dozen system from page 84...this ones for denzie

[RouletteGhost]

Not my method. On page 84 of main roulette board. Looks good to me. Sounds good to me.

Ill call it the denzie special

My fellow members, I think we must all test this system.
I have tested so far a lot of spins and it is still UP.

His system is.

Trigger :wait for a dozen to sleep 4 times.
When we have this trigger we bet 3 times on the sleeping dozen  with the according progression   1,1,2

If it wins we are reseting again to 1 chip and we are waiting for the next trigger.

If we will lose,we stop betting this trigger(sleeping dozen) and we are waiting untill this dozen will hit and we are finding the next TRIGGER.
Then we are also betting 3 times but with progression  3.4.6
If we will win,we are UP and we are reseting for the next trigger to 1 chip again.

If we will lose then we are doing the same as above,but with progression 6,14,21.
This is it.
BR needed = 51 chips

I know that spliting the progression doesn t change anything!
But He claims that he has lost only 1 time in 2 years(and he is playing everyday)
and 2nd my tests are very good....I haven t lost yet.

[TwoCatSam]

A dozen sleeping four spins is about as rare as Oklahoma wind.

[denzie]

@RG...talk to nick. He can write a sheet and run the bot. It might be worth it 

[buffalowizard]

An oldie but a Goodie!

[RouletteGhost]

I dont know how to use a bot

[denzie]

ive tested this with the help of Alex...btw big thx my friend.

it didnt did very good. it goes more down then up with at the finishline a big cry.
better we forget about this.
or use a trigger of 2-3 vl

grts denzie

[denzie]

RG do you still play this ?

[bleep24]

SEX  AND THE HG!

Which caught your eye?  I bet it was the HG       Hahahaha
Well this post is a long time dead but as I have posted previously, there are some nuggets amongst old posts and I believe this one betting on a single dozen is on of them.  In nearly   one week of `dry` testing on  Wm. Hill live it has never lost  once.    This is a task for Mogul397 as he is able to find RFH`s where none exist.  Over to you Mogul that is if you have not given up hope of finding a winning system and taken a job at KFC or Subway.

In the orginal post it was said this system had not lost in 2 years.  How was it over-looked: disbelief perhaps?

Regards,    Brian

[RouletteGhost]

Thanks for reviving this.

Ill be back to the drawing boards soon

Ive been on a roulette testing hiatus

Mainly because im sick of seeing the general here. But ill be back at it soon

[bleep24]

BTW.  I was only waiting for 1v number to come out after 3 attempt loss.  Using prog.  1  1  2      3  4   6      6   14   21   Only went into 3rd level a few times and usually when `0` was involved.

There is somewhere a 65 step progression for single dozens.  I cannot find it but I do well remember it.  It may be by the same person that put out 59 step prog. for D/S`s.  How can you lose with a 65 step prog?      I remember that you move up the prog. as losses come in one step at a time and down 6 steps on a win.  It sounds like an ideal prog. for this system.

Good luck,
Brian

[RouletteGhost]

SEX  AND THE HG!

Which caught your eye?  I bet it was the HG       Hahahaha
Well this post is a long time dead but as I have posted previously, there are some nuggets amongst old posts and I believe this one betting on a single dozen is on of them.  In nearly   one week of `dry` testing on  Wm. Hill live it has never lost  once.    This is a task for Mogul397 as he is able to find RFH`s where none exist.  Over to you Mogul that is if you have not given up hope of finding a winning system and taken a job at KFC or Subway.

In the orginal post it was said this system had not lost in 2 years.  How was it over-looked: disbelief perhaps?

Regards,    Brian

Perfect for airball. Provided no shenanigans taking place on the machine

Id say if the airball alters results at all or is capable of doing so playing on a full wheel would be a good idea

[denzie]

A 65 step progression on single doz ? 

[bleep24]

Hi Denzie,
Yes that is what I said.  Obviously you are not winning back your losses on one bet.  It is like a ladder:  moving up and down therefore you need a good bet selection method. 
Have looked for this but cannot now find it.  Perhaps some other forum member remembers it or knows where it can be found.

Brian

[Tomla021]

I think I saw this once I will ask around