Simple yet effective DS tactic

[Chris555p]

Don't want to sound too negative but this system is very similar to our friend JL Phase 3;
and at the end of the day, guest what.....?? Refer to JL link for more info.

[Rewster88]

Chris,

I think at the end all systems end up the same, think we are all thinking to hard. Maybe we need to focus more on the money management or vb or ds. I must be honest to myself that i just gave up a little hope on the roulette. The thing is every time pops someone up and tells another promissing thing that blows new hope, false hope. I lately just bet 12 to 16 numbers hit and run. Sounds crazy but in the end it works the same as any other system.

R

[RouletteGhost]

if a system has a good hit rate by the time it busts u should still be positive

[buffalowizard]

Here's is the link to Phase 3 for other DS nuts out there!
My method is less of a grind in terms of waiting for specific qualifiers but each has their own merits, just like Rewster says.
We each make of a system what we can.
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6477.0

[Chris555p]

@Rewster - I totally agree with u; I consider that sound money management and discipline
is even more important than the bet selection itself.

@ RG I agree as long as the system doesn't blow in ur face on the very first bet and
progression..... 

[RouletteGhost]

Carsch progression needs 2 wins in a row within 12 spins

Therefore use a 1 row loss as a qualifier then begin the system and it will be solid

[nowun]

Unfortunately the users on here give up too soon on systems and bets that look like they lose.  There are some really reliable methods on here.  This looks like another one that needs to be persevered with

[denzie]

Correct Nowun. Every system burst soon or late. But that dusnt mean it ain't working. And this one right here.....works just fine. I still use +1/-1 and if i would get to far behind i would go +2/-2 etc...but till now it not got that far.

[bleep24]

Hi everyone,

Played live WH last night.    78 spins  - 15 no triggers/31wins/32losses so if flat betting you would have lost -3.    1 x 6 chain came out.  Playing +l/-1 would have made 90 units.  Highest drawdown was just over 100 units.    I was playing 111 222 333     Two ways to play this I think - play blindly 111 then 222 then 333 etc. calculating where you are at bank wise and if at a new high re-set. Also only move up after 3 losses at that level and again recalculate where you are all the time bank wise.   I have also calculated what if you used 5 steps instead of 3.
These ways all came out winning about the same:   about 20 units  but it was mainly all down to one good burst of win outcomes so as you can see 3l wins/32 losses = 50/50 (average) will result in a profit.   The first 20 spins of the session was 13 losses and 7 wins including that 6x loser.   So on this sample +1/-! would have come out winning 90 units (not to be sniffed at) proving yet again that +1/-1 is a pretty powerful progression if you stick with it and will not cause the same palpitations as a Marty!!!

[denzie]

So the +1/-1 made 90units. And the 111 222 333 made 20units?

[buffalowizard]

Bleep,
When you say x6 chain, do you mean that you lost 2 rows of 3? How much did you win last night then?

[Chris555p]

I tested extensively all sorts of even money bets including playing 3 ds such as the ones
mentioned above. I also tested playing 24 nos such as 2 dozens or 4 ds. It is clear that based on extensive
testing results that playing 24 nos or 4 ds is much more profitable. As long as a soft progression is used
then, it beats playing 3 ds anytime, anyday.....

[RouletteGhost]

Carsch progression needs 2 EC bet wins back to back within 12 spins. Not bad

[nottophammer]

So bleep (Brian) played last night. Part of reply 68 he gives you the answer, These ways all came out winning about the same:   about 20 units .
Nowun's reply 30  shows bleep is correct, +27 2nd bet, so should one take 20 or as near to 20 units and start again

[bleep24]

Hi  Buffalowizard,

Yes, a loss of 3x - retrack then another loss of 3x.  With E/C`s (Which this basically is) it does not really matter whether you bet same or different 50/50 will get roughly same result.  Yes I believe we should persevere with this, trying various progressions.  As I have said earlier, if we win  say 8/10 sessions then you`re making money.   Various progressions will work sometimes, not others as we all well know.   I was playing real money last night playing 111 222 333 etc.  Wait for 3 losses at a level (LLWL - now move up to 222 check BR to decide whether to move up again or down.  I think that this is just one way of playing this.  It could be 1111 2222 3333 or 11111 22222 33333.  Each to their own.  Each member should try the progression they favour and decide what is best.   Playing double dozens is profitable for a while then the inevitable happens, even with a soft progression: I have tried it.   I like +1/-! progression: it works for me. BTW I made 21 units last night playing 111 222 333   lost loads on first 20 spins but then recovered.   I do not know when or like to quit.