Cluster EC

[ignatus]

a very simple and effective method.

trigger: wait for a switch between two ec's then after two of the same appear bet for a third to come. each trigger is played only once.


for an example

R
B
R
B
B

next bet would be B

or

R
B
B

next bet would be B

likewise

B
R
R

next bet would be R



progression: Martingale

[Turner]

Why?
Because you are betting that the least likely event will always happen.

Why would you bet that the least likely event will always happen?

Please explain

[ignatus]

Why?
Because you are betting that the least likely event will always happen.

Why would you bet that the least likely event will always happen?

Please explain

well, it's a very frequent patten, that an EC will hit more than twice.

playing this on the other hand it's a very frequent pattern that color will switch also, so playing the exact opposite bet would also be a good bet. (haven't tried that yet)

but it works anyhow, betting for a third ec to hit.

[ignatus]

More spins...

[buffalowizard]

Doesn't work, the amount of series of colours, be it 2,3,4,5 or whatever will hit the same amount as singles. It's an illusion that they're safer because you have to wait around longer for them!

[ignatus]

doesn't work? have you even tried it

[Skakus]

doesn't work? have you even tried it

LOL!

[Skakus]

LOL!

Make that RBL!


I'm sick of LOL 'laugh out loud' so I've come up with a my own one, RBL 'roaring belly laugh'

[Turner]

You dont have to re-invent the wheel (no pun intended)

Bet the last, or bet one before last (which is good for series or chops) is better than this rigid idea.

Also, after 2 years here, I cant believe you still suggest martingale.

its a Newbie idea.

Even Golden Progression is better or some strategy with 122....or anything GLC has come up with.

Anything except Martingale.

If you are going to play "hope" and "recover" ...you need a good progression or strategy.

And you cant hope for more than 50% chance minus HE by virtual spins or looking back.

(another wasted 5 mins of my time)

[ignatus]

but then, you don't like it that's one thing. Have you played it? No.

[Turner]

but then, you don't like it that's one thing. Have you played it? No.

Your arrogance is your undoing. You think you know best...you take no advice.

Thats why you still play novice ideas with novice progressions.

If you were anything higher than a novice, you would know why this isnt a good idea, and you wouldnt need me and others to tell you it isnt. You would know yourself. Especially after 2 or 3 years of being in forums with very knowledgeable people.

Same response in the other forum you posted it....

See...if you considered other peoples experience as helpful, and respected others opinions, you wouldnt keep posting novice ideas, because you would realize the idea was bad, and that you will get negative response.

But you keep posting novice ideas to experienced people, with no respect for them.

You, Ignatus, your lack of respect for experienced people, and arrogance is why you are still a novice.

[ddarko]

but then, you don't like it that's one thing. Have you played it? No.

link:://:.hilariousgifs.com/guy-bangs-head-on-wall/

[ausguy]

If he'd really headed a wall & not a flexible wire fence he wouldn't have walked away like he did. Anyone in doubt try it yourself on a solid wall.

[buffalowizard]

doesn't work? have you even tried it

Yes I have played it actually - looked at series for months a few years back, thinking like you, that blocks of EC's must be better to bet on or against....wait for 4 reds then bet black....wait for 3 highs then bet low etc etc.
Problem is, those blocks can still rack up in sequences long enough to destroy your bankroll, just as betting on single EC's can - like I said, it just takes longer because you're not betting every spin, surely your studies would have highlighted this point

[Skakus]

aussie-bogan-headbutts-windscreen-1.wmv