Negative/Positive progression hybrid

[RouletteGhost]

The experts here may like this? Let me know if it is flawed...GLC? lol

It is my stretched martingale

10 10 20 20 40 40 80 80 160 160 320 320

but here is how you do it: if you WIN the first bet you continue in the progression until you lose, when you lose, reset. reset when you lose and start back at 10.

now if you lose on the 1st bet, or lose at 10 after you reset then you switch to the negative progression and continue along until you win. once you win reset back to 10 and start over.

so to recap, if you win the 1st bet treat it as a positive progression and continue along until you lose. if you lose the first bet treat it as a negative progression and continue along until you win. always resetting back to 10. you are looking to take advantage of streaks. If it switched to a negative progression all you have to do is guess right by id say the 8th bet then it shouldnt be too hard to recover

[Kav]

if you win the 1st bet treat it as a positive progression and continue along until you lose. if you lose the first bet treat it as a negative progression and continue along until you win.

Great idea.
Just remove the zeros, they clutter the progression.
1 1 2 2 4 4 8 8 16 16 32 32

Btw, I woudn't use this progression. I would use something more gradual like the N progression or maybe Fibonacci: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34

[RouletteGhost]

Im not familiar with the n progression. But yes the fibo would be much safer

[GLC]

Your progression is only slightly safer than the original martingale.  I have actually tested it up to 111112222244444888881616161616etc... and eventually it tanks like all the rest.  You just have to pick your poison, hold your nose and take your medicine.