Against 4

[ignatus]

This is an EC-strategy.

Trigger: bet against four of the same repeat-pattern

R
B
R
B
R

Now, bet for this patten to end, bet Red

B
B
B
B

Now, bet for this pattern to end, bet Red

Progression: Martingale

[Proofreaders2000]

You're saying it will not go over 1,2,4,8
(the fourth step in the progression)?

15 unit bankroll (per one unit base bet)?

[ignatus]

in most cases it will win, in extreme cases it will lose, so for shorter sessions it may work

[parsnip]

I've done this before and got 17 reds in a row. It does happen and it'll totally destroy your bank roll when it does.

[ausguy]

If you followed the wheel 1B4L (the one before the last), [not against it] = Reds or Black alternating hitting or all Black strings or all Red strings hitting (or any other similar EC pattern) would give up winners, YES ?

MM + bet strategy = profit.      Ig./others test this with your own spins, betting std. Marty. Use a L8 EC progression for example as available at Party Casino (PC) Live Dealer :

L1 = 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256 = L8. Here's some spins from PC play last month & I didn't play Ig's method or this follow the wheel idea but wished I had (= 1B4L).

Trigger spins A. 33B, B. 11B.    Spins & all 1B4L bets - bet 1. 2B  2 W +2, 29B 2 W +4, 28B 2 W +6, 23R 2 L +4, 17B 4 W +8, 31B 2 L +6, 5R 4 L +2,

16R 8 L -6, 3R 16 W +10, 3R 2 W +12, 5R 2 W +14, 20B 2 L +12, 20B 4 L +8, 1R 8 L +00, 2B 16 W +16, 29B 2 L +14, 2B 4 W +18, 33B 2 W +20,

21R 2 L +18, 3R 4 L +14, 11B 8 L +6, 32R 16 W +22, 23R 2 L +20, 23R 4 W +24, 11B 2 L +22, 9R 4 W +26, 27R 2 L +24, 14R 4 W +28, 24B 2 W + 30,

5R 2 W +32, 33B 2 W +34, 9R 2 W +36, 17B 2 W +38, 8B 2 L +36, 21R 4 L +32, 34R 8 L +24, 36R 16 W +40, 9R 2 W +42, 22B 2 L +40, Z 4 L +36,

23R 8 L +28, 33B (Z) nil bet, 36R 16 W +44, 13B 2 W +46, 21R 2 W +48, 25R 2 L +46, Z 4 L +42, 19R 8 W +50. Bet line 48 & end of sample bets.

So close to 45 minutes of betting & 50 ($, Euro, GBP, it's players choice) won off a 2 minimum. The progression stayed in the bottom 1/2 of the outlay risk. Not a large sample I know but certainly worth testing or even playing, YES/ NO / MAYBE ?

[parsnip]

This sort of strategy feeds into the gamblers fallacy that the next one HAS to be black. It'll fail eventually its just a matter of time.

[ausguy]

Yes PARSNIP most of us already know that, so how about some solutions/answers ? Many of my suggestions below will easily handle 17 REDS in a row & have a player on an ascending profit pathway.

As I've previously said "MM + BET STRATEGY = PROFIT".

Betting opposites to the last spin in the 3 EC choice strands may work better than single focus R/B betting ? These being 1. L/H 2. E/O 3. R/B in running order of bet lines which repeat & reset as in 1,2,3, : 1,2,3, : 1,2,3, : 1,2,3, & so on it goes & 12 bet lines we have showing here.

Using my spins from before lets see how the bets would go for just 12 bet lines.   Trigger spin is as per B. = 11B. : opp. 1. H & 2B = L, 2. Odd 29B W,

3. R 28B L. 4. Low 23R L, 5. E 17B L, 6. R 31B L, 7. Low 5R W, 8. E 16R W, 9. B 3R L, 10. H 3R L, 11. E 5R L, 12. B 20B W, & end mini test.

So in 12 bet lines we had : L W L L L L W W L L L W. 4 winners & 8 losers. Highest bet level risk to L5. Again playing std Marty (Martingale) we would have been in profit. Obviously the progression doesn't need to be Marty, it can be anything of a players choosing. Also as a string loss circuit breaker a player could set a stop loss after maybe a L3 or L4 loss ? It does need 2 back to back wins to profit played with Marty. This would have worked in the 12 line demo as lines 7 & 8 were both winners.

Single focus OPPOSITE colour betting may be less risky with stop loss betting in the plays ? How about single focus SAME AS colour betting with stop loss betting in the plays ? How about alternating the two as in OPPOSITE TO then SAME AS single focus play with or without stop loss betting in the plays ? How about a combination of all the above where you virtual bet a few choices & continually switch to the bet plays that are trending the most positive ?

Another option could be to have the 3 betting strands run as alternating SAME then OPPOSITE pattern. This forms a 6 line repeating set where each strand has a SAME & OPPOSITE event within the set. Zero insurance bets at higher bet amounts are also an option. With these bets I usually add the Zero bet amount to my EC bet for a 1 : 1 return if the EC bet wins, as the Zero outlay is then nuetralized. If Zero hits then pre calculated amount should always cover the EC losses + return at least 1 : 1 profit. In practical play I always work it that I get more than 1 : 1 = a bonus for good strategy play.
Zero bets don't add too much to the BR budget.

I don't use RX but can it's program handle stop loss betting & "switcher roo" plays ? If it could it would be good to test the many moods of the wheel, especially those RUNS FROM HELL ?

[Proofreaders2000]

As an added safeguard you could designate an exact
time to play this system and play one session per day.

[parsnip]

As an added safeguard you could designate an exact
time to play this system and play one session per day.

Hmm, but why? The first session could destroy your bank roll with the same likelihood of the 57th session.
As you may have guessed, I'm against progressive systems lol.