Which online casino is the best + Invincible system to reveal

[denzie]

So 1-3 has a better chance of a win result compared to the longer 1-3-9 or 1-3-9-27.

Really?  My guess is.....Nope. They both lose the exact same amount when time goes by. Wanna bet ??

[cht]

Really?  My guess is.....Nope. They both lose the exact same amount when time goes by. Wanna bet ??

I'm stating this based on actual distribution samples performed over a large sample size. I didn't carry out this test, I'm merely citing their reported results which surprised me.

[denzie]

Sorry guys I’m watching the champions league. I’ll answer to everything later.

Anderlecht gonna score .... 1-3

[kingmaq]

Why ? Seriously?  How long are you playing roulette?  I don't mean this in a bad way but....Ive been on dozens way to long. But that also gave me the knowledge about how they behave and what's possible. It won't win. Not even with that very good mm. Play progression that needs 80 wins vs 1 loss ? Uhm nope. Big nope. At least switch it to bacc.

But there are of course bet selections that would do very good with this mm. It's not streets also. Or code it and you will see the outcome.

Best of luck to all. Hotties 

What about this >
Two bets are made on every spin: Low (1-18) and the 3rd Dozen (25-36) with a basic bet 3/2 > 9/6 >33/22 > 74/36

will it work with steven's MM?

[denzie]

What about this >
Two bets are made on every spin: Low (1-18) and the 3rd Dozen (25-36) with a basic bet 3/2 > 9/6 >33/22 > 74/36

will it work with steven's MM?

Aha the standard dumbo bet. (It think it was GLC who called it that)... With That progression?  I'm sorry but no . 

[Madi]

Why ? Seriously?  How long are you playing roulette?  I don't mean this in a bad way but....Ive been on dozens way to long. But that also gave me the knowledge about how they behave and what's possible. It won't win. Not even with that very good mm. Play progression that needs 80 wins vs 1 loss ? Uhm nope. Big nope. At least switch it to bacc.

But there are of course bet selections that would do very good with this mm. It's not streets also. Or code it and you will see the:
Dont say it denzie otherwise they gonna call you fool.u cant do calc.

[Madi]

Dont say it denzie otherwise they gonna call u fool and u cant do calc

[ati]

Let's wait and see if someone skilled enough will simulate this idea. It can be done, since all the rules are written in stone, and any bet selection on dozens supposed to have the same odds of winning, no matter how "clever" the selection is.
My experience so far is not very good. 4 sessions and I lost all of them. I don't have an opinion yet, I need to see the results of many sessions, but I know that I should lose more than I win.
In the examples, there is an assumption that on average we would only lose 40 units per losing session. I'm not sure about that, I'd like to see a proof. Either test results or mathematical.

[cht]

Tbh, I tend to agree with denzie with his no call. It's just too long we need to go short. That's why I don't use doz, streets or lines as per.

[denzie]

Dont say it denzie otherwise they gonna call u fool and u cant do calc

Lol. That's ok. But just replaced the batteries in my calculator though. Works just fine. 


But still a very nice mm !!!!!

[romano0327]

Thank you for speaking about me Denzie,   I am cool with it, I take all you said,  you can go on...

[Madi]

No iisue but only with superior bet selection

[Madi]

Even hotties will come ahead without mm.

[denzie]

and any bet selection on dozens supposed to have the same odds of winning, no matter how "clever" the selection is.

Bingooooo.  How hard it is to believe. ....Your spot on 

Btw cool rims. 

[denzie]

Even hotties will come ahead without mm.

Well there's always some form of mm. But I get what you mean....