high/low streaks

[RouletteGhost]

we all know red/black and odd/even can streak for a long time and kill a bankroll if you are a negative progression fellow

however, I have heard people say high/low doesn't streak AS MUCH

what is the record anyone has seen for a high or low streak? not as often as the others?

what I am getting at is this: maybe a negative progression isn't so bad if you bet against a short streak of say 3?

I know high or low showing three times and betting against it does not change the odds but lets face it rarely are there terribly long streaks

[ugly bob]

12 million spins.

link:://betselection.cc/math-statistics/12-million-rng-spin-stats-shared-by-poit/


There is no major difference between any of the e.c's.

[RouletteGhost]

oh wow did not expect that, they all repeat about the same

[ddarko]

oh wow did not expect that, they all repeat about the same

why, apart from hearing it from other ppl did you think H/L would be different please rich ?



BTW, just remember RNG is different from a live dealer, IMHO

[RouletteGhost]

why, apart from hearing it from other ppl did you think H/L would be different please rich ?



BTW, just remember RNG is different from a live dealer, IMHO

i dont play RNG

and i just thought it was the way of it, i thought statistically high and low had less streakiness

[ddarko]

i dont play RNG

and i just thought it was the way of it, i thought statistically high and low had less streakiness

the reason I mentioned RNG is because those 12 million spins ARE RNG 

[RouletteGhost]

the reason I mentioned RNG is because those 12 million spins ARE RNG 

oh, then im not interested in it lol

i used to play rng and the software is definitely designed to beat the player

[ugly bob]

oh, then im not interested in it lol

i used to play rng and the software is definitely designed to beat the player

LoL, I am sure the guy who created the software to find out these stats did not rig them! 

Think about this.....

Everything roughly balanced out over those 12 million spins.

However, there would be no casinos if everything balanced out like that in the short term.

Therefore , the challenge of the games present this unique paradox. The short run is inequitable to the long run! So when it comes to gaming relationships and probabilities, though the whole is still equal to the sum of its parts, the parts themselves are not simply abbreviated versions of that whole.

Some food for thought right there!