Looking for this thread.

[Azim]

I don't want to take ownership of this, if no one comes forward as to whose thread it was.

I had read about it sometime last year this time. There is basically no tracking required.

The thread owner, suggested a bet selection of  repeating : Winning number, add 1 and subtract 1 to the winning number and bet 3 numbers.

I took on a project were I was stuck trying to get baccarat results from an online casino.

I needed something to do my test with. I wrote this and instead of using 3 number's I went on to use 5 number's.

Which was winning number and upto -2 and + 2 of the winning number.  The results were awesome.

I could not believe what I saw. For those that have time in their hands, try it out and see it for yourself.

No rule changes.  Simple  if the winning number is 0 bet 35, 36, 0, 1 and 2
If the winning number is 13 bet 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.

It's simple no tracking. I will leave money management to your own individual playing style.

[nottophammer]

Azim
Its a nice  idea, simple to do. Just like a member said if you play 37 spins, and first bet is on 1 next 2 and so on, well thats darft members will say,but i've seen where when tracking a method,lets say the 15th numberof the mat has gone,so your now looking for any of the remaining 22 and low and behold number 16 drops in,coincidence i suppose.

[nottophammer]

Nice and simple Azim.

Heres thurs 31/7/14
the last 185 spins on their stats shows 6 zero's. These numbers from testimg somthing in notepad aug 9th.

27  so we bet  25,26,27,28,29. well bless my cotton socks a win straight away.
28
15
7
30
34
31
3
6
31

6
30
12
12  win
7
19
28 jason finish
13 angela now
19
0

33
12
33
8
9 win
33
23
18
34
29

1
24
12
2
8
8 jason back  another win
30
0
6
13

18
17 another win
2
12
18
27
26 another win
34
8
33

18
4 angela back
22
3
11
20
15
10
30
36

well 5 hits

[Azim]

Must have been me, as usual being lucky.

[nottophammer]

THE 5 WINS ARE ON THE MAT, IF PLAY THE SAME ON WHEEL LAYOUT, 7 WINS, bit  like something ghost suggested,

[Normy2000]

If you were not playing from spin 1100 to 1200, it look good.
This was tested with a standard 40 steps progression for 5 numbers.
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 22, 26, 30, 35, 40, 47, 54, 63, 73, 85, 99, 115, 133, 155, 180, 209]

Let me lnow if you want the Rx file.

Cheers

[nottophammer]

cheers Normy
that balance looks good, for something so simple to do. the spins in the reply have more wins if played to the wheel layout Normy, would you be able to test that way, as know rx knowledge what so ever

[Normy2000]

First idea is allways the best...

[iggiv]

Azim, maybe it was this guy

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=profile;u=1045

[Azim]

Azim, maybe it was this guy

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=profile;u=1045

Could be, it was an old thread so never know.

[denzie]

sounds easy ... i will test it.