• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Which online casino is the best + Invincible system to reveal

Started by steven1212, Jan 31, 01:39 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

psimoes

I don´t mind the mechanical methods not winning all the time. The problem is in making the wins happenning at regular intervals.
So, we have chaos vs order. If ordered betting over chaotic spins produces an LW at random intervals, does that mean if we make chaotic bets it´ll produce ordered LWs? Nope, for that to happen, the outcomes ought to be non random. Chaos wins.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

Steve

Players eventually lose because their system doesnt work. Because it doesnt change the odds. Because they dont know how to, or dont care to learn.

The required information is easy to find. Its mostly just being ignored. Or badly misunderstood. When misunderstood, theres usually no real effort or care to understand. Players go in circles.

You dont need to be a roulette guru to see the blatant mistakes players make. Anyone with reasonable understanding can see it.

You can progress a lot quicker by trying to understand what others know, why they know it, and how ypu can validate it yourself.

Its like learning to write english. You can try to figure out what all the letters mean, or just learn from someone who knows. One approach is reasonable, the other just wastes time.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

i wonder if it was all spellled put in a way so blatant it cant be ignored, would people change their approaches??

Thing is it has been done, many times. And still ignored.

Seriously when i was a newbie, i didnt really care for the math or logic. I just wanted it to work how i wanted. Wanting didnt change reality, and i wasted years. But eventually i put aside what i wanted, and learned and accepted the truth as it.

ignoring the truth generally doesnt end well.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

can anyone specify where steven1212 revealed his big secret? I cant seem to find it.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

psimoes

Here´s an example: First LW is from betting 4 streets, second LW from betting 8 streets, third LW from betting single columns. Notice how the Ws happen as randomly as with any other method.


Tisch:                       Tisch 1
Datum:               2017-10-03

********* Gewinnzahlen ********
N  Z  R
6          6
2        L 8 W L
       5  L 4 W W
      34  L 2 W W
       1  W 2 L L
11        W 4 L W
2        L 6 W L
29        L 8 W L
2        L 1 W W
       3  W 4 L L
       7  L 2 W W
       3  W 5 L L
35        L 4 W W
2        L 6 W L
    0     L 6 L L
10        L 7 W L
15        L 4 W L
29        L 6 W L
       7  L 4 W L
      19  L 5 W W
13        W 9 L L
24        L 6 W W
      16  L 4 W L
      25  L 2 W W
-- -- -- 
    0     L 2 L L
      21  W 5 L L
      16  L 3 W L
28        W 4 L L
       1  L 5 W W
8        L 4 W W
      34  L 2 W W
      30  W 5 L L
35        L 4 W W
      32  W 9 L L
8        W 8 L L
       7  W 6 L L
      21  L 9 W W
31        L 4 W L
      30  L 7 W L
      23  L 3 W L
22        L 7 W L
      12  L 1 W L
20        W 3 L L
      18  L 3 W W
      25  L 1 W L
2        W 3 L L
24        L 9 W W
      19  L 1 W L
35        L 9 W L
[Math+1] beats a Math game

psimoes

Quote from: Steve on Oct 04, 07:49 AM 2017
can anyone specify where steven1212 revealed his big secret? I cant seem to find it.

It´s on page 53
[Math+1] beats a Math game

Steve

thanks, i read it now. unfortunately i cant see anything in it that would assist long term or sustained profit. But at least he took the time and effort to share. he at least deserves credit for sharing.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

cht

Quote from: Steve on Oct 04, 08:24 AM 2017
thanks, i read it now. unfortunately i cant see anything in it that would assist long term or sustained profit. But at least he took the time and effort to share. he at least deserves credit for sharing.
I agree.

He uses his MM to good effect with his football bets which he demonstrated has net positive edge.

foreverBOB

Hi,
Out of curiosity I have made a simple test in excel on random numbers single zero.
The bet is fixed on 5 lines except the numbers 0-6 and starts after 2vW.
If we get a loss within 5 attempts, we wait for the next trigger.
The Total BR is set to 1000 and divided in 5 banks of each 200.
The bet therefor is 40

Please take a look and let me know if anything is missing.

Bob

cht

Quote from: foreverBOB on Oct 04, 08:29 AM 2017
Hi,
Out of curiosity I have made a simple test in excel on random numbers single zero.
The bet is fixed on 5 lines except the numbers 0-6 and starts after 2vW.
If we get a loss within 5 attempts, we wait for the next trigger.
The Total BR is set to 1000 and divided in 5 banks of each 200.
The bet therefor is 40

Please take a look and let me know if anything is missing.

Bob
Break them up into 1000spins each session. Be the casino to book your bets, meaning bet opposite of what you do now. If the result is one-sided ie. it consistently lose or win over 50K spins you might have a winnable bet. ;)

kingmaq

Quote from: cht on Oct 04, 08:42 AM 2017
Break them up into 1000spins each session. Be the casino to book your bets, meaning bet opposite of what you do now. If the result is one-sided ie. it consistently loses or win over 50K spins you might have a winnable bet. ;)


Oh my shit !
You started with a bankroll 1000 and left with 1,6

What a losing strategdy !

psimoes

Quote from: foreverBOB on Oct 04, 08:29 AM 2017
Hi,
Out of curiosity I have made a simple test in excel on random numbers single zero.
The bet is fixed on 5 lines except the numbers 0-6 and starts after 2vW.
If we get a loss within 5 attempts, we wait for the next trigger.
The Total BR is set to 1000 and divided in 5 banks of each 200.
The bet therefor is 40

Please take a look and let me know if anything is missing.

Bob

After a loss within 5 spins, the first bank of 200 is lost. According to Steven´s rules, the previous winnings must be added to what´s left of the BR. In your test you started with 1000, had a W (1000+40), which was immediately followed by a L. BR now is 1040-200. Now you divide the 840 by 5 banks.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

foreverBOB

psimoes,
yes you are correct, the new unitsize is calculated this way, adding the earlier wins of a loser cycle to the total net to get the /5 calculation again for the nextcoming bet.
If we reset everything once a bank of 200 unit is won, things dont get that ugly anymore....
But overall, it will not yield enough, not even to break even long term.

kingmaq

Quote from: foreverBOB on Oct 04, 08:55 AM 2017
psimoes,
yes you are correct, the new unitsize is calculated this way, adding the earlier wins of a loser cycle to the total net to get the /5 calculation again for the nextcoming bet.
If we reset everything once a bank of 200 unit is won, things dont get that ugly anymore....

Dear Bob

Would you mind correcting the excel and reuploading it?

Thx

psimoes

And some will argue you can´t win against RNG...

[Math+1] beats a Math game

-