Some ideas on table layout betting. (Subject modified)

[RouletteGhost]

Falkor  is a smart man. Maybe he has a mental block on posting the gameplay strategy

[SamNL]

Sorry thelaw but I really don't agree with you here.

It's your opinion but I don't see it the same way as you do.

The way I see it is that Falkor is doing some great work for all of us.

Yesterday Falkor said it himself that it would take around 2 weeks before everything is tested and we are out of the testing phase. Then we can all get some clear rules on how to do this because then everything has been tested thoroughly and then we can all start playing.
Extensive testing takes time and effort.

The way I see it is that Falkor is still moving things forward and we just have to wait for all the testing to be done.

[falkor]

I never bashed winkel per se, but simply exposed his contradictions and evil exploits, which is far more abusive than any bashing or name calling. Most peeps can't see what winkel was doing in that GUT thread, but I can: he got people to post their data and then changed the rules each time so that the set won, and then blamed the member for not following the rules correctly, thereby belittling him/her in the process.

I am one of the few good guys and truly honest men you will meet. I have not deceived anyone in this thread, but I cannot keep explaining the basics every page, though they have been explained plenty of times throughout the topic - even before I joined it. I'm now attempting to close 6 DSs instead of the original 4/5. I don't bet at all when 4+ opens unless one of them has repeated, but CBW and warrior may have carried on betting 3 DSs. Apart from that I have been working on a set of rules for when to end set or "enter watch mode" (as I call it) at the check-points where the first 4 DSs close - regardless of whether there has been a win up until that point; the diagram I posted twice shows the chaotic stage where a DS can close, but we may not hit them.

Cheers for the support and constructive criticism - it's all welcome! 

Thanks to Still for tracing the history of this system back to Hermes prior to warrior's insights! I'm very interested in anything to do with this idea/concept, which is why I wasted money on CBW.

What Warrior suggested were not rules, but a place to start thinking about roulette differently, and what was suggested was not claimed to be the winning formula, which Warrior was reserving to himself.  How to start thinking of roulette differently? Bet on each DS as it shows, and stop betting on it when it shows again. Pocket the repeats.  That's it.  And that's basically what Hermes contributed over 4.5 years ago. Everything beyond that has been contributed by falkor, unless somebody else said something and i missed it. 

Well said - that sums it up nicely!

[RFMAXX]

i do also think, then when all tests are done and falkor sets the rules, his system is far beyond warriors and we have to choose an new name 

and i want to test it with my killer perms from duisburg casino. every posted system before cant stand these perms.

[wiggy]

and i want to test it with my killer perms from duisburg casino. every posted system before cant stand these perms.

RFMAXX, do you have these perms in a file. I think a lot of us would be interested in testing our strategies against those spins.

Thanks in advance.

[SamNL]

i do also think, then when all tests are done and falkor sets the rules, his system is far beyond warriors and we have to choose an new name 

That's what I'm thinking too.

[falkor]

I do like the way this idea/system is evolving. It's now more simple and precise, and less about remembering progressions and when to enter watch mode, but more about knowing when to "buffer" in the next open DS for continued play of a set beyond 1 or 2 wins. The science of chaos is really starting to reveal itself in the latest test results - my predictions were totally wrong, and it's about letting the data speak for itself without becoming deluded. Hermes quotes the New World Order as order out of chaos. Whatever happened to that guy anyway? (no activity since 2012)

[winkel]

i do also think, then when all tests are done and falkor sets the rules,

But he is not testing at all. He got spins and forms out of them statistics and believes they will hold for ever and eternity? He doesn´t know that much about roulette, to know that this is only referring to the past and you can´t built rules out of that past.

Look at that nice post he did: 8 open lines hit 32 times. Of course thats a lot. But the other four have had hit 21 times. Does that make any sense? NO! it is the known hitrate of 24 numbers against the odds of 12 numbers.

That ds2 has closed after spin 7 and than followed something impressive is nice but not worth a dime.

He doesn´t accept the GUT-Rule: Watch what is going on. He doesnt see that if I got 2 Double-Streets hitting back to back 8 times in 37 spins is something different to them hitting every 4th or 5th spins. It is both a hitrate of 8 out of 37.
And how can he say that these 8 backtoback won´t hit again?

Does he has any idea of that statistic telling only 15 numbers in 37 spins and 32 numbers in 37 spins?
How could this be combined and fitted to a set of rules? Not talking about the mess that could happen in between those variances.

[winkel]

I do like the way this idea/system is evolving.
I think it is revolving

It's now more simple and precise, and less about remembering progressions and when to enter watch mode, but more about knowing when to "buffer" in the next open DS for continued play of a set beyond 1 or 2 wins.

here we are at the beginning: "I know which DS hits next"  All that testing and bookmaking for the bin? What a shame

The science of chaos Is thee such a sciences? is really starting to reveal itself that means chaos is chaotic? in the latest test results - my predictions were totally wrong he´s got it at last, and it's about letting the data speak for itself without becoming deluded. Hermes quotes the New World Order as order out of chaos. Whatever happened to that guy anyway? (no activity since 2012)

Never read such a brilliant confused thread. 

[falkor]

Not since your challenge - since the latest (surprising) test results.

I'm not sure how I would go about communicating my tests to you? They are based on the basic rules discussed in this topic (DSs that open, close, repeat) with the additional rules I mentioned on the previous page re: when to end set based on a DS closing. I can send you the 1 million spins I use from the roulette training site; that's no problem. You could easily code the same thing as what I did given the latest rules. But all this testing is pretty much coming to an end now. I just have DS 3 and DS 4 rules to implement then we need to learn a few progressions. So about another 2 weeks max, say, New Years Day...

[RFMAXX]

there was a poll already...the majority wanted this thread open.
please all calm down and let falkor do his research.
he dont want to sell us sth and he did all tests by himself.
no one lost money or time...only falkor.
so let us wait till he finished his research. i want so see what he finds out.

[falkor]

You an agent or something? You've still got till New Years Day to win a bit more from casinos before I announce this system as complete and chart 1 million spins. I know you would like this topic deleted, but others deserve opportunities to win too. You need to divvy up the dollar and stop being greedy!

[RFMAXX]

i do sometimes think the same:

they see the potential in this system and dont want that members from this forum spread it in the world
and steal their casino money

[bbb128]

 

[falkor]

THIS EVEN IF YOU COME UP WITH RULES WILL NOT STAND THE FIRST 1000 SPINS.

Will you promise to eat glass if it does pass?