Supa Dupa Random Streets Bet

[SpinASequence]

Well. I went to the casino but there is not much to report!
I won 16 units in the first three spins and cashed in!

Either I am in the right place at the right time or this REALLY works!

It IS random. The dealer has to repeat the previous pattern the moment I sit down to play. Plus the SET numbers which we are using have their roots in the house system which is like no other!
It is COMPLETE random!

I know there are posters on here who will insist it's just 24 numbers against another 12.
Maybe so - but it's winning!

Anyway here is the record -

I was fortunate because as I readied myself and sat down to play the dealer spun 0. Timing or random? Who cares!

Recorded the first three spins :

1-4-1

4-7-4
First bet 2 chips on SETS 4-7. Won. + 8
Second bet 1 chip on SETS 1-7. Won. +12
Third bet 1 chip on SETS 4-7. Won. + 16
Goal achieved! Cash in!

Rest of the numbers while I watched. No bets.

4-1-1 LWW
1-4-1 WWL
7-1-1 WWL
7-7-1 LWL
4-1-1 WWL

Good luck!

SAS

[SamNL]

Tested the bad session from yesterday again.

This time not stopping after a win but playing like SAS is doing now.
Goal is to win 10 units.
Playing with the Foolproof Progression I now hit that goal.
Going to continue my test at DB.

[SamNL]

Played another 4 sessions just now on DB with my goal of 10 units per Table.

Won +12 at each table with relative ease with the Foolproof Progression.
Highest unit was 2.

[redback]

Hi SamNL

Would you mind showing how you did this with the foolproof method.  I have only just read the method and I am not very mathematical.  Truth is I have always struggled with it.  I understand the concept just would like to see visually how you applied the method to the SDRSB (abbreviated the system for ease).

Would be very much appreciated.  Understand if you can't.

Thanks RB

[rossco]

Have not tried this method yet, but I will very soon. I think you have " hit on '  to something really worthwhile with this SAS. Thank you for sharing with us ! Ross.

[rossco]

Very cool system SAS. Well done.

Just tried it with 100 pounds chips on each house and made 1,200 pounds in less than 5 minutes. Played 3 times with a win on the first bet every try. 400+400+400 added to my BR.

I think the system is great but it needs a very good money management to go with it. I dont believe that a martingale 1-3-9 could work. It's the problem we had with Johnlegend systems. Eventually you will lose three progressions and when you do you will BUST! Too risky.

For now, it looks like flat betting, played hit and run, is very good because of the frequency of hits on the first win. But I'm sure it can still be improved. 2:1 bets are tricky for money management.

What's your staking plan so far?

Thanks for sharing.

Cheers

WHAT YOU SAY STEVEN,  I AGREE WITH ALL OF IT.   Ross.

[JimmieB]

Another bad session for me if betting every spin....

1 1 7
1 1 7 lll
1 7 7 lwl
1 1 1 lww
1 x x l stopped after the l at 1

Although, I do think there is something workable with this system, I’m going to look a trigger of not betting until you have either 2 losses in a row, or, 2 out of the 3 are losses (you could even wait for 3 in a row or 3 out of 4, could be a long wait though!), if you lose the bet wait for another trigger. Target is +8 units, game won when you have reached your target, or, lost when you have had 3 betting losses. Flat bet for 5 bets, if after the 5 bets you are minus, and haven’t had 3 losses, move up to2 units per bet until you reach your target, or, you reach the 3 betting losses, you could also move back to 1 unit betting if you get your BR back in the positive....

My thinking behind this is win 3 games out of 4 and you should be at least +4 units, 24 from 3 wins, and a maximum loss of 20 from the lost game. Not a great return, however, requires less of a BR and the bets don’t get to out of hand which suits my low risk approach, just the thought of 8 units per bet makes me sweat ,  over a 100 games this could net you at least 300 units.

Just my thought on this system, any feedback welcome....

[SpinASequence]

Hi J,

You were really unlucky to run into that sequence. It hasn't happened to me - yet! But it's only a matter of time I am sure!

If you are patient I am sure your interpretation will pay dividends and like you I am not one for risking too much of my BR!

I think there are a number of ways to play this and win.

I had a thought of playing the two dominant SETS with foolproof progression.

In your example above you would have made a killing, but there again how to pick up the trend early enough!?

SAS

[atlantis]

Playing after 2 L's might help or maybe use simplified GLAT progression (for 2 doz):

W  end set at +.  Bet next set at same unit size.

