Supa Dupa Random Streets Bet

[SpinASequence]

Foolproof progression is probably the best, not so scary.......

Can you post some examples Chris?

[warrior]

4 losses in row will kill you happens more often then you think.

[SamNL]

Can you post some examples Chris?

I think Chris means this progression:

link:://betselection.cc/gambling-philosophy/fool-proof-progression/

I am not sure about it though. But Chris can answer if I am right or not.

[JimmieB]

4 losses in row will kill you happens more often then you think.

First test, 4 L's on spins 16,17,18, & 19....

Maybe worth considering not betting until maybe 1 or 2 virtual losses, and stop if the following 2 are also losses and wait for another trigger??

[SamNL]

Am testing this at the moment.

But I see an incredible amount of LW happening at the moment at DublinBet. All eating up my Fun BR

[Chris555p]

I will post example of foolproof variations progression later on.

For those interested in this great progression, see p 46 of attached link.

link:s://:.dropbox.com/s/zmwixa1giyo9rsm/Stetson%20Bailey.pdf

[SamNL]

Thanks Chris,

Am doing another test with the Foolproof Progression now.

It may be just what it needs, especially when the LW constantly hits

EDIT:

I have tested the same session with the Foolproof progression now and it goes downhill quick if I do that. Multiple losses after a row kills this.

[warrior]

Matrix has been studied to death they don't work lose 2 win one no advantage.

[Chris555p]

SamNl

Test it with the variation foolproof progression as described on p.46

[SamNL]

That's what I tested it with Chris, the Foolproof Progression as described on P. 46

It tanked quite a bit with the session I had on DB.

[Chris555p]

Stop on 3 LLL's; Wait virtual win and then continue with foolproof variation;
That's the way I play it with excellent results.

[steven1212]

Very cool system SAS. Well done.

Just tried it with 100 pounds chips on each house and made 1,200 pounds in less than 5 minutes. Played 3 times with a win on the first bet every try. 400+400+400 added to my BR.

I think the system is great but it needs a very good money management to go with it. I dont believe that a martingale 1-3-9 could work. It's the problem we had with Johnlegend systems. Eventually you will lose three progressions and when you do you will BUST! Too risky.

For now, it looks like flat betting, played hit and run, is very good because of the frequency of hits on the first win. But I'm sure it can still be improved. 2:1 bets are tricky for money management.

What's your staking plan so far?

Thanks for sharing.

Cheers

[Turner]

Hi Turner,

Ive been flat betting and always come out in front.  It is because you get so many bets win on the first spin!!!
Only done a couple of hundred spins so time and spins will tell. We need lots of people testing

Sorry to be an old negative party pooper. Its just "3 dozen pattern wont repeat, bet the opposite DD"

Its the same mathematically. It wont perform any better.

check the pattern of 3 different sets of 12 then bet that pattern wont repeat.

4 losses happens more than you think....said Warrior. He knows. I know.....you dont seem to know. its obvious to me.


all groups of 12 are identical. 3 make 36. Thats it.

[steven1212]

I agree with Turner too. It was the problem with JohnLegends matrixes system. They all end up busting, more often than you think. I've seen pattern of 6 or 7 repeat too. That's why it cannot be played martingale.
But the strike rate of this system seems very good and im sure with some kind of flat betting you can come out ahead. Need testing...

Sorry to be an old negative party pooper. Its just "3 dozen pattern wont repeat, bet the opposite DD"

Its the same mathematically. It wont perform any better.

check the pattern of 3 different sets of 12 then bet that pattern wont repeat.

4 losses happens more than you think....said Warrior. He knows. I know.....you dont seem to know. its obvious to me.


all groups of 12 are identical. 3 make 36. Thats it.

[nottophammer]

corals 30mins ago

ran along side flat/viles d/s worked fine.


Flats
d/s,   num, dupa str
5         28      1
6         33      4
5         27      7 no bet
6         36      7
5         29      1
3         13      4 no bet
2T        9       7
5Win   30      1
6         32      4 no bet
6         32      4
1         1        1
1         5        4 bet 1/7
4         19      1 win
4         22      4
5         27      7 no bet
6         31      4
3T       14      4
3 win  14      4 bet 1/7
3        15      4 chiped up to 3 unit
5        29      1 win
5        29      1 bet 4/7
6        35      7 win
3        17      7
3        17      7 bet 1/4
1        4        4 win