Leveller progression by hermes

[TwoCatSam]

Tomorrow I shall play "A Method With Teeth" by Mr J. and one with no name by Dane.  I'll let you know.

Possibly some "Tic Tac Toe" and another with no name by Mr J.

They are all based on luck...

Sam

[amk]

Love your last 2 posts 2Cat, makes me think.


Perhaps 80% of all methods pass x amount of spins on their first test run?

Perhaps in the short term there is an accumulative advantage that keeps adding up?

For example, if ignatus added up all his accumulated wins for the first test he ran for each method he selected he might be in the plus?

I think being tactical about how you play the first and only time you play a method might be successful longterm?

By this I mean playing methods with a not to high progression sequence (or flat betting) and stopping when you win x amount after x amount of spins or losing so much after x amount of spins while still being ahead etc...

In essence, either the majority of methods played once will win or the majority of methods played once will lose.


A simple example,

First method:
bet against HHH landing, a 3 step progression of 7 units.

play for 8 wins or a loss before this point. If you pass 8 wins keep playing until you lose, then stop playing the method.

This is just a simple example, the same concept applies for more intricate methods.


Perhaps in the short term methods will perform above expectation, we know that in the longterm they will not....

[TwoCatSam]

Perhaps in the short term methods will perform above expectation, we know that in the long term they will not....

AMK

Perhaps what we need to do is link all the short terms together to make a patch-work long term.

Sam

[denzie]

@Mongool..... it's very clear how i play. And about Hermes 4x4. ..try it. I've played it b4 but it's not my cup of tea.  It did inspired me though. And yes , they will not go in debat with older and respected members. If nobody answers. ..just try yourself. .....

And the other....wait for a dozen to come 3x in a row...then bet 1-1 on the other 2 dozen.  Win ? Reset. Lose? Wait for next trigger and bet 2-2......3-3....4-4.....5-5....etc

[agesta]

Hi!
A year ago or so i did a test with different systems, i played them 3 times each  if i remember, along with the discussions here i thought i will do a new test now with our great contributer proofreeders systems, so i have played the 20 first systems of his.
I played them for just one session win or lose.
14 wins
6 losses
+108 units
This would be 10,8 euros

I will do the rest of the systems to and see what happens and see if we can benifit something out of it.

agesta

[agesta]

Hi!
A year ago or so i did a test with different systems, i played them 3 times each  if i remember, along with the discussions here i thought i will do a new test now with our great contributer proofreeders systems, so i have played the 20 first systems of his.
I played them for just one session win or lose.
14 wins
6 losses
+108 units
This would be 10,8 euros

I will do the rest of the systems to and see what happens and see if we can benifit something out of it.

agesta

Ok here comes the result after 21 more systems of proofreaders.
The same rules like yesterday.
14 wins
7 loss =+102 units= 10.2 euros
Total:28 wins and 13 lost games
+210 units
I will keep on testing and now i will test just the systems that won and so on until i have a Winner.
But i Think anyway that you need  a lots of systems in your bag to be a Winner and have the guts to stop playing a system maybe just after the first loss and move on.
By the way, i played the systems from the first to the 
last.


agesta

[TwoCatSam]

Really would help if you would type outside the quotes.

Type type type.....

Or not............

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

x

[RouletteGhost]

Agesta you went through proofs systems and bet each one once then went to the next?

[amk]

Awesome stuff agesta!!

I like your idea of playing the 28 winners again and then the winners of those 28 again etc!

1) It seems that your losing seasons are not too bad in total units lost?

2) You are playing until the method loses once?

3) I assume the methods you select do not have a high progression? Could you describe the methods you find meet the criteria?


You could play a lot more methods before you start playing the winners again (2nd round). I would not be surprised if the second time around playing the winning methods again will reveal a same win to loss ration as seen with 14/6 test of 20 methods and 14/7 of 21 methods.... but you can only do this for so long, for example until you have 4 winning methods remaining (?3rd round)

There should be hundreds of methods to play that fit a certain criteria, or perhaps just keep creating your own new method played once or just tweak an old method you already played once? just brainstorming


To answer your question 2Cat! yes, perhaps the longterm is a patchwork of shortterm winning methods. This strategy can be applied in many different parameters. I like what agesta is doin!!

[Derp]

I think we can classify this as event betting... you calculate the odds of a "socalled" event to happen and play against it.... same with me playing inside numbers... i use event betting when i play online casinos to clear the bonuses... i bet and get a head a few hundred bucks then i play the terminator two slotmachines to clear the bonus faster..... takes me around 3 days to clear a bonus this way and ive only busted once.

It aint making me rich but everymoth all of my 3 online casinos offer me a reload (100%-200%) bonus and i start over

[agesta]

Hi!
2 cat i am sorry just pressed the wrong thing on the computer!
AMK
I have played every system once just the way they are described, win or lose.
No they do not have a high progression, because of the way i  play them.
I get back later on the other stuff and how i am going to proced with this Project.

agesta

[TwoCatSam]

How many systems are there?

[agesta]

About 40 system!

agesta