System based on the PCWB (V.8)

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=14649.15

See post #29 with the atached files.
Aim for +/- 300 units per session.
You lose when you lose the progression which is also 300 units.
Very profitable.

[Dane]

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=14649.15

See post #29 with the atached files.
Aim for +/- 300 units per session.
You lose when you lose the progression which is also 300 units.
Very profitable.

Very profitable for how long?
Progressions usually don´t pass the test of time.
                                                                       MASSE
                                                                       Ã‰GALE (flat betting)
ought to be sufficent if your bet selection  is superiour.

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

For almost 4000 spins...
And why flatbetting?
You will never come in the profit zone if you are going to flat bet.

[Turner]

And why flatbetting?
You will never come in the profit zone if you are going to flat bet.

You will if your bet selection is good.
It's the bet selection that has to be strong....Not the progression needed to bail out the poor bet selection
If your progression happens to bail you out...you are still stuck with a poor BS
And it won't bail you out for ever
The truth will out.
And that is that you have a poor BS
Just my view for what it's worth

[ddarko]

You will if your bet selection is good.
It's the bet selection that has to be strong....Not the progression needed to bail out the poor bet selection
If your progression happens to bail you out...you are still stuck with a poor BS
And it won't bail you out for ever
The truth will out.

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

Oké then another approach,

These are the stats from the file.
I have tested it over around 4000 real spins from Dublinbet.

Total Loss = 1419

Total losses in a row:

1x = 647
2x = 220
3x = 63        930
----------------
4x = 15
5x = 4
6x = 7
7x = 3          29

Flat bet and it would fail.
However if we use a progression for example (1-3-9 = 156 units) and we wait for a first loss as a trigger.
Then we would win:

(930x6=5580)  -  (29x156 = 4524) = 1056 units!

Other progressions might even work better.

So what do you think now?

[gorki]

"However if we use a progression for example (1-3-9 = 156 units) and we wait for a first loss as a trigger.
Then we would win:
(930x6=5580)  -  (29x156 = 4524) = 1056 units!
Other progressions might even work better"

0?

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

It was just an example.

If my calculations are right then the progression 1-6-18 makes a profit of 5370 units.

Its a 24 number split bet.
You bet 12 splits and win 6 units.

[RouletteKnight]

You will if your bet selection is good.
It's the bet selection that has to be strong....Not the progression needed to bail out the poor bet selection
If your progression happens to bail you out...you are still stuck with a poor BS
And it won't bail you out for ever
The truth will out.
And that is that you have a poor BS
Just my view for what it's worth

A light progression is good..I believe better than flat bet. When it fails you dip by a little only, but you made the most of of your profits already.

[SamNL]

Hey CocaVillaLaNoche,

Any updates on this?

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

If you look at the spreadsheet (results)

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=14649.15

Track the two systems and bet when for example 1 system has 3 losses go for the win. Or when you see 4 wins go for the loss which is only one sector 6 units.