foolproof progression

[RouletteGhost]

bringing it back alive

here is the link, you can download the PDF

link:s://:.dropbox.com/s/zmwixa1giyo9rsm/Stetson%20Bailey.pdf

starts on page 33 goes to page 49 with variation starting on page 44

good progressions here my fellow roulette players

[falkor]

I'll test it out next

[falkor]

Seems an impressive system!

I tested over 100 sessions (see attached) and I cheated by continuing the session directly on from the previous (the system is either unaffected by this or works better in the long run). I think it lost £1000 in one of the first sessions, but others made TENS of thousands!

[falkor]

Next test will be @ 100 steps instead of 1000, and to find the average profit per session. We can then set a stop win.

[RouletteGhost]

Foolproof is a few different progressions. Try em all. Starting on page 30ish

[falkor]

Ok, well for this one @ 100 steps:

max = 1996
avg = 349

So stop win should be either 349 or 175?

[falkor]

Unfortunately the system failed every kind of test I attempted over multiple sessions:
Stop win/stop loss on/off, 349/165/1/20/100 100 steps, 2000 steps - you name it I tried to make it work to no avail.

[iggiv]

no progression can  help u winning my friends

[falkor]

no progression can  help u winning my friends

What can? Please enlighten us! 

[Chris555p]

Only high quality bet  selection.....; No mickey mouse system.......

[RouletteGhost]

Different foolproof variations.

1) increase 1 unit every bet win or lose

2) increase 1 unit on a loss then decrease 1 unit in a win and stay at that level until a loss

3) with $5 units +5 on a loss -4 on a win

And I think theres a couple more in that pdf

With proper bankroll these progression should overcome 50/50 bets. May even be better for baccarat

[iggiv]

Chris already did. As me (many times).

What can? Please enlighten us! 

[falkor]

Does that mean you always flat bet then?

[iggiv]

yep

[iggiv]

link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution

link:s://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Normal_Distribution_PDF.svg/525px-Normal_Distribution_PDF.svg.png

this means that if you hope to compensate sleeping numbers by betting on them more you will finally pay everything back because of numbers that will sleep longer though less frequently. But that will be more than enough for you to lose.  And house edge makes it even worse. That's a road to nowhere, it's already been tested many times.