New simple matrix system - Need testers

[steven1212]

Hello,

I have been trying a new matrix system for the past few days. It has worked great so far. It's possible that someone already thought about it or even wrote about ti because the idea is so simple. But I like it because while it's not recommended to play it all day long, it doesnt really need to hit and run either. That's because the odds of wining are much better than with the columns and even chances matrixes. And the bankroll needed, while quiet big, is not insane either.

I will explain later today, but I have only tested for about a week so I need people to try it on live roulette to see how it works for eveyrone.

See you later. Cheers

[steven1212]

Ok so the system is very simple. Remember Pattern Breaker? You just need to use the same concept but with lines (6 numbers):

There are 6 lines. Number them 1-2-3-4-5-6

When you sit at the roulette table wait for 4 spins and write down the lines sequence.

Example: 3-1-4-6

Now all you have to do is bet against this lines sequence appearing again. The odds that this same sequence appears again is 1 out of 1296! Pretty unlikely if you ask me. Let's say you use 5$ units. On the first try you bet against line 3 appearing with chips of 5. If you miss, bet agaisnt line 1 appearing with chips of 25. If you miss, bet against line 4 with chips of 125, and if you miss again bet agaisnt line 6 with 625.
I know it's a big progressions and this system wont be for everyone. Personally I dont mind risking the money if Im quiet sure I will win, and over a week of trial, I won 90% of the bets on the first try. I also NEVER reached the third step yet so I didnt really need to risk big money.

What do you guys think 

[Chris555p]

Hi Steven

I tested something similar on real roulette; We are basically playing 5 double street
i.e 30 chips in order to win 6 chips. The risk / reward is too high imo.

I think that playing Pattern Breaker as it is described by JL is a very good system;
I have been playing it for almost a year with excellent results. Vast majority of win
is within 3 spins; No double loss since I have been playing it. The risk for loosing is
almost nil.


Cheers


Chris

[RouletteGhost]

Hi Steven

I tested something similar on real roulette; We are basically playing 5 double street
i.e 30 chips in order to win 6 chips. The risk / reward is too high imo.

I think that playing Pattern Breaker as it is described by JL is a very good system;
I have been playing it for almost a year with excellent results. Vast majority of win
is within 3 spins; No double loss since I have been playing it. The risk for loosing is
almost nil.


Cheers


Chris

PB is good

[jekhb76]

The Gap between Risk and Reward is too Big!

[sugtips]

The Gap between Risk and Reward is too Big!

how about using virtual losses, will it reduce the Gap between Risk & Reward??

[foreverBOB]

This can be coded easily in excel and will show that it wont win long term.
Virtual strategies wont help. Winning so little against losing the complete series will eventualy result in more wins than losses but bankwise you will end up negative.

But please do test if you wish, its just my humble opinion.

Bob

[sturrock]

Sorry, But PB has been mentioned, again in this post. I have tried it always and always lost wtf ?