• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Which online casino is the best + Invincible system to reveal

Started by steven1212, Jan 31, 01:39 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 60 Guests are viewing this topic.

denzie

Well I was wrong. Anderlecht didn't score anymore. Damn. Was close but nope .... My bad
As spins roll off our predictions get better

cht

I won't convince you guys. Results from tests over varying lengths of play don't show identical distribution that goes against common logic.

Madi

assumption that on average we would only lose 40 units per losing session. I'm not sure about that, I'd like to see a proof. Either test results or mathematical.
[/quote]

Thats a fitting to show his mm works on dozen

Madi

@denzie

Last question. Does any clever dozon approach can come ahead with this kind of mm?

steven1212

To quickly answer Denzie in his past comments, I agree with you that dozens aren’t the best way to play, but you can’t say they won’t work. They’ve worked for me at one point, and they work for others.
Still regarding all you said, I did mention for a long length in my original post that this system shouldn’t necessarily be played with any method in particular. What’s important is the mm. the rest is whatever floats your boat... our suits your guts.
I personally suggested in that same post to play it with shorter sessions. Like 10 spins or so.
And there is an important reason for that. E If in one month you win 50 sessions and lose 60, you make much more money than if you win 15 and lose 15. The base of this system is abou volume. The more sesssions you play the more exponential the growt. Even with mediocre results.

And to answer to Madi, yes you clearly didn’t understand anything and you embarrassed yourself in front of everyone today. You should hide for a few days after the show you made today.

steven1212

Quote from: David926 on Sep 27, 02:24 PM 2017
Hi Steven, great mm here and I'm planning to use a particular system with the progression of 1-2-4-8.
From what I understand, I'll have to win around 15 times in a row (or double my 1/5th bankroll amount) to consider a session a win for my case if I'm not wrong.
Doesn't that mean for progressions like double dozens 1-3-9-27, you'll have to win around 80 times in a row just to consider a session a win?
That sounds pretty crazy and impossible unless I'm getting this wrong Steven.

The mm works with every system. Anyone can play how they want. I personally like shorter session of around 10spins.

steven1212

Quote from: denzie on Sep 27, 04:03 PM 2017
Really?  My guess is.....Nope. They both lose the exact same amount when time goes by. Wanna bet ?????

No need to bet. You are 100% right.
And this is what the introduction of my original post is about. Everything evens out over the long term. The wheel will give you exactly what you are supposed to get, and that is a reality that gets closer and closer to the probabilities the longer you play.

cht

Quote from: Madi on Sep 27, 04:56 PM 2017
assumption that on average we would only lose 40 units per losing session. I'm not sure about that, I'd like to see a proof. Either test results or mathematical.


Thats a fitting to show his mm works on dozen
I just tested a hybrid model based on doz strat posted on this forum with 1-3 progression and the result after 10sessions is +20%. I was surprised but that's only for 10sessions of 40spins each.

denzie

Quote from: cht on Sep 27, 05:06 PM 2017
I just tested a hybrid model based on one doz strat

Now we're (starting) talking  :thumbsup:
As spins roll off our predictions get better

denzie

Quote from: Madi on Sep 27, 04:59 PM 2017
@denzie

Last question. Does any clever dozon approach can come ahead with this kind of mm?

A double dozen. ...Nope
But that's my humble opinion.  :thumbsup:
As spins roll off our predictions get better

Madi


steven1212

Here are the result and explanation for the first day of betting on the account of one of our fellow forum member.

Starting balance: £240
Current balance: £266.88
Total ROI: 11.2%
Session count: 0 wins - 0 loss

I am currently still in the first session. This attack has a bet size of £80. Not many games to play with yesterday, yet all the bets placed have won. I am hoping I can finish this first attack today, or get close to this at least. Keep in mind that weekends are the busiest time in football.

On another note, like I predicted it, Europe is red and blue this morning   >:D >:D >:D

steven1212

A little more info for you to understand how the money management work and the attacks are structured. I only placed 7 bets yesterday. Kind of like 7 spins at the roulette. 3 of them broke even. The other 4 won. Each bet was a stake of £80.
Hoping I can accelerate things a bit today.

atlantis

Hi denzie, madi,
I was thinking if this could work for roulette on that Double Doz selection method "ADD - Against Dominant Dozens" which uses a progression of 1-1; 2-2 stop?
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18607.msg173479#msg173479

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

cht

Quote from: atlantis on Sep 28, 04:50 AM 2017
Hi denzie, madi,
I was thinking if this could work for roulette on that Double Doz selection method "ADD - Against Dominant Dozens" which uses a progression of 1-1; 2-2 stop?
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18607.msg173479#msg173479

A.
I was waiting for your response about double doz. Ofc the strat I tested and still ongoing is this one that I coded on excel earlier - ADD.  :thumbsup:

-