3 Double Streets as an EC (deserves its own thread)

[Proofreaders2000]

Test: RichBailey86's Three-Double Streets System @ Celtic
Casino American Wheel-Thursday, October 2,2014 @ 10:24pm CDT USA

...35 (newest spin-value)

Bet L4-9, L16-21, L28-33:    1.) 35(x)-15
----------------Progression 2x------------------------
2.) 18(win)+30
----------------------------------------------------------------
+15
==============================
...18 (newest spin-value)

Bet L4-9, L16-21, L28-33:    1.) 18(win)+15

[Proofreaders2000]

BetVoyager RNG has a Fun Money Mode
*Often regarded as "The only trustworthy RNG Casino online"

Test: RichBailey86's Three-Double Streets System @ BetVoyager
RNG European Wheel-Thursday, October 2,2014 @ 10:41pm CDT USA

...7 (newest spin-value)

Bet L4-9, L16-21, L28-33:    1.) 20(win)+15
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...20 (newest spin-value)

Bet L4-9, L16-21, L28-33:    1.) 21(win)+15
---------------------------------------------------------------------
+30

[Chris555p]

- Rich

No need to bet on zero as it will reduce your ROI. Just ignore it, accept the
occasional loss and move on.

If u read thoroughly the thread of JL on phase 3 and the thread on MMIP about 95% of the
answers are in it.

[Chris555p]

- Uglybob

If u test it as u did any system will fail. As I said before I have been playing 3
double street for years with excellent results.

I have never played more than 100 spins in a row. I'm not greedy I only try
to make 10%per day, then move on.

Do same test with 100 spins max u will get an entirely different picture.

The longer u stay at the table, the more likely  u will loose.

[falkor]

I'm getting some interesting results here after 1,000,000 casino spins:
High vs. Low = 17/16 max in a row
3 double streets (1,middle,6) = 19/21 max in a row

I am now running a test for the 3 middle double streets as recommended in this topic!

[eddy35]

A few years ago I did some testing playing 3 DS. I played them with an individual progression using :

Bet......win
amt
1.........05
1.........04
1.........03
2.........07
2.........05
3.........08
4.........10
5.........11
6.........11
7.........10
9.........13
11........14
14........18
18........24
22........26
27........29
31........22
37........21
45........24
55........29
67........34
82........42
97........35
115.......28
136.......18
164.......22
200.......38
240.......38

My twist was lowering the bets by deviding the them by 3 .............  So if I had to play 18, 2 and 1 units on the DS......... I played 3X7 units. This way you are able to controle the progression.
When on a new high restart the systen and start with 3X1 unit again.
During a session you can also lower the bets if a smaller profit is needed to reach a new high.

[RouletteGhost]

Proofreader on your testing what progression were you using

Try.up 1 chip on a loss down 1 chip on a win $5 on each DS for a total bet of 15 to start

Or since the hits come much quicker then other EC try fibonacci or dare I say martingale

A conservative fibo may be perfect

And to think of it the hollandish progression  may be really good for this!

[Proofreaders2000]

Proofreader on your testing what progression were you using

Try.up 1 chip on a loss down 1 chip on a win $5 on each DS for a total bet of 15 to start

Or since the hits come much quicker then other EC try fibonacci or dare I say martingale

A conservative fibo may be perfect

And to think of it the hollandish progression  may be really good for this!

I was using 1,2,3,5,8 (stop) progression. (from the Star System)

*Goal was two wins per session.

Honestly I think you only need a 1,2,4 (stop) progression, then start over at one unit.
You could even have one virtual loss as the trigger.

[RouletteGhost]

Good job

Yes I would wait for one virtual loss before beginning

Tonight I will play around with this with hollandish progression

[Proofreaders2000]

The hit rate is good enough for a positive progression.

+1 unit every two consecutive wins. Less two units on a loss.

[falkor]

I'm getting some interesting results here after 1,000,000 casino spins:
High vs. Low = 17/16 max in a row
3 double streets (1,middle,6) = 19/21 max in a row

I am now running a test for the 3 middle double streets as recommended in this topic!

Nah, I'm getting 19/17 on those 3 middle double streets, so there's no real fluctuation between traditional ECs and the 3 middle DSs.

[muggins]

Just finished running 50 x 100 real spin sessions from Spielbank Wiesbaden T2 2003, using flat betting.   I picked 100 spins at random from the 68000+ spins I had in the file.  End result was -116, but there were many 0 or + results, enough to think a mild +1-1 progression might work with this. 

I limited each session to 100 spins.  Many of the -ve results after 100 spins had a +ve positions during the sessions, so stopping on a +ve would be worth thinking about.

here is an example of a flat and +1-1 progression on the same 100 spins:

Flat betting:



Progression:



Admittedly both were +ve results.

Here is one that had a -ve result flat betting:



and then the progression result for the same 100 spins:





Results are attached in spreadsheet.

[RouletteGhost]

Thanks muggins

This is what im saying

The hit rate is there so a progression is safe, unlike the other ECs

[muggins]

Just from the testing I have done so far, not extensive, I think flat betting with a small win target and a good stop loss would be the best way.  Almost every session I tested had a +ve high at one time during the 100 spins, mostly within the first 20-50 spins.

[RouletteGhost]

Muggins,

Hollandish progression on 3 middle double streets OR star progression