• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Evens Eclipse

Started by buffalowizard, Dec 15, 07:26 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

buffalowizard

Yes, until  a win , a loss, or a new trigger bet (double EC)   Look at the samples in the thread

Tomla021

This is a pretty darn good bet--I tested  100 ,+1-1  on High low , even odd and ended up plus 37 with no sweat or big down turns
"No Whining, just Winning"

GLC

Big A gave me an idea.  Play H E, H O and L E, L O with a 1-1 flat bet but keep track of R E, R O and  B E, B O.  Anytime you get R E or B O as a trigger, bet 2-2 on B E or R O whichever is appropriate.  This gives you a 10 to 8 chance to win vs a 9 to 9 chance.  Early testing looks pretty good.  Could this be the sought after way to capitalize on the uneven distribution of Even and Odds with Red and Black? :o :o :o

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

agesta

Quote from: GLC on Jun 23, 12:09 AM 2015
Big A gave me an idea.  Play H E, H O and L E, L O with a 1-1 flat bet but keep track of R E, R O and  B E, B O.  Anytime you get R E or B O as a trigger, bet 2-2 on B E or R O whichever is appropriate.  This gives you a 10 to 8 chance to win vs a 9 to 9 chance.  Early testing looks pretty good.  Could this be the sought after way to capitalize on the uneven distribution of Even and Odds with Red and Black? :o :o :o

GLC
Hi GLC!
Please show  us how you play it with a small session!
Thank`s Agesta

atlantis

Thanks George - it is interesting idea... :)

I tried a session betting as you described thru RX software attached.

100 spins = +32u !

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

atlantis

Whoo! An incredible +84 units profit on next test!!!   :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:
(real numbers)
 
Some wonderful back to back double-win runs happened.

Like before if 0 occurred I simply repeated the last bet.

Used GLC rule: Betting 1-1 on last h/l and o/e EC's unless r/o or b/e in which case 2-2 on those instead!
Great idea, George.
Plenty of opportunities to cut and run with £££ profits!  :twisted:

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

atlantis

Third session...

This time result over 100 spins =  -32units.   :-\

Bad result -maybe not so unexpected... Of course, I may not be playing it the way GLC intended?

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

atlantis

Last session.
100 spins = +8u

Maybe we could incorporate GLC idea of betting r/o and b/e into BW's methodology somehow??

A.

Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

Tomla021

this is a good way of betting --im not clear on GLC version
"No Whining, just Winning"

GLC

Atlantis,  All I'm suggesting is that if we have a winning system betting BW's basic idea, if we just keep an eye on R and B with E and O and if we see a repeat of RE or BO, then we have 10 chances for a double win instead of 9 chances with every other combination.

You could think of it this way.  We can just create a flat bet system within BWs system in which we play BWs sytem until we get two REs or BOs in a row and then we bet for the RO or BE whichever is appropriate.  Since there are 8 REs and BOs, and 10 ROs and BEs, we have 10 chances for a double win.  Whereas every other trigger it's 9 to 9.

Play just like BW laid it out in original post.  But emphasize the 10 to 8 imbalance of RE and BO vs RO and BE.

I'm not trying to change anything in the original system.

Is it a long term winner?? ???

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

I just can't think of a reason why if we play HE, HO, LE and LO and have a winning system, then throwing a bet sequence after a double RE or BO gives us what seems to me to be a little edge for a double win.  If we break even a few spins and then get another trigger, then we stop playing for the win on BE, RO until we get another RE or BO trigger.

Is my "focus factor" letting me down or am I seeing this right?
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

One more shot at explaining why I think this should work.  This system (that is BW's system) is based on a trigger of a combination of High with Odd or Even and Low with Odd or Even.  There are 9 numbers for each combination so a trigger is satisfied when one of the other 9 numbers shows before another trigger happens.

There are only 8 numbers that are Red and Even and 10 numbers that are Red and Odd.  With Black, there are 8 numbers that are Black and Odd and 10 numbers that are Black and Even.  So, if we get a Red and Even trigger, the trigger is harder to develop because we only have 8 instead of 9 numbers the form this trigger.  Since we win when we have a Red and Odd number hit before we get another Red and Even number and we have 10 Red and Odd numbers, we should have just a slight advantage over playing High with Odd or Even against Low wit Odd or Even.

This may be erroneous logic but it seems accurate if the system works using triggers made up of 9 numbers with a winner made by 9 numbers. 
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Tomla021

the more i test this the more i like it......thanks GLC for the explanation
"No Whining, just Winning"

Tomla021

if any one could post some spins using glc 'idea it would be much appreciated ,,,, I think I get it but to visualize it would help
"No Whining, just Winning"

GLC

21,  Sorry, I've been off line for a couple of days.  I'll post an example later tonight or tomorrow.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

-