today but from a different angle just betting the straight up numbers excluding the splits profit is 856.

Ignatus don't give up mate

Koolkat

iggiv

going this way u have to consistently change your variables. This is a game where stiff patterns don't work.

Turner

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jan 30, 12:25 PM 2014
Geez, we're beating the H out of ignatus today.  He DOES post in the notepad and we don't HAVE to read him.

I agree!  What he posts is "Old Hat", but let's just let him run with the wind. 

Frankly, I like the guy!

Sam

I like you too Ignatus ....dont get me wrong. You just confuses the hell out of me.

Proofreaders2000

I can feel the love between you two Turner and Ignatus <3

It brings a tear :'-)

-