• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

24 Number Anomaly

Started by RouletteGhost, Apr 04, 09:11 PM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

Today I have been testing various things....found a 24 number anomaly....

i have looked at 200 past spins and have spent 30 minutes on a live wheel

so far i have not seen more than 3 losses in a row.....so i believe it is a good bet selection

for now i am flat betting until i am CERTAIN max loss in a row is 3, then i will feel safe using progression

the numbers are strategically placed on the wheel in clumps of 2 with 1 number in between

The bet selection:
0 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 16 19 20 22 25 29 30 32 33 34 35 36

as of now this is just an abstract to test....

since it is 24 numbers it can be treated as betting 2 dozens
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

1 hour into auto rebet i have seen a max of 5 losses in a row which happened twice

Trigger is 1 virtual loss
Progression +1/-1 seems safe. Need to use some sort of negative progression since it is a 2 dozen bet
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Can be played as splits so only 12 chips are laid instead of 24
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Proofreaders2000

Ok sounds good so far.  If it it has a good hit-rate
as you suggest, it would be close to a grail in a bot:)

RouletteGhost

Set this on auto spin on celtic for 4 hours. Using $5 units i was down $200. Which is pretty amazing flat betting considering to profit flat betting youd need to win 3 out of 4 spins. So just about breaking even isnt too shabby.

I believe it is safe for a mild progression
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

bckwrds

You can use splits to drop it down to 14u or put 1/2u on 4 numbers to get 12u total bet.

denzie

RG where you find the time to play all these systems and  find new ones every day? Your the king of multitasking.
my head would explode if i play 10 different progressions on 10 different systems.

You must be making a ton of money. Spend it well. Its time you get yourself a bot and move to Bora Bora . lol
As spins roll off our predictions get better

RouletteGhost

Just using fun money for now. Im testing a lot. Trying to wrap my head around life of brian. And im testing your double dozen thing.

But this right here i promise u is solid

Auto bet for FOUR HOURS and was just about right where I started flat betting. So +1/-1 we are talking big profits. At one point it was up $500
that is amazing results flat betting
Proof this is a good bet selection since u need 3 wins to 1 loss to profit
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

ego


It looks like a very expensive bet - i mean in a real casino the minimum might be 2.5 Euro for a straight number - so 24 x 2.5 = 60 Euro
That means you need a very big bankroll and it get worst if you going to use a progression upon that - then you would need around 2 to 4K.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

RouletteGhost

Was using $5 chips last night straight up

After 4 hours of continuous auto rebet i was down $200 with flat betting. Which to me is impressive considering u need 3 wins to 1 loss to profit

There was a few 5 losses in a row that hurt

Its a good bet selection. Even with the draw downs flat betting recovered

To flat bet a double dozen bet without changing chip placement and having no more than 5 losses in a row is impressive

If i continue to test and its this good i plan to use $1 chips at local casino with a +1/-1

If ur forced to play 2.5 per number then yes its expensive. But with a trigger of 2 virtual losses not so bad
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Chris555p

Testing a system for only 4 hrs means nothing.....lol lol
To reach a conclusion as to whether a system is good it must be tested for at least
1,000 betting opportunities for a lot of hrs and if after that time u are still ahead with
very small draw down then only u can conclude u have something good for short term......

Anything else is just pure luck at the time.....lol lol

RouletteGhost

maybe it is luck, maybe it isnt

i  looked at a few hundred past live spins AND played for 4 hours continuously

fact is i havent seen more than 5 losses in a row, that means more than 5 losses in a row COULD be a rare event

a +1/-1 is a safe progression for this since the hits are so frequent

i mean come on lets be honest here, 4 hours of flat betting on a bet that requires 3 wins to 1 loss to profit and i was just about even after 4 hours means it is a good bet selection. and the bet selection comes from the wheel layout

also i dont claim it is a solid foolproof method....i posted it in the testing zone so if people WANT to test it they can

so far it is very solid
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Chris555p

4 hrs testing is extremely short time in roulette; therefore, it can be concluded as being pure luck
nothing more.......

RouletteGhost

Quote from: Chris555p on Apr 05, 12:20 PM 2015
4 hrs testing is extremely short time in roulette; therefore, it can be concluded as being pure luck
nothing more.......

could very well be

but with such a good bet selection i wont sit at a table for 1000 spins, ill make my unit goal and leave
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Chris555p

Naan, this is not a good bet selection at all; Unless u have a br like the queen of England
u are just wasting ur time and energy with these sort of mickey mouse methods that only
work with fun money at home behind the keyboard........lol lol

-