LL end set.  Bet next set at +1 unit to current bet sizes.

LWW end set at even.  Bet next set at same unit sizes.

LWL end set.  Bet next set at +1 unit to current bet sizes.

I was using that with a 2 doz system.
Problem always happens when you have to recover due to going down quite a few units because of stuff like this; which happened to me not long ago on SmartLive:

0
0
L
0
L
0
L
L

But I agree this system is promising with correct money management.

A.

[Chris555p]

Played this system last night, with foolproof variation progression at my local
BM and I made 10 units profit very easily.

Then changed table restart all over again and 10 more units for 2nd session.

Wash, rinse and repeat at antoher table and again another 10 units for 3rd session.

30 units profit very easily made. What more can we want.....?? Thanks SAS for sharing
this great and very easy system.

[SamNL]

Yesterday I had 6 losses after each other. The BR that was required with the Foolproof progression with that session would be around 1000-1500. Way too much for my liking. I stopped after some time but if I played on I think I could have recovered with the Foolproof progression but the BR that was required is just way too much.

This system can work really good but when disaster strikes it's just too hard to recover and the BR that is needed is too high in that case.
I'll try to post my session when I can.

[SpinASequence]

Sam,

Try waiting for 9 spins then bet the 2 dominant houses.

What is your trigger? I like to play after 777, 111, or 444.
Also with a new dealer or after 0.

I haven't encountered any problems with a bad run at all. But I know it's just around the corner......so I am making hay while the sun shines!

Well done Chris. That's the way to play it - with iron discipline!


SAS

[Chris555p]

@ SAS yes thanks;  I think if we switch table after a few wins we can play
for longtime; we can increase our win goals / target very easily; Even
when we do get hit with LLL's, the profit we have already made will far offset the
losses.....anyway; and Foolproof variation progression will put us at new br high
very quickly.

[SpinASequence]

Hi Chris!

After looking at Jimmie's and Sam's disastrous run of numbers or SETS let's see if we can turn this round to make it a 2:1 bet.

I am not really happy betting odds on with a lot of progression and I know it's only time till my good fortune runs out!

Instead of betting AGAINST the dealer at 1:2
Let's bet WITH the dealer at 2:1

Same numbers - same SETS.

The grand pattern over 9 spins should look something like this :

1-4-4
4-1-7
7-1-7

...or in any combination of 3 x 1 - 3 x 4 and 3 x 7. Agreed?

But we know this is unlikely to happen if we keep refreshing the 9 spins.

So. Let us bet the dominant SET @ 2/1 with foolproof over the next 9 spins.

Here is an actual example from Betfair Live Casino just now :

Wait 9 spins

1-7-4
1-1-1
4-7-7

The dominant SET is 1. So we bet SET 1 with 1 chip.

1 comes in and we profit 8 chips.
No more bets because we won first spin.
Next 2 spins are 7's

Now our up to date 9 looks like this

1-1-1
4-7-7
1-7-7

Now the dominant SETS are 4 and 7 with 4 hits each. We can either bet the two SETS, or as I did bet one of them. I chose 7 and lost. You know it don't you?
1 came in!

So now profit is +4.

I carry on with SET 7 and bet 1 chip again. We win! Now we are + 12. No more bets for that line. Next number is 4

So next 9 looks like this :

4-7-7
1-7-7
1-7-4

Dominant SET is still 7 so we bet 7 again with 1 chip and bingo! It goes in again! Now we are +20. No more bets for that line which end up with 1-4

So, our refreshed 9 looks like this :

1-7-7
1-7-4
7-1-4

Although target has been reached I carried on to see what would happen. I bet 7 again as it was dominant.

Next 3 numbers were 1-1-1

I bet I chip on the first 2 losses and 2 chips on the third loss. Now we are +4

Next bet is 2 chips and bang! In goes 7 for a juicy 16 chip profit making +20 again.

It is again a hit and run strategy. By the time the missing SETS catch up we will be gone!!

Have a play around with it. Does not eat into the BR as much and I would rather bets 2:1 rather  rather than 1:2 and I would rather be betting what is happening instead of what is not happening!

That's the beauty of these threads and all the input. Very often a better way of playing comes from them?

Anyway. Keep testing and keep discussing!

Good luck!


SAS


If I haven't explained it properly let me know?

[SamNL]

Hi SAS,

Thanks for sharing your new way to play this.
I will test this and report my progress.