Which online casino is the best + Invincible system to reveal

[steven1212]

ok so lets get back on topic

this is a tweak to the original method, the pdf document you shared on page 9?

has not busted once in three years?

My system can’t bust. With patience you’ll always be green.

[RouletteGhost]

is it the same method from page 9 but tweaked?

[steven1212]

is it the same method from page 9 but tweaked?

The secret can be applied to the bet selection described on page 9 since it was invented at the same time and it will make you money whenever you have time to sit at a roulette table for a few hours.

That being said I have improved by bet selection in the past three years just to make the play more fun and efficient. I’ll tell you about this too if you continue being nice.

[Andre Chass]

I'm already spending my money. I'm going to a restaurant with two blondes I hired ...

[steven1212]

I'm already spending my money. I'm going to a restaurant with two blondes I hired ...

I hope they were 150 each and that you will cover them in two spins.

[Andre Chass]

I hope they were 150 each and that you will cover them in two spins.

Haha... Just kidding

[steven1212]

Haha... Just kidding

You know that my secret could me applied to make your hit and run system pretty invincible too, now that I think about it ...

[cht]

I read page9, code4 understood what Steve's idea is all about.

This idea can be remodeled to adapt it to dilute the impact of zero - this is highly recommended. For 5steps marty,  243 consecutive wins is just one cycle, meaning one loss is -243chips. Can you be so unlucky for that last 11sequence to repeat as per that particular pdf sequence at the time of your play, IDK? Whatever you still need to win consecutively 243times for one full cycle.

Tbh, such steep marty is not my style of play at b&m casino - too risky and returns just way too small, meaning poor risk reward ratio - no gain actually. Well, Steve says he has secret sauce, so I'll wait to see how this risk reward ratio can be improved.

Meanwhile, I ran some test on random numbers an idea spawned from code4 based on flatbet - average of 9wins every 150spins with minimal drawdown, looks pretty good, now testing with live data from local b&m, see if this winrate holds up over larger live sample.....lets see.....

[steven1212]

Thanks for the message man. Don’t waste too much time of testing millions of numbers. My secret makes it adaptable to every kind of risk level you may wanna take. And it makes it bullet proof. Soon you’ll know....

[boyd30]

Trying to find some information about Code 4. Is this the best thread to read about it? link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=9537.0
Atlantis had some tweaked version about it, but I can't find it. Somebody know?

[atlantis]

Hi boyd30,

I believe that this was the first topic about CODE 4
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5848.0

[boyd30]

Hi boyd30,

I believe that this was the first topic about CODE 4
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=5848.0

Thank you Atlantis! I will look into it.

[steven1212]

Fyi, I just played 3 hours of my system as I got tempted with all our talks. Hadn't played it in several month. Result 33% roi un 3 jours. Conclusion it still works.

[cht]

Fyi, I just played 3 hours of my system as I got tempted with all our talks. Hadn't played it in several month. Result 33% roi un 3 jours. Conclusion it still works.

Assume your br is 243units, 81units over 3hrsx60=180spins is normal rate. When you're up 2430units, that'll be 10cycles then you might have something. For it to be even considered a possible winnable system, you got to be looking at 2430units x 5 = 12150units. The approximate eta is 12150units/81unitsx3hrs = 450hrs. Assume 5hrs of play a day, that's 90days away. Still 2430units is the first milestone to achieve ie. 2430units/81unitsx3hrs = 90hrs/5hrs per day = 18days away.

IF I understand your method correctly especially as to this br of 5steps marty, that's what it is. That's why I'm lukewarm to your system no matter.  not knocking your system but stating it as it is.

*this calculations is to take into consideration the risk of ruin

[atlantis]

Ok. Fair enough cht. But remember if you "assume" something you'll almost always be wrong.
We don't know his bet selection OR his progression steps yet... However, its good to state abt the maths and cycles relating to a marty on this.